Search

Your search keyword '"Eric Hahnen"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Eric Hahnen" Journal breast cancer research
5 results on '"Eric Hahnen"'

1. Association of germline genetic variants with breast cancer-specific survival in patient subgroups defined by clinic-pathological variables related to tumor biology and type of systemic treatment

Author

Anna Morra, Maria Escala-Garcia, Jonathan Beesley, Renske Keeman, Sander Canisius, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Paul L. Auer, Annelie Augustinsson, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Hermann Brenner, Thomas Brüning, Saundra S. Buys, Bette Caan, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E. Castelao, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Ting-Yuan David Cheng, Christine L. Clarke, NBCS Collaborators, Sarah V. Colonna, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B. Daly, Joe Dennis, Thilo Dörk, Laure Dossus, Alison M. Dunning, Miriam Dwek, Diana M. Eccles, Arif B. Ekici, A. Heather Eliassen, Mikael Eriksson, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Henrik Flyger, Lin Fritschi, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, José A. García-Sáenz, Graham G. Giles, Mervi Grip, Pascal Guénel, Melanie Gündert, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Steven N. Hart, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Arndt Hartmann, Wei He, Maartje J. Hooning, Reiner Hoppe, John L. Hopper, Anthony Howell, David J. Hunter, ABCTB Investigators, kConFab Investigators, Agnes Jager, Anna Jakubowska, Wolfgang Janni, Esther M. John, Audrey Y. Jung, Rudolf Kaaks, Machteld Keupers, Cari M. Kitahara, Stella Koutros, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, Allison W. Kurian, James V. Lacey, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Martha Linet, Robert N. Luben, Jan Lubiński, Michael Lush, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, John W. M. Martens, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Kyriaki Michailidou, Roger L. Milne, Anna Marie Mulligan, Taru A. Muranen, Heli Nevanlinna, William G. Newman, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Andrew F. Olshan, Håkan Olsson, Nick Orr, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Alpa V. Patel, Bernard Peissel, Paolo Peterlongo, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Karolina Prajzendanc, Ross Prentice, Nadege Presneau, Brigitte Rack, Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Valerie Rhenius, Atocha Romero, Rebecca Roylance, Matthias Ruebner, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Rita K. Schmutzler, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christopher Scott, Mitul Shah, Snezhana Smichkoska, Melissa C. Southey, Jennifer Stone, Harald Surowy, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Rulla M. Tamimi, William J. Tapper, Lauren R. Teras, Mary Beth Terry, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Ian Tomlinson, Melissa A. Troester, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Qin Wang, Amber N. Hurson, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Argyrios Ziogas, Hiltrud Brauch, Montserrat García-Closas, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Douglas F. Easton, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, and Marjanka K. Schmidt

Subjects
Common germline genetic variants, Breast cancer-specific survival, Patient subgroups, Tumor biology, Systemic treatment, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Abstract Background Given the high heterogeneity among breast tumors, associations between common germline genetic variants and survival that may exist within specific subgroups could go undetected in an unstratified set of breast cancer patients. Methods We performed genome-wide association analyses within 15 subgroups of breast cancer patients based on prognostic factors, including hormone receptors, tumor grade, age, and type of systemic treatment. Analyses were based on 91,686 female patients of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, including 7531 breast cancer-specific deaths over a median follow-up of 8.1 years. Cox regression was used to assess associations of common germline variants with 15-year and 5-year breast cancer-specific survival. We assessed the probability of these associations being true positives via the Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Germline loss-of-function variants in the BARD1 gene are associated with early-onset familial breast cancer but not ovarian cancer

Author

Nana Weber-Lassalle, Julika Borde, Konstantin Weber-Lassalle, Judit Horváth, Dieter Niederacher, Norbert Arnold, Silke Kaulfuß, Corinna Ernst, Victoria G. Paul, Ellen Honisch, Kristina Klaschik, Alexander E. Volk, Christian Kubisch, Steffen Rapp, Nadine Lichey, Janine Altmüller, Louisa Lepkes, Esther Pohl-Rescigno, Holger Thiele, Peter Nürnberg, Mirjam Larsen, Lisa Richters, Kerstin Rhiem, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, and Jan Hauke

Subjects
Early onset breast cancer, Ovarian cancer, BARD1, Germline mutations, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Abstract Background The role of the BARD1 gene in breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition remains elusive, as published case-control investigations have revealed controversial results. We aimed to assess the role of deleterious BARD1 germline variants in BC/OC predisposition in a sample of 4920 BRCA1/2-negative female BC/OC index patients of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC). Methods A total of 4469 female index patients with BC, 451 index patients with OC, and 2767 geographically matched female control individuals were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging rare missense variants in BARD1. All patients met the inclusion criteria of the GC-HBOC for germline testing and reported at least one relative with BC or OC. Additional control datasets (Exome Aggregation Consortium, ExAC; Fabulous Ladies Over Seventy, FLOSSIES) were included for the calculation of odds ratios (ORs). Results We identified LoF variants in 23 of 4469 BC index patients (0.51%) and in 36 of 37,265 control individuals (0.10%), resulting in an OR of 5.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.17–9.04; P

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer

Author

Nana Weber-Lassalle, Jan Hauke, Juliane Ramser, Lisa Richters, Eva Groß, Britta Blümcke, Andrea Gehrig, Anne-Karin Kahlert, Clemens R. Müller, Karl Hackmann, Ellen Honisch, Konstantin Weber-Lassalle, Dieter Niederacher, Julika Borde, Holger Thiele, Corinna Ernst, Janine Altmüller, Guido Neidhardt, Peter Nürnberg, Kristina Klaschik, Christopher Schroeder, Konrad Platzer, Alexander E. Volk, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Walter Just, Bernd Auber, Christian Kubisch, Gunnar Schmidt, Judit Horvath, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Norbert Arnold, Bernd Dworniczak, Kerstin Rhiem, Alfons Meindl, Rita K. Schmutzler, and Eric Hahnen

Subjects
Breast cancer, Ovarian cancer, BRIP1 gene, Germline mutations, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Abstract Background Germline mutations in the BRIP1 gene have been described as conferring a moderate risk for ovarian cancer (OC), while the role of BRIP1 in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis remains controversial. Methods To assess the role of deleterious BRIP1 germline mutations in BC/OC predisposition, 6341 well-characterized index patients with BC, 706 index patients with OC, and 2189 geographically matched female controls were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging missense variants. All index patients met the inclusion criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for germline testing and tested negative for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Results BRIP1 LoF mutations confer a high OC risk in familial index patients (odds ratio (OR) = 20.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.02–36.57, P

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer

Author

Christoph Engel, Ellen Honisch, Walter Just, Eva Groß, Nana Weber-Lassalle, Dieter Niederacher, Juliane Ramser, Lisa Richters, Kristina Klaschik, Konrad Platzer, Peter Nürnberg, Guido Neidhardt, Clemens R. Müller, Norbert Arnold, Britta Blümcke, Christopher Schroeder, Corinna Ernst, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Andrea Gehrig, Gunnar Schmidt, Julika Borde, Bernd Auber, Holger Thiele, Janine Altmüller, Alfons Meindl, Konstantin Weber-Lassalle, Karl Hackmann, Bernd Dworniczak, Christian Kubisch, Anne-Karin Kahlert, Eric Hahnen, Kerstin Rhiem, Judit Horvath, Jan Hauke, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Alexander E Volk, and Rita K. Schmutzler

Subjects
Adult, 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, medicine.medical_specialty, Breast Neoplasms, Gene mutation, lcsh:RC254-282, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Breast cancer, Germline mutation, Loss of Function Mutation, Risk Factors, Ovarian cancer, Internal medicine, Humans, Medicine, Missense mutation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, ddc:610, Family history, Germline mutations, Genetic Association Studies, Germ-Line Mutation, Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, business.industry, BRIP1, Odds ratio, Middle Aged, BRIP1 gene, medicine.disease, lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group Proteins, Pedigree, 030104 developmental biology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Female, business, RNA Helicases, Research Article
Abstract

Background Germline mutations in the BRIP1 gene have been described as conferring a moderate risk for ovarian cancer (OC), while the role of BRIP1 in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis remains controversial. Methods To assess the role of deleterious BRIP1 germline mutations in BC/OC predisposition, 6341 well-characterized index patients with BC, 706 index patients with OC, and 2189 geographically matched female controls were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging missense variants. All index patients met the inclusion criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for germline testing and tested negative for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Results BRIP1 LoF mutations confer a high OC risk in familial index patients (odds ratio (OR) = 20.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.02–36.57, P

Published
2018

5. RAD51Cdeletion screening identifies a recurrent gross deletion in breast cancer and ovarian cancer families

Author

Nana Weber-Lassalle, Jan Hauke, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Rita K. Schmutzler, Lutz Garbes, Gioia Schnurbein, Guido Neidhardt, Heide Hellebrand, Alexandra Becker, Eric Hahnen, Stefanie Engert, Alfons Meindl, and Kerstin Rhiem

Subjects
Adult, Ovarian Neoplasms, Letter, Breast Neoplasms, Biology, medicine.disease, Confidence interval, Pedigree, Breast cancer, Surgical oncology, Relative risk, medicine, Cancer research, Humans, RAD51C, Female, Rad51 Recombinase, Homologous recombination, Ovarian cancer, Gene, Gene Deletion
Abstract

RAD51C is an integral part of the DNA double-strand repair through homologous recombination, and monoallelic mutations were found in ~1.3% of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer (BC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC) families. Several studies confirmed the occurrence of RAD51C mutations predominantly in BC and/or OC families, although with varying frequencies, clearly establishing RAD51C as a cancer-predisposing gene. There is ongoing debate whether pathogenic RAD51C alterations increase the relative risk for BC in addition to that for OC, which was estimated to be 5.88 (95% confidence interval = 2.91 to 11.88; P = 7.65 × 10(-7)).

Published
2013

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results