Search

Alloplastic breast reconstruction is safe in well-selected older women. The impact of timing of surgery on complication rates is unknown. This study aimed to determine the immediate (30-day) postoperative complication rates of older women who underwent immediate (IBR) and delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) with alloplastic techniques.The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was used to identify women ≥70 years old with in situ or invasive breast cancer who underwent either IBR or DBR (2005-2016). Outcomes included 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality.A total of 2,085 older women underwent alloplastic breast reconstruction of which 90% and 10% were IBR and DBR, respectively. Both groups had similar median age, body mass index, and frequency of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and steroid use. Tumors were mainly invasive in the IBR group (83.5%) and in situ in the DBR group (83.3%). IBR had significantly longer operative times (median 154 min vs 98 min, p 0.0001), but equal length of stay (median 3 days vs 3 days, p = 0.1). The 30-day overall morbidity (medical or surgical complication) rate was significantly higher in the IBR group (7.5% vs 1.0%, p 0.0004). Women with IBR were significantly more likely to develop infectious complications (6% vs 1%, p = 0.002). Cardiac/transfusion, pulmonary, thromboembolic, renal, and neurological morbidity rates were equal between groups. Thirty-day mortality rates were similar across both groups (IBR: 0.05% vs DBR: 0%, p = 0.74).While overall thirty-day postoperative complication rates in older women who undergo breast reconstruction were low, there were higher rates of infectious complications in the IBR cohort. The risks and benefits of alloplastic breast reconstruction should be discussed with older women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.

Objectives The information needs of cancer patients are highly variable. Literature suggests an improved ability to modulate personalised stress, increased patient involvement with decision making, greater satisfaction with treatment choices and reduced anxiety levels in cancer patients who have access to information. The aim of this project was to evaluate the effects of a mobile information application on anxiety levels of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Materials and methods An application was developed for use with Apple iPad containing information on basic breast cancer biology, different treatments used and surgical techniques. Content and face validity studies were performed. A randomized control trial was designed, with a 1:2 allocation. Data collected include basic demographics and type of surgery. Questionnaires used included: the HADS, Mini-MAC, information technology familiarity and information satisfaction. Results A total of 39 women participated. 13 women had access to an iPad containing additional information and 26 women acted as controls. The mean age was 54 and technology familiarity was similar among both groups. Anxiety and depression scores at seven days were significantly lower in control patients without access to the additional information provided by the mobile application (p = 0.022 and 0.029 respectively). Conclusion Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients is both multifactorial and significant, with anxiety levels directly correlating with reduced quality of life. Intuitively, information should improve anxiety levels, however, we have demonstrated that surgical patients with less information reported significantly lower anxiety. We advise the thorough testing and auditing of information initiatives before deployment.