Search

Primary progressive aphasia is a neurodegenerative disease that selectively impairs language without equivalent impairment of speech, memory or comportment. In 118 consecutive autopsies on patients with primary progressive aphasia, primary diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes (ADNC) in 42%, corticobasal degeneration or progressive supranuclear palsy neuropathology in 24%, Pick's disease neuropathology in 10%, transactive response DNA binding proteinopathy type A [TDP(A)] in 10%, TDP(C) in 11% and infrequent entities in 3%. Survival was longest in TDP(C) (13.2 ± 2.6 years) and shortest in TDP(A) (7.1 ± 2.4 years). A subset of 68 right-handed participants entered longitudinal investigations. They were classified as logopenic, agrammatic/non-fluent or semantic by quantitative algorithms. Each variant had a preferred but not invariant neuropathological correlate. Seventy-seven per cent of logopenics had ADNC, 56% of agrammatics had corticobasal degeneration/progressive supranuclear palsy or Pick's disease and 89% of semantics had TDP(C). Word comprehension impairments had strong predictive power for determining underlying neuropathology positively for TDP(C) and negatively for ADNC. Cortical atrophy was smallest in corticobasal degeneration/progressive supranuclear palsy and largest in TDP(A). Atrophy encompassed posterior frontal but not temporoparietal cortex in corticobasal degeneration/progressive supranuclear palsy, anterior temporal but not frontoparietal cortex in TDP(C), temporofrontal but not parietal cortex in Pick's disease and all three lobes with ADNC or TDP(A). There were individual deviations from these group patterns, accounting for less frequent clinicopathologic associations. The one common denominator was progressive asymmetric atrophy overwhelmingly favouring the left hemisphere language network. Comparisons of ADNC in typical amnestic versus atypical aphasic dementia and of TDP in type A versus type C revealed fundamental biological and clinical differences, suggesting that members of each pair may constitute distinct clinicopathologic entities despite identical downstream proteinopathies. Individual TDP(C) participants with unilateral left temporal atrophy displayed word comprehension impairments without additional object recognition deficits, helping to dissociate semantic primary progressive aphasia from semantic dementia. When common and uncommon associations were considered in the set of 68 participants, one neuropathology was found to cause multiple clinical subtypes, and one subtype of primary progressive aphasia to be caused by multiple neuropathologies, but with different probabilities. Occasionally, expected clinical manifestations of atrophy sites were absent, probably reflecting individual peculiarities of language organization. The hemispheric asymmetry of neurodegeneration and resultant language impairment in primary progressive aphasia reflect complex interactions among the cellular affinities of the degenerative disease, the constitutive biology of language cortex, familial or developmental vulnerabilities of this network and potential idiosyncrasies of functional anatomy in the affected individual. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary progressive aphasia is a neurodegenerative syndrome characterized by gradual dissolution of language but relative sparing of other cognitive domains, especially memory. It is associated with asymmetric atrophy in the language-dominant hemisphere (usually left), and differs from typical Alzheimer-type dementia where amnesia is the primary deficit. Various pathologies have been reported, including the tangles and plaques of Alzheimer’s disease. Identification of Alzheimer pathology in these aphasic patients is puzzling since tangles and related neuronal loss in Alzheimer’s disease typically emerge in memory-related structures such as entorhinal cortex and spread to language-related neocortex later in the disease. Furthermore, Alzheimer pathology is typically symmetric. How can a predominantly limbic and symmetric pathology cause the primary progressive aphasia phenotype, characterized by relative preservation of memory and asymmetric predilection for the language-dominant hemisphere? Initial investigations into the possibility that Alzheimer pathology displays an atypical distribution in primary progressive aphasia yielded inconclusive results. The current study was based on larger groups of patients with either primary progressive aphasia or a typical amnestic dementia. Alzheimer pathology was the principal diagnosis in all cases. The goal was to determine whether Alzheimer pathology had clinically-concordant, and hence different distributions in these two phenotypes. Stereological counts of tangles and plaques revealed greater leftward asymmetry for tangles in primary progressive aphasia but not in the amnestic Alzheimer-type dementia (P < 0.05). Five of seven aphasics had more leftward tangle asymmetry in all four neocortical regions analysed, whereas this pattern was not seen in any of the predominantly amnestic cases. One aphasic case displayed higher right-hemisphere tangle density despite greater left-hemisphere hypoperfusion and atrophy during life. Although there were more tangles in the memory-related entorhinal cortex than in language-related neocortical areas in both phenotypes (P < 0.0001), the ratio of neocortical-to-entorhinal tangles was significantly higher in the aphasic cases (P = 0.034). Additionally, overall numbers of tangles and plaques were greater in the aphasic than amnestic cases (P < 0.05), especially in neocortical areas. No significant hemispheric asymmetry was found in plaque distribution, reinforcing the conclusion that tangles have greater clinical concordance than plaques in the spectrum of Alzheimer pathologies. The presence of left-sided tangle predominance and higher neocortical-to-entorhinal tangle ratio in primary progressive aphasia establishes clinical concordance of Alzheimer pathology with the aphasic phenotype. The one case with reversed asymmetry, however, suggests that these concordant clinicopathological relationships are not universal and that individual primary progressive aphasia cases with Alzheimer pathology exist where distributions of plaques and tangles do not account for the observed phenotype. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]