Search

Your search keyword '"M. Berthoud"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "M. Berthoud" Journal british journal of anaesthesia
5 results on '"M. Berthoud"'

1. Proceedings of the Anaesthetic Research Society Meeting

Author

B. J. Pollard, J.R. Sneyd, B. A. McGrath, O. Adeyi, Gary Minto, O. Tanner, C. Barben, K. M. Rowan, Monty G. Mythen, S. Wrigley, M. Morgan, T. Szakmany, S. G. Pollard, T. Quraishi, R. Malhotra, P. N. Foster, Graham J. Kemp, S. Benington, D. K. Arvind, Alistair Macfie, Donald H. Burke, J. McDonald, K. Browett, S. C. Radley, F. S. Haddad, Rebecca Cusack, Andrew Bates, S. Wilson, D. Turnbull, M. C. Bellamy, S. Turvill, Hugh McCann, Alasdair W Jubb, G. Calo, B. Telgarsky, T. Wilson, J. Rigg, D. G. Lambert, A. W. Blatcher, N. Saxena, Remo Guerrini, L. Potter, M. F. Bird, Mark Emberton, K. Nishikawa, Judith Elizabeth Hall, A. McDonald, Kevin Murphy, John Kinsella, S. Rahmani, J. E. Hall, H. Zhao, A. Bryan, M. Davey, A. Tridente, G. P. Aithal, R. P. Tully, Simon Mercer, A. Fisher, Michael P. W. Grocott, M. Parker, D. G. Lloyd, V. Rewari, Steve Harris, Janek Mann, A. J. Stone, M. Al-Hashimi, David J. Rowbotham, R. H. Hawes, M. Pirmohamed, Paul Wright, Ahilanandan Dushianthan, W. F. S. Sellers, Simon J. Howell, M. West, P. A. Kyriacou, P. Charters, D. A. Hume, I. K. Moppett, W. A. Bickmore, R.A. Struthers, V. Goss, Antony Robert Wilkes, J. P. Phillips, A. P. Jackson, C. Jepegnanam, I. M. Goodhart, D. Atkinson, K. D. Singh, A. Diukova, Richard G. Wise, J. Andrzejowski, Siobhan Creanor, M. Leuwer, S.K. Pal, J. P. Thompson, A. D. Harris, Sandy Jack, I. Gall, B. Shelley, T. Zaman, A. D. Postle, C. Taylor-Hannan, A. K. Toor, Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe, J. Wood, Y. Sorour, T. Starkie, B. Batuwitage, C. Johnstone, S. Webber, A. Banerjee, M. Chikhani, J. A. Moore, J. M. Hunter, D. Ma, T. Y. Cui, S. Charters, M. Berthoud, Lisa Loughney, S. Muthukumaraswamy, C. J. D. Pomfrett, A. Belhaj, G. H. Mills, G. B. Drummond, A. Vinogradov, P. Alexander, R.S. Vardanyan, J. Snowden, Helena R. Watts, Z. Milan, M. Drozd, D. Lythgoe, L. Jobling, J. Davidson, Marcela P. Vizcaychipi, M. Eberl, and R. M. Langford

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, business.industry, Family medicine, medicine, Optometry, business
Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Day Case Surgery

Author

M. Berthoud

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, business.industry, General surgery, Medicine, Day case surgery, business
Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Infusion of propofol to identify smallest effective doses for induction of anaesthesia in young and elderly patients.

Author

Peacock JE, Spiers SP, McLauchlan GA, Edmondson WC, Berthoud M, and Reilly CS

Subjects
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen blood, Anesthesia, Intravenous methods, Propofol administration & dosage
Abstract

We studied 110 patients older than 60 yr or aged 18-50 yr as separate groups in two stages to identify the smallest effective doses of propofol for induction of anaesthesia. In the elderly patients, in stage 1, at infusion rates of 25, 50 or 100 mg min-1 the mean (SD) doses administered were propofol 0.82 (0.14) mg kg-1, 1.22 (0.24) mg kg-1 and 1.65 (0.60) mg kg-1 and the induction times 140.1 (21.9) s, 103.2 (23.5) s and 69.4 (10.0) s, respectively. In stage 2, after induction with a fixed dose of 0.82 mg kg-1 as a bolus over 5 s or as an infusion at 25 mg min-1, the times for induction were 38.5 (14.0) s and 144.5 (36.6) s, respectively. In the young patients, at induction rates of 33.3, 50, 100 or 200 mg min-1, the doses administered were propofol 1.36 (0.28) mg kg-1, 1.46 (0.12) mg kg-1, 1.85 (0.43) mg kg-1 and 2.39 (0.50) mg kg-1 and the induction times 145.0 (25.4) s, 120.0 (18.4) s, 80.2 (19.2) s and 54.5 (10.4) s, respectively. In stage 2, a fixed induction dose of 1.46 mg kg-1 resulted in induction times of 35.0 (8.5) s and 134.0 (26.8) s, respectively. In stage 2 of each age group, induction was achieved with smaller doses than those recommended previously and there was no difference in the number of patients in whom induction of anaesthesia was successful or in the measured cardiorespiratory variables between the two induction regimens. This suggests the latter effects are caused by the dose administered and not the rate of administration.

Published
1992
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results