Search

Many centres include a communication course as part of their auditory rehabilitation. These usually take the form of a small group and include discussion of the effects of hearing loss, use of the hearing aid, hearing tactics and lip reading. To investigate the efficacy of such a rehabilitation programme a randomized, controlled trial of a communication course was undertaken. All subjects were first time hearing aid users; handicap was measured using the Quantified Denver Scale of Communication Function (QDS) at the time of hearing aid fitting, and then 13 weeks later. All subjects had a hearing aid follow-up appointment, but the treatment group (n = 22) also underwent a four-week communication course, while the control group (n = 25) had no further rehabilitation. The reduction in handicap measured by the change in QDS was significantly greater for the treatment group than for the control group (Mann Whitney U test, tied p value = 0.014). This indicates that such a communication course is efficacious in reducing handicap. Further research is required to identify the populations that will benefit most from such a course.

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common condition that often resolves spontaneously, but can cause significant distress to a patient. Management of this condition includes no intervention, medication, surgery, physical exercises and more recently 'particle repositioning' manoeuvres. Repositioning manoeuvres aim to relocate free-floating particles from the posterior semicircular canal into the utricle where they will no longer cause vertiginous symptoms. This article describes the different exercises and repositioning manoeuvres in use and examines their efficacy. In the light of this review a management strategy for BPPV is suggested.

Sound field audiometry is used primarily for hearing assessment in young children and for functional hearing aid evaluation. It is important that measurements are accurate and reliable as they affect the management of patients. Most clinics use a substitution method for calibration and, as a result, if the subject moves from the calibrated test point, the sound pressure level (SPL) at the ears will vary as the sound field is very rarely uniform. This variation can result in inaccurate threshold estimation and increased test-retest variability. A commonly used method for evaluating the potential errors due to subject movement involves measuring the variation in SPL, with respect to the test point, at six points around the test point. This method makes assumptions about the sound field which may not be valid and could lead to an underestimation of the variation present. The aim of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of this method. Measurements of variation were taken with a microphone and repeated with a head and torso simulator (HATS) which was used to represent a test subject. The total degree of variation indicated by these two methods was compared. The microphone measurements indicated less variation than the HATS measurements. The differences were statistically significant but small in clinical terms. Assuming that the HATS is properly representative of the normal population, then this result indicates that simple microphone measurements are acceptable for normal clinical practice but that higher quality measurements are desirable for critical work.

A questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the relative comfort of a comprehensive range of diagnostic procedures. The mean comfort ranking and variability in comfort were examined. Pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry are the most comfortable tests, while caloric testing and transtympanic electrocochleography are the least comfortable. However, caloric testing and glycerol dehydration are not significantly different in comfort to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and brainstem evoked response testing is more comfortable than other diagnostic tests, including MRI. The reasons for these differences and the implications for diagnostic management are discussed.