Search

Objective: To investigate the impact of stroke on health status and the effects of repetitive facilitation exercises (RFEs) for convalescent patients after stroke. Methods: The study was a prospective observational study of patients enrolled in an RFE programme. Between April 2008 and March 2012, 468 patients with stroke were enrolled in an intensive, comprehensive RFE programme. Patients participated in this interdisciplinary programme for 12 weeks, for an average of 5 hours per week. Before and immediately after the programme, several measures of rehabilitation outcomes and health-related quality-of-life were evaluated. Results: At baseline, most patients (95.4%) had modified Rankin scale scores of 3–5. Their health-related quality-of-life was significantly impaired, with physical and mental component summary scores on the Short Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36) of 30.7 and 35.8, respectively. After the RFE programme, all outcome measures improved significantly. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that convalescent patients after stroke may benefit substantially from RFE programmes in stroke rehabilitation centres, even when patients have impaired health status or high levels of healthcare utilization. Thus, an RFE programme is a simple yet highly effective means to improve rehabilitation outcomes and health-related quality-of-life, with a relatively low dropout rate. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of repetitive facilitative exercise (RFE) under surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Methods: This randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, pilot trial randomized 27 adults with severe arm impairment [Fugl-Meyer Arm scale (FMA) ≤ 20] due to stroke of 3-13 weeks duration into three groups and provided treatment on a 4-week, 40 minutes/day, 5 days/week schedule. The RFE-under-NMES group were given 100-150 repetitions of standardized movements of shoulder, elbow and wrist joints of their affected arm with concurrent low-amplitude NMES for each corresponding musculature. The RFE group was given the same exercise regimen but without NMES. The control group was treated with a conventional arm rehabilitation programme without NMES. FMA was assessed at baseline and 4 weeks. Results: All 27 participants (nine in each group) completed the trial. At 4 weeks, the RFE-under-NMES group evidenced significantly greater improvement compared with the control group on the FMA ( p = 0.003), but not with the RFE group ( p = 0.092). The RFE group showed improvement compared with the control group, but it was not significant ( p = 0.199). Conclusions: RFE under NMES is feasible in clinical settings and may be more effective than conventional rehabilitation in lessening arm impairment after sub-acute stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]