1. Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline.
- Author
-
Marinovich ML, Saunders CM, Pereira G, and Houssami N
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Mastectomy, Segmental, Mastectomy, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Western Australia, Margins of Excision, Breast Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background: A 2014 SSO-ASTRO guideline on surgical margins aimed to reduce unnecessary reoperation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). We investigate whether publication of the guideline was associated with a reduction in reoperation in Western Australia (WA)., Methods: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, cases of newly-diagnosed breast cancer were identified from the WA Cancer Registry. Linkage to the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection identified index BCS for invasive cancer between January 2009 and June 2018 (N = 8059) and reoperation within 90 days. Pre-guideline (2009-2013) and post-guideline (2014-2018) reoperation proportions were compared, and temporal trends were estimated with generalised linear regression., Results: The pre-guideline reoperation proportion was 25.8% compared with 21.7% post-guideline (difference -4.0% [95% CI -5.9, -2.2, p < 0.001], odds ratio [OR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.72, 0.89, p < 0.001]). Absolute reductions were similar for repeat BCS (16.3% versus 14.6%; difference -1.8% [95% CI -3.4, -0.2, p = 0.03]) and conversion to mastectomy (9.4% versus 7.2%; difference -2.2% [95% CI -3.4, -1.0, p < 0.001]). Over the study period, there was an annual absolute change in reoperation of -0.8% (95% CI -1.2, -0.5, p < 0.001). Accounting for this linear trend, the difference in reoperation between time periods was -0.5% (95% CI -4.3, 3.3; p = 0.81), reflecting a non-significant reduction in conversion to mastectomy., Conclusions: Comparisons of pre- versus post-guideline time periods in WA showed reductions in reoperation that were similar to international estimates; however, an annual decline in reoperation predated the guideline. Analyses that do not account for temporal trends are likely to overestimate changes in reoperation associated with the guideline., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MLM and NH contributed to the meta-analyses that supported the SSO/ASTRO guideline. NH contributed to the development of the SSO/ASTRO guideline. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF