Search

The advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies has enabled gene expression profiling at the single-cell resolution, thereby enabling the quantification and comparison of transcriptional variability among individual cells. Although alterations in transcriptional variability have been observed in various biological states, statistical methods for quantifying and testing differential variability between groups of cells are still lacking. To identify the best practices in differential variability analysis of single-cell gene expression data, we propose and compare 12 statistical pipelines using different combinations of methods for normalization, feature selection, dimensionality reduction and variability calculation. Using high-quality synthetic scRNA-seq datasets, we benchmarked the proposed pipelines and found that the most powerful and accurate pipeline performs simple library size normalization, retains all genes in analysis and uses denSNE-based distances to cluster medoids as the variability measure. By applying this pipeline to scRNA-seq datasets of COVID-19 and autism patients, we have identified cellular variability changes between patients with different severity status or between patients and healthy controls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies facilitate the characterization of transcriptomic landscapes in diverse species, tissues, and cell types with unprecedented molecular resolution. In order to evaluate various biological hypotheses using high-dimensional single-cell gene expression data, most computational and statistical methods depend on a gene feature selection step to identify genes with high biological variability and reduce computational complexity. Even though many gene selection methods have been developed for scRNA-seq analysis, there lacks a systematic comparison of the assumptions, statistical models, and selection criteria used by these methods. In this article, we summarize and discuss 17 computational methods for selecting gene features in unsupervised analysis of single-cell gene expression data, with unified notations and statistical frameworks. Our discussion provides a useful summary to help practitioners select appropriate methods based on their assumptions and applicability, and to assist method developers in designing new computational tools for unsupervised learning of scRNA-seq data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]