Search

To provide a systematic review of the applications of 3D printing in gynecological brachytherapy. Peer-reviewed articles relating to additive manufacturing (3D printing) from the 34 million plus biomedical citations in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI/PubMed), and 53 million records in Web of Science (Clarivate) were queried for 3D printing applications. The results were narrowed sequentially to, (1) all literature in 3D printing with final publications prior to July 2022 (in English, and excluding books, proceedings, and reviews), and then to applications in, (2) radiotherapy, (3) brachytherapy, (4) gynecological brachytherapy. Brachytherapy applications were reviewed and grouped by disease site, with gynecological applications additionally grouped by study type, methodology, delivery modality, and device type. From 47,541 3D printing citations, 96 publications met the inclusion criteria for brachytherapy, with gynecological clinical applications compromising the highest percentage (32%), followed by skin and surface (19%), and head and neck (9%). The distribution of delivery modalities was 58% for HDR (Ir-192), 35% for LDR (I-125), and 7% for other modalities. In gynecological brachytherapy, studies included design of patient specific applicators and templates, novel applicator designs, applicator additions, quality assurance and dosimetry devices, anthropomorphic gynecological applicators, and in-human clinical trials. Plots of year-to-year growth demonstrate a rapid nonlinear trend since 2014 due to the improving accessibility of low-cost 3D printers. Based on these publications, considerations for clinical use are provided. 3D printing has emerged as an important clinical technology enabling customized applicator and template designs, representing a major advancement in the methodology for implantation and delivery in gynecological brachytherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This survey aimed to document the current practice patterns of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), including vaginal vault brachytherapy (VVB) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in the management of patients with endometrial cancer. A 30-item, multiple choice survey querying RT prescribing practices and planning techniques was distributed electronically to American Brachytherapy Society members in December 2018. Seventy-five surveys from 62 centers were completed. Eighty-nine percent of respondents practiced within the USA or Canada. Most (79%) respondents indicated a preference for recommending adjuvant VVB alone in FIGO Stage IB, Grade 2 margin and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) negative disease. For FIGO Stage IB, Grade 3, LVSI-positive disease, most respondents preferred incorporating EBRT either alone (33%) or with VVB (28%). For IIIC1, margin positive disease, VVB in addition to EBRT was most commonly recommended (75%). When planning adjuvant EBRT, 49% utilized CT simulation with both bladder full and empty. Internal target volume was utilized by 53%. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (53%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (19%) were commonly used planning techniques. The most common dose prescription was 45 Gy in 25 fractions (57%). When treating with VVB, 49% determined applicator size at the time of brachytherapy. Sixty-four percent planned treatments based on CT imaging with the applicator in situ and 33% repeated CT imaging before each subsequent fraction. The most common prescription was 21 Gy in three fractions prescribed to 0.5 cm depth (43%). This study identified variability in treatment recommendations and in both EBRT and VVB simulation and planning processes in postoperative endometrial cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The optimum adjuvant treatment for Stage II endometrial cancer patients is unknown. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is often considered the standard of care; however, retrospective series suggest that brachytherapy (BT) alone may be sufficient for selected patients. As randomized data are lacking, we used a large database to explore this question. Methods and Materials The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with pathologic International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage II disease. Demographic, clinic-pathologic, and treatment details were compared between patients. Multivariable analysis was used to determine factors associated with receiving radiation therapy (RT). To account for imbalances between groups, a matched-pair analysis was completed. Results Eight thousand one hundred forty patients were included. RT was associated with overall survival (OS), with EBRT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64), BT (HR 0.47), and combination (HR 0.54) showing increased OS on univariate analysis. Facility, urban location, diagnosis year, hysterectomy type, and chemotherapy did not reach significance. On multivariate analysis, RT was associated with OS, with EBRT (HR 0.69), BT (HR 0.60), and combination (HR 0.54) showing benefit. Using propensity-score matching, RT continued to show improved OS regardless of type: BT (82% vs. 73% 5-year OS) and EBRT (77% vs. 71%). BT as compared to EBRT had equivalent survival (81% vs. 79%, not statistically significant). Conclusion This study of over 8,000 patients demonstrates that adjuvant RT confers a survival benefit in Stage II endometrial cancer and supports the continued use of RT in these patients. BT alone may be reasonable in carefully selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) using a cylinder applicator is a standard treatment of intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. We conducted a retrospective study of the dosimetric and clinical outcomes at our institution with 2 single-channel applicators in patients receiving VBT. Methods and Materials One hundred thirty-six patients with endometrial cancer treated from 2006 to 2016 receiving VBT after definitive surgery were evaluated. Two cylinders were used with the distal dwell position 7.1–12.8 mm from the apex varying by diameter (short channel), and 3.2 mm from the apex (long channel). We prescribed 18–26 Gy in 3–4 fractions at 0.5 cm depth. Measurements of the distance from the apex to the prescription isodose line were taken from CT imaging. Student's t test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used with corrections for multiple comparisons. Results Patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 Stage I-II disease (70 Stage IA, 58 Stage IB, 9 Stage II). Mean cylinder apex dose was 95.2% and 154.7% of prescription ( p < 0.001), and mean distance from apex to the prescription isodose line was 0.54 mm and 3.5 mm ( p < 0.001) for the short- and long-channel cylinders, respectively. There were no significant differences in any toxicity between cylinders. Four patients (2.9%) had vaginal recurrence, all of whom were treated with the short-channel cylinder. Cylinder type was not associated with vaginal recurrence ( p = 0.27). Conclusions A cylinder applicator with a distal dwell position closer to the apex results in higher doses to the vaginal cuff and increased D 2cc to the bladder. All four recurrences were in the short-channel cylinder. Additional investigation into applicator design and impact on patient outcomes in larger cohorts with sufficient followup is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: Evaluation of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) to the vulvovaginal region both alone and in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for primary or recurrent gynecological malignancy. Methods and Materials: From 1998 to 2009, 37 women with a mean age of 68 years were treated with transperineal interstitial HDRB. Fifteen patients (40.5%) were treated for primary disease, whereas 22 (59.5%) patients were treated for recurrent disease. Median time to local recurrence was 31 months (2–312 months). Primary sites included endometrium (12), vulva (11), vagina (10), vulvovagina (1), cervix (1), and bladder (2). Thirty-one patients (83.7%) in this series were treated with radical intent, whereas 6 (16.3%) were treated with palliative intent. Radically treated patients received between 45 and 60Gy (median, 45Gy) of EBRT. The median number of days from EBRT to HDR boost was 5 days (1–35 days). The HDRB doses ranged from 11Gy in two fractions to 42Gy in six fractions (dose per fraction varied from 4 to 8.5Gy) and fractions were given at least 6–8h apart. Results: Eight of the 31 patients (26%) treated with radical intent relapsed locally. Eleven of 37 patients (30%) treated with either radical or palliative intent recurred locally. The 2- and 5-year local progression-free survival was 74% and 63.4%, respectively. The total progression-free survival, which includes local, locoregional/nodal, and distant recurrence, at 2 and 5 years, was 73.6% and 45.6%, respectively. With a mean follow-up of 27 months (3.8–111.9 months), the median survival for the patient group was 16.6 months with a 2- and 5-year overall survival of 47.7% and 36.4%, respectively. Acute Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 13 (35%) of the 37 patients (skin: 10, urinary: 2, genital: 2, gastrointestinal: 0). No acute Grade 4 toxicities were seen. A total of 10 of the 37 patients (27%) developed late Grade 3 toxicities. Five of the 22 patients (22%) treated for recurrent disease with radical intent developed Grade 3 toxicity (skin: 4, urinary: 2, genital: 1, radiation-induced fracture of acetabulum: 1, and gastrointestinal: 0), whereas 1 of the 6 patients treated with palliative intent had Grade 3 toxicity affecting skin. No late Grade 4 toxicities were seen. Conclusion: This retrospective series suggests that interstitial perineal HDRB is a safe and effective treatment option for primary or locally recurrent gynecological malignancies. It is a valuable option in patients who have received previous EBRT to the pelvis, achieving good local control with acceptable late treatment-related side effects. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]