Search

The aim of this study was to characterize thoracic spinal neurons receiving convergent inputs from the esophagus, heart and somatic receptive fields. Extracellular potentials of single T3-T4 spinal neurons were recorded in pentobarbital anesthetized male rats. Thoracic and cervical esophageal distensions (TED, CED) were produced by water inflation of a latex balloon. A catheter was placed in the pericardial sac to administer bradykinin or a mixture of algogenic chemicals. 96/311 (31%) neurons responded to both TED and intrapericardial chemicals (IC) and 48/177 (27%) neurons responded to both CED and IC. Long-lasting excitatory responses were more frequently encountered (P<0.05) in esophagocardiac spinal neurons responding to TED (T-ECSNs, 62/91) than in neurons responding to CED (C-ECSNs, 23/47). Ninety-one percent of T-ECSNs and 98% of C-ECSNs had somatic fields on chest, axilla and upper back areas. Esophagocardiac convergence on thoracic spinal neurons provided a spinal mechanism that might mediate viscerovisceral nociception and reflexes., (Copyright 2004 Elsevier B.V.)

The aims of this study were to examine effects of urinary bladder distension (UBD) on T(3)-T(4) spinal neurons receiving cardiac and somatic noxious inputs and to determine the pathway involved in transmitting urinary bladder inputs to thoracic spinal segments. Extracellular potentials of single T(3)-T(4) neurons were recorded in pentobarbital anesthetized male rats. Either bradykinin solution (10(-5) M) or an allogenic mixture (adenosine 10(-3) M, bradykinin, histamine, serotonin, prostaglandin E2 10(-5) M each) was administered intrapericardially. UBD was produced by saline inflation (0.5-2.0 ml, 20 s). Of 487 neurons tested for responses to UBD, 70 were inhibited and 37 were excited. Seventy-six out of 336 neurons received convergent input from UBD and heart; 69/76 viscerovisceral convergent neurons had somatic fields. Spinal transection at rostral C(1) abolished UBD inhibition in 5/9 neurons; whereas transections at L(1)-L(2) abolished UBD inhibition in 3/3 cells tested. Results showed that T(3)-T(4) spinal neurons processing cardiac and somatic nociceptive information were primarily inhibited by input from the urinary bladder through either supraspinal structures or direct intraspinal pathways.

The purpose of this study in anesthetized rats was to determine the effects of stimulating cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferents (CPSA) and vagal afferents on C1-C2 descending propriospinal neurons. We hypothesized that inhibition of spinal sensory neurons produced by CPSA or vagus activation might relay in C1-C2 spinal segments. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 73 C1-C2 neurons whose axons were antidromically activated in lumbar segments. CPSA input excited 22 cells, inhibited two cells and excited/inhibited one cell, whereas vagal input excited eight cells and inhibited two cells. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that CPSA input can be processed in C1-C2 segments to produce neural modulation in distant spinal segments.

Selected patients with peripheral vascular disease can be treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) to improve blood flow in the limbs. However, the mechanisms producing these effects remain unclear. The present study was designed to investigate if SCS produces cutaneous vasodilation via antidromic activation of the unmyelinated C-fibers and/or the small myelinated fibers. SCS was applied to anesthetized rats with a ball electrode at the L2-L3 spinal level. In Protocol 1, effects of capsaicin were examined. Blood flow changes in the hindpaw induced by SCS were measured in the footpad with laser Doppler flowmeters. Topical application of capsaicin (1%) on the tibial nerve did not affect SCS-induced vasodilation at 30 and 60% of motor threshold (MT). However, the duration of vasodilation induced by SCS at 90% MT and at 10 times MT was significantly reduced after capsaicin application on the tibial nerve. In Protocol 2, antidromic compound action potentials (CAPs) of the tibial nerve were recorded in response to SCS. CAPs of the large and the small myelinated afferent fibers were observed in response to SCS at all intensities. However, even with SCS at ten times MT, CAPs of C-fibers could not be detected in the tibial nerve. In Protocol 3, antidromic CAPs of the dorsal root were measured in response to SCS. Antidromic CAPs of C-fibers in dorsal roots were evoked by SCS at >or=90% of MT. It is concluded that SCS-induced vasodilation at or=90% of MT may also involve antidromic activation of some unmyelinated C-fibers.

The purposes of this study were to examine responses of superficial (depth <300 microm) and deeper thoracic spinal neurons to chemical stimulation of cardiac afferents and effects of descending influences on these neurons. Extracellular potentials of single T(3)-T(4) neurons were recorded in pentobarbital anesthetized, paralyzed and ventilated male rats. A catheter was placed in the pericardial sac to administer 0.2 ml of a mixture of algogenic chemicals that contained adenosine (10(-3) M), bradykinin, histamine, serotonin, prostaglandin E(2) (10(-5) M). Fifteen of 55 (27%) superficial neurons responsive to intrapericardial chemicals were compared to 80/169 (47%) deeper neurons. All 15 superficial neurons that responded to cardiac afferents were excited (E), whereas 66 deeper neurons were excited, ten were inhibited and four showed excitation-inhibition. Spontaneous activity of superficial neurons with short-lasting excitatory responses was significantly lower than that of deeper neurons (P<0.05). Somatic receptive fields on chest, axilla, arm and upper back areas were found for 77/95 (81%) neurons that responded to intrapericardial chemicals. The proportion of somatic field properties and their sizes in superficial neurons were similar to deeper neurons. After cervical spinal transection, both spontaneous activity and responses to chemical stimulation of cardiac afferents significantly increased in six out of six neurons excited by intrapericardial injections. Results showed that chemical stimulation of cardiac afferents excited superficial T(3)-T(4) spinal neurons, whereas deeper neurons exhibited multiple patterns of responses. Some characteristics of subgroups of superficial neurons were quantitatively different from deeper neurons. Thoracic spinal neurons processing cardiac nociceptive information were under tonic descending inhibition.

Projection neurons located in high cervical segments of primates are generally excited instead of inhibited by cardiopulmonary spinal inputs, which enter thoracic dorsal roots. Thus, high cervical neurons with axons that either ascend to the thalamus or descend to thoracolumbar spinal segments can process and transmit excitatory cardiac information. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the excitatory effects observed to cardiopulmonary afferent stimulation are a universal response in high cervical projection neurons to spinal visceral inputs. Urinary bladder distension (UBD) was used to stimulate visceral afferent inputs that enter lumbosacral dorsal roots. Effects were determined on extracellular activity of either spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons or descending propriospinal neurons that were recorded in high cervical segments of anesthetized monkeys. Results showed that 17/34 STT neurons were inhibited by UBD and 3/34 STT neurons were excited. Widespread visceral inputs, therefore, can excite high cervical STT neurons but the majority of responsive STT neurons were inhibited by UBD. Effects of UBD on high cervical descending propriospinal neurons were significantly different from responses in STT neurons. Extracellular activity of fewer propriospinal neurons was affected by UBD and responses were more variable; 3/26 neurons were inhibited, 5/26 neurons were excited and one neuron was excited/inhibited by UBD. These results showed that the generally excitatory responses of high cervical projection neurons to cardiopulmonary inputs were not duplicated by stimulation of sensory input from the urinary bladder. Furthermore, results of this study indicated that effects of sensory inputs on spinal neurons might vary depending on axonal projections of the neurons examined., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.)

This study examined whether spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at intensities below motor threshold (MT) produces cutaneous vasodilation through sympathetic inhibition and/or antidromic activation of sensory fibers. SCS was applied to anesthetized rats with stimulus parameters used clinically, i.e. 50 Hz, 0.2 ms and stimulus intensities at 30, 60 or 90% of MT. SCS-induced vasodilation was not attenuated by hexamethonium, an autonomic ganglion blocking agent, but was abolished by CGRP-(8-37), an antagonist of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor. We concluded that SCS-induced vasodilation under the conditions of this study was mediated by peripheral release of CGRP via antidromic activation of sensory fibers.

Trigeminal, spinal and vagal afferent fibers overlap in C1-C2 segments. We hypothesized that trigeminal input from the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) can excite C1-C2 spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons receiving thoracic visceral or phrenic inputs. Effects of SSS stimulation were evenly divided among cells responding to each nerve stimulus; magnitude of responses to ipsilateral vagal input was greater in neurons excited by SSS input. Somatic fields of 80% of neurons responding to SSS stimulation included face areas innervated by the trigeminal nerve, whereas somatic fields of 89% of neurons unaffected by SSS stimulation were located only on areas innervated by cervical spinal nerves. Results are consistent with the idea that pain referred to trigeminal areas could originate in thoracic organs., (Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.)

Afferent input from the phrenic nerve enters mid-cervical spinal segments, and previous results in monkeys show that mid-cervical spinothalamic (STT) neurons are activated by groups II and III phrenic afferent input arising from the diaphragm. In rats, dorsal horn neurons in C1-C2 segments receive phrenic input stimulated above the heart, but are not activated by phrenic input arising from diaphragm or abdomen. It is not known if this differential organization occurs in primate STT neurons. We hypothesized that high cervical STT neurons in monkeys also would be preferentially activated by phrenic inputs from thoracic structures, such as the pericardium. We examined extracellular discharge rate of C1-C3 STT neurons for responses to electrical stimulation of phrenic nerve fibers. Responses to stimulation of ipsilateral phrenic fibers above the heart were compared to effects of input stimulated below the heart and also to effects of contralateral phrenic input. We concluded that upper cervical STT neurons are most strongly excited by ipsilateral input from small diameter phrenic fibers arising from thoracic structures, but that group III and IV input from diaphragmatic fibers as well as input from contralateral phrenic fibers have a lesser effect on C1-C3 STT neurons and thus might be involved in nociceptive processing., (Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.)

Effects of electrically stimulating the left stellate ganglion to activate cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent (CPSA) fibers were determined on C1-C3 dorsal horn neurons in anaesthetized rats. Fifty-two of 53 dorsal horn neurons affected by CPSA stimulation were excited and one neuron was inhibited. In 6 experiments, dorsal columns and ventrolateral funiculi were sequentially lesioned to determine neuronal pathways involved in CPSA activation of C1-C3 neurons. In 6 additional experiments, spinal transection at rostral C1 was used to determine the contribution of supraspinal relays. We concluded that CPSA input to C1-C3 segments travelled bilaterally in ventrolateral pathways, and that supraspinal relays were not required for CPSA excitation of C1-C3 neurons. These results suggest that neurons in C1-C3 segments might play an important role in processing visceral spinal afferent information.

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal stimulation site and parameters that result in the greatest changes in cutaneous blood flow during dorsal column stimulation (DCS). Laser Doppler flowmetry was used to assess cutaneous blood flow changes in both rat hindpaws during DCS with a unipolar ball electrode. We found that stimulating the dorsal column at the L2 spinal segment at 0.6 mA at either 25 or 50 Hz with a pulse duration of 0.2 ms resulted in the largest cutaneous blood flow increases in the rat hindpaw. In addition, the DCS response appeared to be limited primarily to the hindpaw ipsilateral to the site of DCS.

We tested the hypothesis that cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent (CPSA) input entering upper thoracic spinal segments relays in the cervical spinal cord to inhibit activity of lumbar spinothalamic tract (SST) cells and dorsal horn (DH) cells. Two sequential spinal transections in the same animal were made, one at rostral C1 and one at C4-C6 segments, to determine neuronal pathways involved in the inhibition. We concluded that inhibitory effects induced by CPSA and somatic stimulation might be mediated by propriospinal mechanisms located in upper cervical segments. Vagal inhibition required supraspinal pathways.

The purpose of this study was to examine effects of a noxious visceral stimulus, urinary bladder distension (UBD), on cells in the ventroposterolateral (VPL) nucleus of anesthetized monkeys. We hypothesized that processing of visceral information in the VPL nucleus of the thalamus is similar to spinothalamic tract (STT) organization of visceral afferent input. Urinary bladder distension excites sacral and upper-lumbar STT cells that have somatic input from proximal somatic fields; whereas, thoracic STT cells are inhibited by UBD. Extracellular action potentials of 67 neurons were recorded in VPL nucleus. Urinary bladder distension excited 22 cells, inhibited 9 cells, and did not affect activity of 36 cells. Seventeen of 22 cells excited by UBD also received convergent somatic input from noxious squeeze of the hip, groin, or perineal regions. No cells activated only by innocuous somatic stimuli were excited by UBD. Five of 9 cells inhibited by UBD had upper-body somatic fields. There was a significant tendency for VPL neurons excited by UBD to have proximal lower-body somatic fields that were excited by noxious stimulation of skin and underlying muscle (P less than 0.001). Antidromic activation of 4 thalamic neurons affected by UBD showed that visceral input stimulated by UBD reached the primary somatosensory (SI) cortex.

Studies were conducted to determine if electrical or mechanical stimulation of phrenic afferent fibers (PHR) would inhibit the activity of lumbosacral spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons. Twelve monkeys were anesthetized, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 78 STT neurons located in L2-S3 spinal segments. Electrical stimulation of PHR reduced the activity of 65%, did not affect 33%, and excited 1% of STT neurons. Mechanical stimulation of the diaphragm reduced the activity of 63%, did not effect 34%, and excited 1% of lumbosacral STT neurons. Distention of the urinary bladder (UBD) inhibited 52%, did not affect 23%, excited 23%, and elicited a biphasic response in 1% of STT neurons. However, there was no correlation between the effect of PHR and UBD or somatic classification of the neurons. We conclude that electrical or mechanical stimulation of PHR can produce a generalized inhibition of lumbosacral STT neurons. This inhibitory effect of PHR is similar to inhibitory effects reported for a variety of other afferent systems.

Responses to electrical and chemical stimulation of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and midbrain reticular formation (RF) were examined on extracellular activity of 28 spinoreticular tract (SRT) and 56 spinal neurons in T2-T6 segments of anesthetized cats. All cells received excitatory viscerosomatic convergent input from the left forelimb triceps region and from cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferents. Evoked activity that resulted from pinching the left triceps was reduced by PAG and midbrain RF stimulation (100 Hz, 100 microseconds, 50-500 microA). Visceral afferent input to the neurons was elicited during electrical stimulation of cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent fibers and following injection of bradykinin into the left atrium of the heart. Electrical stimulation of the PAG and adjacent RF decreased A-delta and C-fiber activation of these neurons produced during electrical stimulation of cardiopulmonary afferents and decreased the activity of cells during excitatory responses to intracardiac bradykinin. Electrical stimulation of the PAG or midbrain RF similarly decreased spontaneous and evoked cell activity. Selective activation of cell bodies with microinjection of glutamate into the PAG reduced the activity of 6 of 8 cells whereas glutamate injections into midbrain RF reduced the activity of only 3 of 13 neurons. This difference in the effectiveness of chemically stimulating the PAG vs midbrain RF was significant (P less than 0.05). These data demonstrate that (1) neuronal activity evoked by visceral afferent input from the heart was decreased by electrical stimulation of the PAG and midbrain RF and (2) a portion of this descending inhibition may be mediated by cell bodies in the PAG.