4 results on '"Aprile, M."'
Search Results
2. A randomised factorial trial of sequential doxorubicin and CMF vs CMF and chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.
- Author
-
De Placido, S., De Laurentiis, M., De Lena, M., Lorusso, V., Paradiso, A., D'Aprile, M., Pistillucci, G., Farris, A., Sarobba, M. G., Palazzo, S., Manzione, L., Adamo, V., Palmeri, S., Ferraù, F., Lauria, R., Pagliarulo, C., Petrella, G., Limite, G., Costanzo, R., and Bianco, A. R.
- Subjects
DOXORUBICIN ,GOSERELIN ,TAMOXIFEN ,DRUG therapy ,CANCER patients ,ANTHRACYCLINES ,THERAPEUTIC use of antineoplastic agents ,RESEARCH ,CLINICAL trials ,RESEARCH methodology ,METASTASIS ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,PROGNOSIS ,MEDICAL cooperation ,EVALUATION research ,METHOTREXATE ,FLUOROURACIL ,DRUG administration ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE ,COMBINED modality therapy ,BREAST tumors ,LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
The sequential doxorubicin --> CMF (CMF=cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen has never been compared to CMF in a randomised trial. The role of adding goserelin and tamoxifen after chemotherapy is unclear. In all, 466 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to: (a) CMF x 6 cycles (CMF); (b) doxorubicin x 4 cycles followed by CMF x 6 cycles (A --> CMF); (c) CMF x 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen x 2 years (CMF --> GT); and (d) doxorubicin x 4 cycles followed by CMF x 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen x 2 years (A --> CMF --> GT). The study used a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design to assess: (1) the effect of the chemotherapy regimens (CMF vs A --> CMF or arms a+c vs b+d) and (2) the effect of adding GT after chemotherapy (arms a+b vs c+d). At a median follow-up of 72 months, A --> CMF as compared to CMF significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR)=0.740 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556-0.986; P=0.040) and produced a nonsignificant improvement of overall survival (OS) (HR=0.764; 95% CI: 0.489-1.193). The addition of GT after chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.555-0.987; P=0.040), with a nonsignificant improvement of OS (HR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.54-1.32). A --> CMF is superior to CMF. Adding GT after chemotherapy is beneficial for premenopausal node-positive patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Targeting metabolism by B-raf inhibitors and diclofenac restrains the viability of BRAF-mutated thyroid carcinomas with Hif-1α-mediated glycolytic phenotype.
- Author
-
Aprile M, Cataldi S, Perfetto C, Federico A, Ciccodicola A, and Costa V
- Subjects
- Humans, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf metabolism, Mutation, Protein Kinase Inhibitors pharmacology, Glycolysis genetics, Phenotype, Glucose, Cell Line, Tumor, Diclofenac pharmacology, Diclofenac therapeutic use, Thyroid Neoplasms drug therapy, Thyroid Neoplasms genetics, Thyroid Neoplasms metabolism
- Abstract
Background: B-raf inhibitors (BRAFi) are effective for BRAF-mutated papillary (PTC) and anaplastic (ATC) thyroid carcinomas, although acquired resistance impairs tumour cells' sensitivity and/or limits drug efficacy. Targeting metabolic vulnerabilities is emerging as powerful approach in cancer., Methods: In silico analyses identified metabolic gene signatures and Hif-1α as glycolysis regulator in PTC. BRAF-mutated PTC, ATC and control thyroid cell lines were exposed to HIF1A siRNAs or chemical/drug treatments (CoCl
2 , EGF, HGF, BRAFi, MEKi and diclofenac). Genes/proteins expression, glucose uptake, lactate quantification and viability assays were used to investigate the metabolic vulnerability of BRAF-mutated cells., Results: A specific metabolic gene signature was identified as a hallmark of BRAF-mutated tumours, which display a glycolytic phenotype, characterised by enhanced glucose uptake, lactate efflux and increased expression of Hif-1α-modulated glycolytic genes. Indeed, Hif-1α stabilisation counteracts the inhibitory effects of BRAFi on these genes and on cell viability. Interestingly, targeting metabolic routes with BRAFi and diclofenac combination we could restrain the glycolytic phenotype and synergistically reduce tumour cells' viability., Conclusion: The identification of a metabolic vulnerability of BRAF-mutated carcinomas and the capacity BRAFi and diclofenac combination to target metabolism open new therapeutic perspectives in maximising drug efficacy and reducing the onset of secondary resistance and drug-related toxicity., (© 2023. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Supportive care in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Author
-
Di Maio M, Perrone F, Gallo C, Iaffaioli RV, Manzione L, Piantedosi FV, Cigolari S, Illiano A, Barbera S, Robbiati SF, Piazza E, Ianniello GP, Frontini L, Veltri E, Castiglione F, Rosetti F, De Maio E, Maione P, Gridelli C, Rossi A, Barletta E, Barzelloni ML, Signoriello G, Bilancia D, Dinota A, Rosati G, Germano D, Lamberti A, Pontillo V, Brancacio L, Crispino C, Esposito M, Battiloro C, Tufano G, Cioffi A, Guardasole V, Angelini V, Guidetti G, Barbera S, Renda F, Romano F, Volpintesta A, Robbiati SF, Sannicolò M, Filipazzi V, Esani G, Gambaro A, Ferrario S, Tinessa V, Caprio MG, Zonato S, Cabiddu M, Raina A, Veltri E, D'Aprile M, Pistillucci G, Porcile G, Ostellino O, Vinante O, Azzarello G, Gebbia V, Borsellino N, Testa A, Gasparini G, Morabito A, Gattuso D, Romito S, Carrozza F, Fava S, Calcagno A, Grimi E, Bertetto O, Ciuffreda L, Parello G, Maiorino L, Santoro A, Santoro M, Failla G, Aiello RA, Bearz A, Sorio R, Scalone S, Clerici M, Bollina R, Belloni P, Sacco C, Sibau A, Adamo V, Altavilla G, Scimone A, Spatafora M, Bellia V, Hopps MR, Monfardini S, Favaretto A, Stefani M, Corradini GM, Pavia G, Scagliotti G, Novello S, Selvaggi G, Tonato M, Darwish S, Michetti G, Belometti MO, Labianca R, Quadri A, De Marinis F, Migliorino MR, Martelli O, Colucci G, Galetta D, Giotta F, Isa L, Candido P, Rossi N, Calandriello A, Ferraù F, Malaponte E, Barni S, Cazzaniga M, Gebbia N, Valerio MR, Belli M, Colantuoni G, Capuano MA, Angiolillo M, Sollitto F, Ardizzoia A, Luporini G, Locatelli MC, Pari F, Aitini E, Pedicini T, Febbraro A, Zollo C, Di Costanzo F, Bartolucci R, Gasperoni S, Gaion F, Palazzolo G, Galligioni E, Caffo O, Cortesi E, D'Auria G, Curcio C, Vasta M, Bumma C, Celano A, Bretti S, Nettis G, Anselmo A, Mattioli R, Nisticò C, Aschelter A, and Foa P
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Antiemetics therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung secondary, Cisplatin administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Survival Rate, Vinblastine administration & dosage, Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Vinblastine analogs & derivatives
- Abstract
The present study describes supportive care (SC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), evaluating whether it is affected by concomitant chemotherapy, patient's performance status (PS) and age. Data of patients enrolled in three randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy, conducted between 1996 and 2001, were pooled. The analysis was limited to the first three cycles of treatment. Supportive care data were available for 1185 out of 1312 (90%) enrolled patients. Gastrointestinal drugs (45.7%), corticosteroids (33.4%) and analgesics (23.8%) were the most frequently observed categories. The mean number of drugs per patient was 2.43; 538 patients (45.4%) assumed three or more supportive drugs. Vinorelbine does not produce substantial variations in the SC pattern, while cisplatin-based treatment requires an overall higher number of supportive drugs, with higher use of antiemetics (41 vs 27%) and antianaemics (10 vs 4%). Patients with worse PS are more exposed to corticosteroids (42 vs 30%). Elderly patients require drugs against concomitant diseases significantly more than adults (20 vs 7%) and are less frequently exposed to antiemetics (12 vs 27%). In conclusion, polypharmacotherapy is a relevant issue in patients with advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy does not remarkably affect the pattern of SC, except for some drugs against side effects. Elderly patients assume more drugs for concomitant diseases and receive less antiemetics than adults.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.