Search

Despite an abundance of information available for dealing with patients with BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations, little guidance is available to assist the surgeon in dealing with the genetically high-risk patient recently diagnosed with breast cancer. A retrospective review was undertaken of 170 patients who underwent genetic counseling and testing over a 3-year period from March 2000 to March 2003. Forty-three of the 170 patients tested were diagnosed with breast cancer prior to genetic testing. Nine patients (20.9%) tested positive for a deleterious mutation. Fifty-eight percent underwent genetic counseling prior to definitive cancer surgery. Five of the 25 patients who underwent lumpectomy tested positive for a deleterious mutation. Testing results became available during systemic therapy or radiation was delayed until results were known. After counseling, all five patients testing positive went on to bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction. None had radiation therapy. Because of a strong family history, eight patients elected to undergo prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction prior to obtaining genetic test results; and despite compelling histories, all eight tested negative for a mutation. Treatment algorithms are developed to manage patients that are first discovered to be at high risk for a BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 mutation at the time they are diagnosed with breast cancer. Patients diagnosed with breast cancer who are discovered to be at high risk for a genetic mutation should undergo counseling prior to definitive surgery. This maximizes the time that patients have to consider options for prophylaxis and monitoring should their test be positive. It also prevents women who would otherwise be candidates for breast preservation from undergoing unnecessary radiation therapy should they chose prophylactic mastectomy in the face of a positive test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Image-guided core needle breast biopsy (IGCNBB) is an incisional biopsy technique that has been associated with tumor cell displacement. Theoretically tumor cell displacement may affect local recurrence rates in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We performed a study to determine if the biopsy method impacted local control rates following BCT. Patients with nonpalpable breast cancer (invasive and intraductal) diagnosed at our institution and treated with BCT between July 1993 and July 1996 were selected to provide a follow-up period in which the majority of local recurrences should be detected. Patients were divided into two groups based on their method of diagnosis. Group I patients were diagnosed by IGCNBB and group II patients were diagnosed by wire localized excisional breast biopsy (WLEBB). Factors potentially affecting local recurrence rates were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred eleven patients were treated with BCT, 132 were diagnosed by IGCNBB and 79 by WLEBB. The two patient groups were similar when compared for prognostic factors and treatment. All patients' BCT included histologically negative margins. There were 4 (3.0%) local recurrences in Group I at a median follow-up of 44.4 months and 2 (2.5%) local recurrences in group II at a median follow-up of 50.1 months. This difference was not significant. Breast cancer patients diagnosed by IGCNBB can be treated by BCT with acceptable local control rates. Additional surveillance of our institutional experience and others' is mandatory to validate IGCNBB as the preferred biopsy method for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.