Search

Background Assessing survival risk is important for discussing treatment options with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. However, there are few reports from large-scale databases on the survival risk factors in ER+ ABC. The Safari study (UMIN000015168) was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 1072 Japanese patients receiving fulvestrant 500 mg mostly as a second- or later-line endocrine therapy for ER+ ABC. The follow-up data after the Safari study were examined, focusing on any relationship between clinicopathological factors and overall survival (OS) in ER+ ABC patients. Methods OS in patients with ER+ ABC was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox proportional hazards model in this study. Results A total of 1031 cases were evaluable for OS analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age ( Conclusions In ER+ ABC patients whose treatment history included fulvestrant, younger age, longer time from ABC diagnosis to fulvestrant use, no prior palliative chemotherapy use, PgR−, and lower histological or nuclear grade correlated positively with prolonged OS.

We herein report a case of second sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A 57-year-old woman underwent breast-conserving surgery including axillary clearance at Aichi Cancer Center on October 20, 2003. Recurrent tumor in the conserved breast was diagnosed in March 2006. She received SLNB using radioactive tracer. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy detected 2 parasternal lymph nodes as hot spots. No abnormal lymph nodes were revealed on preoperative computed tomography. Salvage mastectomy was performed along with dissection of the Rotter and infraclavicular lymph nodes and biopsy of the detected parasternal lymph nodes. Micrometastases were discovered in both parasternal lymph nodes detected as sentinel lymph nodes. No more metastases were seen in the other lymph nodes. Reoperative SLNB offers the possibility of detecting metastasis in residual lymph nodes and determining whether chemotherapy should be used.

Previous series concerning tamoxifen (TAM) rechallenge did not obtain satisfactory results. Using stricter criteria, we now assess the usefulness of readministration of TAM as an initial therapy for patients with recurrent breast cancer. The eligibility criteria were postmenopausal, estrogen receptor (ER) positive or unknown, at least 12 months of adjuvant TAM, a 6-month or longer drug-free period and no previous therapy after recurrence. A total of 10 patients were enrolled. TAM was administered in daily doses of 20 or 30 mg. The mean age of the patients at the time of recurrence was 64.8 years. The receptor status was positive in 8 patients and unknown in 2. The median disease-free interval (DFI) after mastectomy was 71.7 months. A complete response was observed in one patient, a partial response in 6, stable disease in 2, and progression in one. The response rate was thus 70%, with an additional two patients showing no progression over 6 months. Although only one patient with a DFI of less than 48 months showed a positive response, all patients with a DFI longer than 48 months showed a clinical response. The duration of response was less than 12 months in 3 patients and longer in 4. The post-adjuvant readministration of tamoxifen is a useful first choice therapy for postmenopausal recurrent breast cancer patients with positive ER and longer DFI.

To investigate the possible involvement of theBRCA1 gene in Japanese sporadic breast cancer we have analyzed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at theBRCA1 region (17q12-q22) in 101 sporadic breast cancers using 5 microsatellite markers, such asD17S250, D17S846, D17S855, D17S579, andNME1. The frequency of LOH in each markers was 14.9% (11/74), 11.9% (8/67), 14.3% (12/84), 5.3% (4/75), and 13.3% (9/ 68), respectively. The incidence of LOH in at least one of 5 markers was 23.8% (24/ 101). The LOH at theBRCA1 region did not significantly correlate with clinicopathologic factors. Despite using a microdissection method, the LOH frequency in our series was relatively lower than other reports, especially in Western countries. We suggest that theBRCA1 gene might play only a limited role as a tumor suppressor gene in the majority of Japanese sporadic breast cancers.