Search

Bombesin along with several closely related neuropeptides elicit scratching behavior when administered centrally. The first part of the study was designed to determine the antagonistic effects of a novel phyllolitorin analogue [desTrp3,Leu8]phyllolitorin (DTP) on scratching induced by three peptides (bombesin, neuromedin-C, and [Leu8]phyllolitorin). In addition, the binding affinity of each peptide for the bombesin receptor site was determined. DTP (30 μg) inhibited scratching induced by these peptides, but unlike the peptides, DTP had no affinity for the bombesin site, thereby suggesting that DTP is displaying physiological antagonism through an unknown mechanism.

We used mu-opioid receptor-deficient (MOR-/-) mice to determine the effects of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor inverse agonist AM251 on feeding in the absence of MOR signaling. A single dose of AM251 at 0.6, 2 or 6 mg/kg caused similar dose-dependent suppression of food intake in wild-type and MOR-/- mice. Administration of AM251 at 3 mg/kg/day for 9 consecutive days also led to a similar reduction ( approximately 8%) in body weight in wild-type and MOR-/- mice. Our results suggest that MOR signaling is not necessary for cannabinoid-mediated effects on feeding and that physiological antagonism of opioid receptor tone might be required for the observed synergistic effects of a CB1 inverse agonist and an opioid receptor antagonist on feeding.

Substance P (SP) in the dose range 0.75–1.5 nmol exerts a potent stimulatory effect on ventilation after microinjection into the rat ventrolateral medulla oblongata (VLM; n. reticularis lateralis, n. paragigantocellularis lateralis). A significant but less pronounced effect is also seen in the dorsal medulla (DM; n. tractus solitarius). Somatostatin (0.6–1.8 nmol) inhibited ventilation and induced apnoea after microinjection into the VLM but not the DM. Serial microinjections of the two peptides showed a reciprocal antagonistic action in the VLM but not in the DM. The apnoea-inducing effect of SOM was blunted by SP while SOM reduced the ventilatory stimulation induced by SP. Extracellular single unit recordings were performed following the microiontophoretic application of SP and/or SOM to respiratory-related and non-respiratory-related neurons in the VLM and DM. Although a heterogeneous population of neurons were recorded from, the majority of respiratory-related units in the VLM responded with excitation to SP and inhibitory to SOM. A direct interaction between the peptides was seen in some respiratory-related units. The neurons not responding to either of the peptides were usually non-respiratory. Dorsal to the VLM, the type of response to the two peptides was less likely to be antagonistic and a wider distribution of response types were recorded. The results indicate a direct physiological antagonism between SP and SOM regarding their effects on respiratory regulation elicited in the VLM.