Search

cIMPACT-NOW (the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy) was established to evaluate and make practical recommendations on recent advances in the field of CNS tumor classification, particularly in light of the rapid progress in molecular insights into these neoplasms. For Round 2 of its deliberations, cIMPACT-NOW Working Committee 3 was reconstituted and convened in Utrecht, The Netherlands, for a meeting designed to review putative new CNS tumor types in advance of any future World Health Organization meeting on CNS tumor classification. In preparatory activities for the meeting and at the actual meeting, a list of possible entities was assembled and each type and subtype debated. Working Committee 3 recommended that a substantial number of newly recognized types and subtypes should be considered for inclusion in future CNS tumor classifications. In addition, the group endorsed a number of principles-relating to classification categories, approaches to classification, nomenclature, and grading-that the group hopes will also inform the future classification of CNS neoplasms.

Major discoveries in the biology of nervous system tumors have raised the question of how non-histological data such as molecular information can be incorporated into the next World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. To address this question, a meeting of neuropathologists with expertise in molecular diagnosis was held in Haarlem, the Netherlands, under the sponsorship of the International Society of Neuropathology (ISN). Prior to the meeting, participants solicited input from clinical colleagues in diverse neuro-oncological specialties. The present "white paper" catalogs the recommendations of the meeting, at which a consensus was reached that incorporation of molecular information into the next WHO classification should follow a set of provided "ISN-Haarlem" guidelines. Salient recommendations include that (i) diagnostic entities should be defined as narrowly as possible to optimize interobserver reproducibility, clinicopathological predictions and therapeutic planning; (ii) diagnoses should be "layered" with histologic classification, WHO grade and molecular information listed below an "integrated diagnosis"; (iii) determinations should be made for each tumor entity as to whether molecular information is required, suggested or not needed for its definition; (iv) some pediatric entities should be separated from their adult counterparts; (v) input for guiding decisions regarding tumor classification should be solicited from experts in complementary disciplines of neuro-oncology; and (iv) entity-specific molecular testing and reporting formats should be followed in diagnostic reports. It is hoped that these guidelines will facilitate the forthcoming update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.

Major discoveries in the biology of nervous system tumors have raised the question of how non-histological data such as molecular information can be incorporated into the next World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. To address this question, a meeting of neuropathologists with expertise in molecular diagnosis was held in Haarlem, the Netherlands, under the sponsorship of the International Society of Neuropathology (ISN). Prior to the meeting, participants solicited input from clinical colleagues in diverse neuro-oncological specialties. The present "white paper" catalogs the recommendations of the meeting, at which a consensus was reached that incorporation of molecular information into the next WHO classification should follow a set of provided "ISN-Haarlem" guidelines. Salient recommendations include that (i) diagnostic entities should be defined as narrowly as possible to optimize interobserver reproducibility, clinicopathological predictions and therapeutic planning; (ii) diagnoses should be "layered" with histologic classification, WHO grade and molecular information listed below an "integrated diagnosis"; (iii) determinations should be made for each tumor entity as to whether molecular information is required, suggested or not needed for its definition; (iv) some pediatric entities should be separated from their adult counterparts; (v) input for guiding decisions regarding tumor classification should be solicited from experts in complementary disciplines of neuro-oncology; and (iv) entity-specific molecular testing and reporting formats should be followed in diagnostic reports. It is hoped that these guidelines will facilitate the forthcoming update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ependymomas are the third most common pediatric brain tumor with an overall survival of ∼50%. Recently, we showed that telomerase [human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)] expression is a predictor of poor outcome in pediatric ependymoma. Thus, we hypothesized that ependymomas with functional telomerase may behave more aggressively and that these patients may benefit from anti-telomerase therapy. To address our hypothesis, we investigated the effect of telomerase inhibition on primary ependymoma cells harvested at the time of surgery, as no animal models or established cell lines are readily available for this tumor. The cells were characterized for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and hTERT expression, initial telomere length and telomerase activity. They were then subjected to telomerase inhibition (MST-312, 1 µM) and tested for effects on cell viability (MTT assay), proliferation (MIB-1), apoptosis (cleaved caspase 3) and DNA damage (γH2AX). After 72 h of telomerase inhibition, primary ependymoma cells showed a significant decrease in cell number ( P < 0.001), accompanied by increased DNA damage (γH2AX expression) ( P < 0.01) and decreased proliferative index (MIB-1) ( P < 0.01). Half showed an increase in apoptosis (cleaved caspase 3). These data suggest that telomerase inhibition may be an effective adjuvant therapy in pediatric ependymoma, potentially inducing tumor growth arrest in the short term, independent of telomere shortening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Congenital central nervous system (CNS) tumors are uncommon, accounting for 1% of all childhood brain tumors. They present clinically either at birth or within the first 3 months. Glioblastoma (GBM) only rarely occurs congenitally and has not been fully characterized. We examined clinicopathologic features and genetic alterations of six congenital GBMs. Tumors were seen by neuroimaging as large, complex cerebral hemispheric masses. All showed classic GBM histopathology, including diffuse infiltration, dense cellularity, GFAP-positivity, high mitotic activity, endothelial proliferation and pseudopalisading necrosis. Neurosurgical procedures and adjuvant therapies varied. Survivals ranged from 4 days to 7.5 years; two of the three long-term survivors received chemotherapy, whereas the three short-term survivors did not. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were used for FISH analysis of EGFR, chromosomes 9p21 ( p16/CDKN2A) and 10q ( PTEN/DMBT1); sequencing of PTEN and TP53; and immunohistochemistry for EGFR and p53. We uncovered 10q deletions in two cases. No EGFR amplifications, 9p21 deletions, or mutations of TP53 or PTEN were noted; however, nuclear p53 immunoreactivity was strong in 5/6 cases. Tumors were either minimally immunoreactive (n = 3) or negative (n = 3) for EGFR. We conclude that congenital GBMs show highly variable survivals. They are genetically distinct from their adult counterparts and show a low frequency of known genetic alterations. Nonetheless, the strong nuclear expression of p53 in these and other pediatric GBMs could indicate that p53 dysregulation is important to tumorigenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]