Search

Neutropenia is the most common toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors, causing frequent dose interruptions. However, CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced neutropenia shows a benign clinical course in contrast to that caused by chemotherapy. Here, we investigated the safety of a new dose scheme for palbociclib, which avoids dose delays or reductions due to afebrile grade 3 neutropenia. A consecutive cohort of ER( +)/HER2( −) advanced breast cancer patients who received palbociclib between 2017 and 2018 was analyzed. The patients were classified into Group 1 (patients who maintained palbociclib dose with afebrile grade 3 neutropenia), Group 2 (patients who experienced any dose modification with afebrile grade 3 neutropenia), and Group 3 (patients without afebrile grade 3 neutropenia). The primary endpoint was febrile neutropenia incidence; other toxicities were compared with those of the PALOMA-2 trial. Among the 107 patients, 54.2%, 22.4%, and 23.4% were classified into Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no febrile neutropenia in Groups 1 and 2 during palbociclib treatment. Group 1 showed higher incidence of thrombocytopenia (all-grade, 32.8%; grade 3–4, 8.6%) than Group 2 and the PALOMA-2 data, but there was no bleeding related to thrombocytopenia. Group 1 showed higher incidence of all-grade non-hematologic adverse events than Group 2; only one grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was observed in Group 1. There were no treatment-related hospitalizations or deaths in Group 1. Thus, omitting palbociclib dose modification with afebrile grade 3 neutropenia is safe and tolerable without febrile neutropenia events. This scheme could be useful to avoid unnecessary reductions in palbociclib doses in future practice.

An antibody–drug conjugate targeting HER2, DS8201, has shown clinical activity against breast cancer with low-level HER2 expression. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of intermediate HER2 expression in estrogen receptor (ER)+ early breast cancer (EBC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) cohorts. We analyzed prospectively collected data from EBC and MBC cohorts at Yonsei Cancer Center. Patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 0 ~ 1+ were assigned to the HER2-negative group, and patients with IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization (ISH)-negativity were assigned to the HER2-intermediate group. After the exclusion of HER2 IHC 3+ or ISH+ patients, a total of 2657 EBC and 535 MBC patients were analyzed. In total, 654 (24.6%) EBC and 166 (31.0%) MBC patients were classified in the HER2-intermediate group. The HER2-intermediate patients more frequently tended to have progesterone receptor (PR)-negativity and higher nuclear grade in the EBC cohort, and showed a higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 55 years compared with the HER2-negative group in the MBC cohort. The HER2-intermediate patients showed significantly poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to the HER2-negative patients in the EBC cohort (p = 0.044). Notably, intermediate HER2 expression predicted poorer RFS in EBC patients aged ≥ 55 years (hazard ratio 1.95; p = 0.042) in multivariate Cox analysis but did not affect RFS in those aged

This study aimed to examine the prevalence and trends of breast cancer-related risk factors and characteristics in premenopausal underweight Korean women according to birth year cohort. Socioeconomic and breast cancer-related risk factors were investigated in 13,415 premenopausal women using nationwide cross-sectional surveys performed between 2007 and 2015. Underweight was defined as body mass index

In the original publication of the article, under the Results section, subheading "Patient survival", the second sentence that reads as "The 6-month PFS was 92.4%, 81.8%, and 93.3% and the one-year PFS was 72.0%, 88.9%, and 78.9% in Groups 1-3, respectively." should read as "The 6-month PFS was 82.8%, 75.0%, and 68.0% and the one-year PFS was 77.0%, 62.0%, and 63.8% in Groups 1-3, respectively.".

The Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary dissection (ALND) could be omitted during breast-conserving therapy for cT1-2N0 breast cancers with 1–2 metastatic SLNs. However, that result has not been validated in a larger cohort and the significance of the small number of SLNs remains unclear. This study aimed to validate the Z0011 results within an Asian Z0011-eligible cohort and determine whether the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influenced the Z0011-based outcomes. Data from Asian patients who fulfilled the Z0011 criteria were collected from five hospitals. Disease recurrence (DR) was compared between patients who underwent ALND or SLN dissection (SLND) alone. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce the effects of potential selection biases. During 2010–2016, 1750 Asian patients had 1–2 SLN metastases and fulfilled the Z0011 criteria. These patients included 707 cases treated using SLND alone (40%) and 967 patients with ≤ 2 SLNs (55%). Ninety-five patients (5.4%) experienced DR at a median interval of 50 months, although the rates of DR were similar in the ALND and SLND groups. The adjusted hazard ratios for DR after ALND omission were 0.95 (95% CI 0.55–1.64) among the entire cohort and 0.83 (95% CI 0.34–2.03) among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. In this Asian Z0011-eligible cohort, ALND omission did not increase risk of DR, even among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. Therefore, the Z0011 strategy might be safely applied in Asia, and a small number of SLNs did not significantly influence this strategy.