Search

Background:Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X (FCCTX) is defined as individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) who families meet Amsterdam Criteria-1 (AC1), but whose tumours are DNA-mismatch-repair-proficient, unlike Lynch syndrome (LS). FCCTX does not have an increased risk of extra-colonic cancers. This analysis compares epidemiologic and clinicopathologic features among FCCTX, LS, and 'non-familial' (non-AC1) CRC cases.Methods:From the Colon Cancer Family Registry, FCCTX (n=173), LS (n=303), and non-AC1 (n=9603) CRC cases were identified. Questionnaire-based epidemiologic information and CRC pathologic features were compared across case groups using polytomous logistic regression.Results:Compared with LS, FCCTX cases were less likely to be current (vs never) smokers; have a proximal subsite (vs rectal) tumour; or have mucinous histology, poor differentiation, or tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. There were no observed differences in co-morbidities or medication usage.Conclusions:FCCTX were less likely to be current tobacco users; other exposures were similar between these groups. Histopathologic differences highly suggestive of LS CRCs do not appear to be shared by FCCTX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We examined the use of antibiotics among 2728 women with a first diagnosis of breast cancer during 1994-2003, and 27?280 population controls in North Jutland County, Denmark, based on hospital discharge diagnoses, prescription use from 1989 to 2002, and population registry data. We found no increased relative risk of breast cancer associated with use compared with nonuse. The odds ratio for breast cancer associated with more than 10 prescriptions for antibiotics was 1.00 (95%CI 0.86-1.15). Relative risks were similar for different classes of antibiotics. A subanalysis based on cases and controls younger than 70 years of age, with data on first birth and number of children, showed similar risk estimates even after adjustment for age at first birth and parity. In our study, use of antibiotics was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.British Journal of Cancer (2005) 92, 594-596. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602313 www.bjcancer.com Published online 21 December 2004 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]