1. Distinct impaired patterns of intrinsic functional network centrality in patients with early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease
- Author
-
Jiong Zhou, Minming Zhang, Peiyu Huang, Tianyi Zhang, Xiaopei Xu, Xiaocao Liu, Yerfan Jiaerken, Xiao Luo, Zheyu Li, Shuyue Wang, Qingze Zeng, Yanv Fu, Shuai Zhao, and Kaicheng Li
- Subjects
Cognitive Neuroscience ,Middle temporal gyrus ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Behavioral Neuroscience ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Superior temporal gyrus ,0302 clinical medicine ,Alzheimer Disease ,Humans ,Medicine ,Cingulum (brain) ,Middle frontal gyrus ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Early-onset Alzheimer's disease ,Cerebral Cortex ,Resting state fMRI ,business.industry ,Postcentral gyrus ,05 social sciences ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,White Matter ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Neurology ,Neurology (clinical) ,Nerve Net ,business ,Neuroscience ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Parahippocampal gyrus - Abstract
Early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) involves multiple cognitive domains and shows more rapid progression than late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD). However, the difference in pathogenesis between EOAD and LOAD is still unclear. Accordingly, we applied intrinsic network analysis to explore the potential neuropathological mechanism underlying distinct clinical phenotypes. According to the cut-off age of 65, we included 20 EOAD patients, 20 LOAD patients, and 36 age-matched controls (19 young and 17 old controls). We employed resting-state functional MRI and network centrality analysis to explore the local (degree centrality (DC)) and global (eigenvector centrality (EC)) functional integrity. Two-sample t-test analysis was performed, with gray matter volume, age, gender, and education as covariates. Furthermore, we performed a correlation analysis between network metrics and cognition. Compared to young controls, EOAD patients exhibited lower DC in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG), parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), superior temporal gyrus (STG), and lower EC in the MTG, PHG, and postcentral gyrus. In contrast, LOAD patients exhibited lower DC in the STG and anterior cingulum gyrus and higher DC in the middle frontal gyrus compared to old controls. No significant difference in EC was observed in LOAD patients. Furthermore, both DC and EC correlated with cognitive performance. Our study demonstrated divergent functional network impairments in EOAD and LOAD patients. EOAD patients showed more complex network damage involving both local and global centrality properties, while LOAD patients mainly featured local functional connectivity changes. Such centrality impairments are related to poor cognition, especially regarding memory performance.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF