Search

Technological advances have now made it possible to simultaneously profile the changes of epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic at the single cell level, allowing a more unified view of cellular phenotypes and heterogeneities. However, current computational tools for single-cell multi-omics data integration are mainly tailored for bi-modality data, so new tools are urgently needed to integrate tri-modality data with complex associations. To this end, we develop scMHNN to integrate single-cell multi-omics data based on hypergraph neural network. After modeling the complex data associations among various modalities, scMHNN performs message passing process on the multi-omics hypergraph, which can capture the high-order data relationships and integrate the multiple heterogeneous features. Followingly, scMHNN learns discriminative cell representation via a dual-contrastive loss in self-supervised manner. Based on the pretrained hypergraph encoder, we further introduce the pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm, which allows more accurate cell-type annotation with only a small number of labeled cells as reference. Benchmarking results on real and simulated single-cell tri-modality datasets indicate that scMHNN outperforms other competing methods on both cell clustering and cell-type annotation tasks. In addition, we also demonstrate scMHNN facilitates various downstream tasks, such as cell marker detection and enrichment analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, a number of computational approaches have been proposed to effectively integrate multiple heterogeneous biological networks, and have shown impressive performance for inferring gene function. However, the previous methods do not fully represent the critical neighborhood relationship between genes during the feature learning process. Furthermore, it is difficult to accurately estimate the contributions of different views for multi-view integration. In this paper, we propose MGEGFP, a multi-view graph embedding method based on adaptive estimation with Graph Convolutional Network (GCN), to learn high-quality gene representations among multiple interaction networks for function prediction. First, we design a dual-channel GCN encoder to disentangle the view-specific information and the consensus pattern across diverse networks. By the aid of disentangled representations, we develop a multi-gate module to adaptively estimate the contributions of different views during each reconstruction process and make full use of the multiplexity advantages, where a diversity preservation constraint is designed to prevent the over-fitting problem. To validate the effectiveness of our model, we conduct experiments on networks from the STRING database for both yeast and human datasets, and compare the performance with seven state-of-the-art methods in five evaluation metrics. Moreover, the ablation study manifests the important contribution of the designed dual-channel encoder, multi-gate module and the diversity preservation constraint in MGEGFP. The experimental results confirm the superiority of our proposed method and suggest that MGEGFP can be a useful tool for gene function prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies facilitate the characterization of transcriptomic landscapes in diverse species, tissues, and cell types with unprecedented molecular resolution. In order to evaluate various biological hypotheses using high-dimensional single-cell gene expression data, most computational and statistical methods depend on a gene feature selection step to identify genes with high biological variability and reduce computational complexity. Even though many gene selection methods have been developed for scRNA-seq analysis, there lacks a systematic comparison of the assumptions, statistical models, and selection criteria used by these methods. In this article, we summarize and discuss 17 computational methods for selecting gene features in unsupervised analysis of single-cell gene expression data, with unified notations and statistical frameworks. Our discussion provides a useful summary to help practitioners select appropriate methods based on their assumptions and applicability, and to assist method developers in designing new computational tools for unsupervised learning of scRNA-seq data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies has enabled gene expression profiling at the single-cell resolution, thereby enabling the quantification and comparison of transcriptional variability among individual cells. Although alterations in transcriptional variability have been observed in various biological states, statistical methods for quantifying and testing differential variability between groups of cells are still lacking. To identify the best practices in differential variability analysis of single-cell gene expression data, we propose and compare 12 statistical pipelines using different combinations of methods for normalization, feature selection, dimensionality reduction and variability calculation. Using high-quality synthetic scRNA-seq datasets, we benchmarked the proposed pipelines and found that the most powerful and accurate pipeline performs simple library size normalization, retains all genes in analysis and uses denSNE-based distances to cluster medoids as the variability measure. By applying this pipeline to scRNA-seq datasets of COVID-19 and autism patients, we have identified cellular variability changes between patients with different severity status or between patients and healthy controls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spatially resolved transcriptomics technologies enable the measurement of transcriptome information while retaining the spatial context at the regional, cellular or sub-cellular level. While previous computational methods have relied on gene expression information alone for clustering single-cell populations, more recent methods have begun to leverage spatial location and histology information to improve cell clustering and cell-type identification. In this study, using seven semi-synthetic datasets with real spatial locations, simulated gene expression and histology images as well as ground truth cell-type labels, we evaluate 15 clustering methods based on clustering accuracy, robustness to data variation and input parameters, computational efficiency, and software usability. Our analysis demonstrates that even though incorporating the additional spatial and histology information leads to increased accuracy in some datasets, it does not consistently improve clustering compared with using only gene expression data. Our results indicate that for the clustering of spatial transcriptomics data, there are still opportunities to enhance the overall accuracy and robustness by improving information extraction and feature selection from spatial and histology data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The parallel measurement of transcriptome and proteome revealed unmatched profiles. Since proteomic analysis is more expensive and challenging than transcriptomic analysis, the question of how to use messenger RNA (mRNA) expression data to predict protein level is extremely important. Here, we comprehensively evaluated 13 machine learning models on inferring protein expression levels using RNA expression profile. A total of 20 proteogenomic datasets from three mainstream proteomic platforms with >2500 samples of 13 human tissues were collected for model evaluation. Our results highlighted that the appropriate feature selection methods combined with classical machine learning models could achieve excellent predictive performance. The voting ensemble model outperformed other candidate models across datasets. Adding the mRNA proxy model to the regression model further improved the prediction performance. The dataset and gene characteristics could affect the prediction performance. Finally, we applied the model to the brain transcriptome of cerebral cortex regions to infer the protein profile for better understanding the functional characteristics of the brain regions. This benchmarking work not only provides useful hints on the inherent correlation between transcriptome and proteome, but also has practical value of the transcriptome-based prediction of protein expression levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]