Search

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by homozygous deletion of SMN1 exons 7 and 8. However, exon 8 is retained in some cases, where SMN2 exon 7 recombines with SMN1 exon 8, forming a hybrid SMN gene. It remains unknown how the hybrid SMN gene contribute to the SMA phenotype., Method: We analyzed 515 patients with clinical suspicion for SMA. SMN1 exons 7 and 8 deletion was detected by PCR followed by enzyme digestion. Hybrid SMN genes were further analyzed by nucleotide sequencing. SMN2 copy number was determined by real-time PCR., Results: SMN1 exon 7 was deleted in 228 out of 515 patients, and SMN1 exon 8 was also deleted in 204 out of the 228 patients. The remaining 24 patients were judged to carry a hybrid SMN gene. In the patients with SMN1 exon 7 deletion, the frequency of the severe phenotype was significantly lower in the patients with hybrid SMN gene than in the patients without hybrid SMN gene. However, as for the distribution of SMN2 exon 7 copy number among the clinical phenotypes, there was no significant difference between both groups of SMA patients with or without hybrid SMN gene., Conclusion: Hybrid SMN genes are not rare in Japanese SMA patients, and it appears to be associated with a less severe phenotype. The phenotype of patients with hybrid SMN gene was determined by the copy number of SMN2 exon 7, as similarly for the patients without hybrid SMN gene., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The SMN genes, SMN1 and SMN2, are highly homologous genes which are related to the development or clinical severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Some alternative splicing patterns of the SMN genes have been well documented. In 2007, an SMN1 transcript with a full sequence of intron 3 was reported as the first intron-retained SMN transcript., Methods: Intron-retained SMN transcripts in various cells and tissues were studied using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. HeLa cells were used for subcellular localization of the transcripts and protein expression analysis with Western blotting., Results: Two intron-retained SMN transcripts were detected, which contain full sequences of intron 2b or intron 3. These transcripts were produced from SMN1 and SMN2, and ubiquitously expressed in human cells and tissues. Western blotting analysis showed no proteins derived from the intron-retained transcripts. Fractionation analysis showed that these intron-retained transcripts were localized mainly in the nucleus. Contrary to our expectation, the intron-retained transcript levels decreased during the treatment of cycloheximide, an inhibitor of nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), suggesting that they were not targets of NMD., Conclusion: Intron 2b-retained SMN transcript and intron3-retained SMN transcript were ubiquitously expressed in human cells and tissues. The intron-retained transcripts were mainly localized in the nucleus and decreased through non-NMD pathway., (Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder. Over 95% of SMA patients have homozygous deletions of the SMA-causative gene, SMN1. Thus, SMA carriers are usually diagnosed based on SMN1 copy number, with one copy indicating SMA carrier status. However, two SMN1 copies do not always exclude carrier status. In this study, we identified SMA carriers with two SMN1 copies., Subjects and Methods: From 33 families, 65 parents of genetically confirmed SMA patients were tested to determine SMA carrier status. Molecular genetic analyses, including multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay, were performed using blood samples from family members., Results: Of the 65 parents, three parents from three families had two SMN1 copies. Accordingly, the frequency of carriers with two SMN1 copies was 4.6%. Two of these families were further studied. Patient 1 was homozygous for SMN1 deletion. Patient 1's mother had two SMN1 copies on one chromosome, with deletion of SMN1 on the other chromosome ([2+0] genotype). Patient 1 inherited SMN1-deleted chromosomes from both parents. Patient 2 was compound heterozygous for two SMN1 mutations: whole-gene deletion and intragenic missense mutation, c.826T>C (p.Tyr276His). Patient 2's father had two SMN1 copies with the same intragenic mutation in one copy ([1+1 d ] genotype, d intragenic mutation). Patient 2 inherited the chromosome with an SMN1 mutation from the father and SMN1-deleted chromosome from the mother., Conclusion: SMA carriers with two SMN1 copies may be rare, but its possibility should be taken into consideration in carrier testing and counseling for SMA families or population-based carrier screening., (Copyright © 2017 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in SMN1. More than 95% of SMA patients carry homozygous SMN1 deletion. SMA is the leading genetic cause of infant death, and has been considered an incurable disease. However, a recent clinical trial with an antisense oligonucleotide drug has shown encouraging clinical efficacy. Thus, early and accurate detection of SMN1 deletion may improve prognosis of many infantile SMA patients., Methods: A total of 88 DNA samples (37 SMA patients, 12 carriers and 39 controls) from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper were analyzed. All participants had previously been screened for SMN genes by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) using DNA extracted from freshly collected blood. DNA was extracted from DBS that had been stored at room temperature (20-25°C) for 1week to 5years. To ensure sufficient quality and quantity of DNA samples, target sequences were pre-amplified by conventional PCR. Real-time modified competitive oligonucleotide priming-PCR (mCOP-PCR) with the pre-amplified PCR products was performed for the gene-specific amplification of SMN1 and SMN2 exon 7., Results: Compared with PCR-RFLP using DNA from freshly collected blood, results from real-time mCOP-PCR using DBS-DNA for detection of SMN1 exon 7 deletion showed a sensitivity of 1.00 (CI [0.87, 1.00])] and specificity of 1.00 (CI [0.90, 1.00]), respectively., Conclusion: We combined DNA extraction from DBS on filter paper, pre-amplification of target DNA, and real-time mCOP-PCR to specifically detect SMN1 and SMN2 genes, thereby establishing a rapid, accurate, and high-throughput system for detecting SMN1-deletion with practical applications for newborn screening., (Copyright © 2017 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Most spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients are homozygous for survival of motor neuron 1 gene (SMN1) deletion. However, some SMA patients carry an intragenic SMN1 mutation. Such patients provide a clue to understanding the function of the SMN protein and the role of each domain of the protein. We previously identified mutations in the Tudor domain and C-terminal region of the SMN protein in three Japanese SMA patients. To clarify the effect of these mutations on protein stability, we conducted expression assays of SMN with mutated domains., Patients and Methods: Patients A and B carried a mutation in SMN1 exon 3, which encodes a Tudor domain, c.275G>C (p.Trp92Ser). Patient C carried a mutation in SMN1 exon 6, which encodes a YG-box; c.819_820insT (p.Thr274Tyrfs). We constructed plasmid expression vectors containing wild-type and mutant SMN1 cDNAs. After transfection of HeLa cells with the expression plasmids, RNA and protein were isolated and analyzed by reverse-transcription PCR and western blot analysis., Results: The abundance of wild-type and mutant SMN1 transcripts in HeLa cells was almost the same. However, western blot analysis showed lower levels of mutant SMN proteins compared with wild-type SMN. In mutant SMN proteins, it is noteworthy that the level of the p.Thr274Tyrfs mutant was much reduced compared with that of the p.Trp92Ser mutant., Conclusions: SMN mutations may affect the stability and levels of the protein., (Copyright © 2017 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder caused by deletion or intragenic mutation of SMN1. SMA is classified into several subtypes based on clinical severity. It has been reported that the copy number of SMN2, a highly homologous gene to SMN1, is associated with clinical severity among SMA patients with homozygous deletion of SMN1. The purpose of this study was to clarify the genotype-phenotype relationship among the patients without homozygous deletion of SMN1., Methods: We performed molecular genetic analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 in 112 Japanese patients diagnosed as having SMA based on the clinical findings. For the patients retaining SMN1, the PCR or RT-PCR products of SMN1 were sequenced to identify the mutation., Results: Out of the 112 patients, 106 patients were homozygous for deletion of SMN1, and six patients were compound heterozygous for deletion of one SMN1 allele and intragenic mutation in the retained SMN1 allele. Four intragenic mutations were identified in the six patients: p.Ala2Val, p.Trp92Ser, p.Thr274TyrfsX32 and p.Tyr277Cys. To the best of our knowledge, all mutations except p.Trp92Ser were novel mutations which had never been previously reported. According to our observation, clinical severity of the six patients was determined by the type and location of the mutation rather than SMN2 copy number., Conclusion: SMN2 copy number is not always associated with clinical severity of SMA patients, especially SMA patients retaining one SMN1 allele., (Copyright © 2013 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)