Search

In fit patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard of care. For mobilization of CD34+ cells for ASCT, combined cytotoxic chemotherapy and G-CSF is commonly used. However, the importance of cytostatic chemotherapy for reliable mobilization remains unclear. This prospective randomized phase II non-inferiority trial compared G-GSF only (G) compared to standard chemotherapy/G-CSF (CG) for CD34+ mobilization. The primary endpoint was a less than 15% difference in successful stem cell collection ( ≥ 5.0 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg b.w. in a single day collection procedure without additional stimulation with plerixafor) with the G regimen. 136 patients were 1:1 randomized. With an 18% difference in favor of the CG therapy, the non-inferiority margin was not maintained (95% CI 1%, 34%, p = 0.04). The median total CD34+ yield was 9.99 × 10 6 /kg b.w. in CG patients and 7.42 × 10 6 /kg b.w. in patients with G-CSF alone (p < 0.001). Ultimately, 130 (96%) patients proceeded to HDCT with ASCT. There were no differences in adverse events, hematologic engraftment, quality of life, or pain perception between the groups. Our data indicate that G-CSF only is inferior to chemotherapy with G-CSF for peripheral CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Trial registration SNCTP #: SNCTP000002952; Trials.gov #: NCT03442673., Competing Interests: Competing interests MD received financial support for attending haematology meetings from Kite Gilead/Novartis and serves as an advisory board member for Novartis. There are no financial disclosures from any of the other authors. Ethics approval and consent to participate We confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The study had approval by the local Ethics Committee of Bern, Switzerland, with the decision number 2018-00615. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) represents 12-15% of all AML cases. Although CBF positivity infers a survival advantage, overall survival (OS) remains dismal. Treatment is with cytarabine/anthracycline-based chemotherapy induction followed by high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is reserved for relapse or for patients having not achieved MRD-negativity at high risk for relapse. The role of SCT in first complete remission (CR1) remains controversial and is considered in high risk conditions. In this retrospective, multi-national, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-based study, we identified 1901 patients with de novo CBF-AML who received an allo-SCT or autologous transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. 65.5% harbored t(8;21) and 34.4% inv(16). In this group, the majority (77%) were treated with allo-SCT in CR1. In multivariate analysis, treatment with allo-SCT was an independent and significant, negative predictor of NRM and OS (HR 4.26, p < 0.0001 and HR 1.67, p = 0.003) and among patients treated with allo-SCT, those treated with MSD had the best outcomes, comparable to those treated with ASCT. There was no interaction between the type of transplant and MRD status at time of SCT. In both, MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups, NRM was worse in the allo-SCT group (MRD-: 12.9% vs 5.2%, p = 0.007; MRD+: 10.6% vs 0%, p = 0.004). We therefore demonstrated that consolidation in CR1 with allo-SCT results in worse outcomes than ASCT. Whether consolidation with ASCT yields better outcomes than chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy in combination with Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin is yet to be investigated., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Bortezomib (Vel)- Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (Mel200) (Vel-Mel) has been utilised to intensify conditioning in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). This EBMT registry-based study compared Vel-Mel with Mel200 during upfront AHCT. Between 2010 and 2017, MM patients who received Vel-Mel (n = 292) conditioning were compared with 4,096 Mel200 patients in the same 58 centres. Pre-AHCT, compared to Mel200 patients, Vel-Mel patients had similar International Staging System (ISS) scores and cytogenetic risk profiles; a similar proportion had received bortezomib-based induction (85% and 87.3%, respectively) though they were younger with a better performance status. Vel-Mel patients were more likely to achieve CR post-induction (40.6% vs 20.3%, p < 0.001) and by day 100 of AHCT (CR/VGPR: 70.2 % vs. 57.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in 3-year PFS (49% vs 46%, p = 0.06) or early post-AHCT mortality. In multivariable analysis, Vel-Mel associated with inferior PFS (HR: 1.69 (1.27-2.25, p < 0.001) and OS (HR:1.46 (1.14-1.86,p = 0.002), similar to negative effects on PFS of advanced ISS (HR:1.56 (1.33-1.83, p < 0.001), high-risk cytogenetics (HR:1.43(1.18-1.74, p < 0.001) and poor post-induction response(<=PR)(HR: 1.43(1.25-1.62, p < 0.001) Overall, despite superior pre- and post-AHCT responses, there was no improvement in PFS or OS following Vel-Mel. This data supports the findings of the smaller prospective IFM study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of intermediate-risk (IR) in first remission (CR1) with no measurable residual disease (MRD negative), the choice of the best consolidation is questionable. 1122 adult patients from 196 centers, transplanted in 2010-21 were analyzed: 547 received an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 575 a Haploidentical donor transplant. Because of a significant interaction, comparisons were done separately for patients with wild-type FLT3 (FLT3-wt) and FLT3-ITD mutation (FLT3-ITD). In FLT3-wt patients, haploidentical transplants had two year lower relapse incidence (RI) (16.9% versus 32.6%; HR = 0.40, p < 0.001), higher NRM higher (17.2% vs 3.5%; HR = 7.02, p < 0.001), similar LFS (65.9% vs 63.8%; p = 0.37) and lower OS (73.2% vs 80.6%; HR = 1.69, p = 0.018). In FLT3-ITD patients, haploidentical transplants had two year lower RI (8.2% vs 47.8%; HR = 0.14, p < 0.001) higher NRM (20.2% vs 5.6%; HR = 3.43, p = 0.002), better LFS (71.5% vs 46.6%; HR = 0.53, p = 0.007) and similar OS (73.5% vs 61.9%; p = 0.44). In IR AML patients with FLT3-wt in MRD negative CR1, autologous stem cell transplantation is a valid option, while in patients with FLT3-ITD, haploidentical transplant is better. Whether autologous transplantation is superior to chemotherapy in FLT3-wt patients and the role of maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors remain to be studied., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

We retrospectively compared the impact of the conditioning regimen in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) that received high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from 2010 to 2021 with either high-dose cytarabine, etoposide and busulfan (BEA), busulfan with cyclophosphamide (BUCY) or busulfan and high-dose melphalan (BUMEL) registered in the EBMT database. Overall 1560 patients underwent ASCT, of which 156, 1143 and 261 received BEA, BUCY and BUMEL, respectively. Compared to BUCY and BUMEL, BEA patients were younger (p < 0.001) and less frequently had NPM1 mutations (p = 0.03). Transplant outcomes at 5 years with BEA, BUCY and BUMEL were: cumulative incidence of relapse 41.8%, 46.6% and 51.6%; non-relapse mortality (NRM) 1.5%, 5.2% and 7.3%; probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) 56.7%, 48.2% and 41.1%; and overall survival (OS) 71.3%, 62.3% and 56%, respectively. In multivariable analysis the BEA regimen showed significant improvement in OS compared to BUCY (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.83; p = 0.048) and BUMEL (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.94; p = 0.029). In conclusion, high-dose myeloablative combination chemotherapy with BEA offered improved outcomes compared to classical BUCY or BUMEL in patients with AML in CR1 undergoing ASCT., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Definite cure remains exceptional in myeloma patients even after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan (Mel) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Thus, improving efficacy of HDCT in MM remains an unresolved issue. This randomized phase II trial compared standard 200 mg/m 2 Mel HDCT to experimental HDCT with 200 mg/m 2 bendamustine, given both at days -4 and -3, combined with 100 mg/m 2 melphalan at days -2 and -1 (BenMel) before ASCT as first-line consolidation in myeloma patients. The primary endpoint aimed to identify at least a 15% improvement in the complete remission rate (stringent CR + CR) after HDCT with BenMel compared with Mel alone. A total of 120 MM patients were 1:1 randomized. The rate of sCR/CR after ASCT was higher in BenMel than in Mel treated patients (70.0% vs. 51.7%; p = 0.039). Three patients in the BenMel group (5.0%) had reversible acute renal insufficiency compared with none in Mel patients. Minimal residual disease negativity (<10-5) by flow cytometry was observed in 26 (45.6%) BenMel patients and 22 (37.9%) in the Mel group (p = 0.375). Our data suggest that BenMel HDCT is safe and improves the sCR/CR rate compared with standard Mel alone., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is suitable for consolidation of favorable-/intermediate-risk AML patients in CR1. However, ~50% of AML patients relapse after autologous HCT, and efficacy of subsequent salvage strategies including allogeneic HCT remains unclear. We studied 123 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT)/autologous HCT in CR1. In relapsing patients afterwards, we analyzed salvage treatments and outcomes focusing particularly on salvage allogeneic HCT. Of 123 patients, 64 (52%) relapsed after autologous HCT. Subsequently, 13 (21%) received palliative therapy, whereas 51 (79%) proceeded to salvage therapy with a curative intent. Of the 47 patients with a curative intent and who did not proceed directly to allogeneic HCT, 23 (49%) achieved CR2 or had ongoing hematologic CR1 despite molecular relapse. Finally, 30 patients (47%) received allogeneic HCT with estimated 3-year leukemia-free and overall survival rates of 33% and 43%. Hematologic remission at allogeneic HCT and lack of acute GvHD had a positive impact on OS and LFS (p < 0.05). Our study suggests that almost 80% of AML patients can undergo salvage therapy following relapse after front-line HDCT/autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT can provide cure in one third of patients relapsing after front-line HDCT/autologous HCT., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The optimal melphalan dose prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is not known for elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We analyzed data of all MM patients ≥65 years (n = 388) enrolled in the observational Swiss Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Registry. The median age was 67 years (65-77). Single ASCT was performed in 344 (88.7%) patients, with 259 patients (75.3%) receiving a melphalan dose of 200 mg/m 2 (MEL200), and 85 patients (24.7%) receiving lower doses (MELlow) (median 140 mg/m 2 , range 70-180 mg/m 2 ). MEL200 patients were slightly younger, and had a better renal function, but did not differ with regards to ISS stage, cytogenetic risk, remission status, and KPS. Overall mortality at day 100 was 1.5% without differences between the MEL groups (p = 0.621). Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the MEL200 and the MELlow group was 27.7 and 22.1 months, respectively (p = 0.294). Median overall survival (OS) in the MEL200 and in MELlow group was 91.2 and 61.2 months (p = 0.015). However, multivariate analysis showed no significant association of the melphalan dose and OS (HR 0.734; CI95% 0.264-2.038; p = 0.553). In conclusion, our data reveal no significant differences in safety and PFS for elderly myeloma patients treated with MEL200 or with lower MEL doses.

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells by leukapheresis is the preferred method to obtain grafts for autologous transplantation. Optimizing this procedure is important to warrant sufficient cell yield and reduce associated risks. To obtain sufficient to optimal yields of ≥ 2 to ≥ 5 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg body weight with a single leukapheresis procedure, success rates between 83 and 92% have been reported in children. In this retrospective study, we describe an improved protocol for autologous stem cell collection with an extraordinarily high success rate applied in 122 consecutive pediatric patients treated at the University Hospital Bern between 2004 and 2017. By comparing our data with previous studies, we identify two main optimizing factors: higher pre-apheresis CD34+ cell counts with a median of 130/µl and higher blood flow rates of 42-100 ml/min. Consequently, blood volumes processed were increased, duration of leukapheresis was shorter and CD34+ cell yields with a median of 19.0 × 10 6 /kg body weight were higher than previously described. Safety in our study was comparable to previous studies. Based on our data, we present an innovative algorithm for determination of the necessary blood volume and time of pediatric leukapheresis procedure.

Sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a curative option in relapsing germ cell tumor (GCT) patients, and complete remission (CR) after the first ASCT (early CR2) is associated with favorable outcome. Prognostic factors predicting early CR2 have not been investigated so far. We analyzed consecutive patients with a first relapse of GCT treated with three sequential cycles of carboplatin/etoposide-based HDCT with ASCT in the two largest academic centers in Switzerland. The cohort comprised 96 relapsing GCT patients, with 19 (19.8%) patients achieving early CR2 after the first HDCT cycle. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached in patients achieving early CR2, whereas they were 9.6 months (P = 0.0301) and 34.8 months (P = 0.0684) for patients missing early CR2. Patients with early CR2 more often had CR1 after first-line bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy (68.4 vs. 31.6%; P = 0.0037) and an interval longer than 2 years between initial diagnosis and first HDCT (36.8 vs. 15.6%; P = 0.0373), but less often a histology of mixed nonseminomatous tumor (46.8 vs. 21.1%; P = 0.0418). These data suggest that response to first-line chemotherapy, late relapse, and histology are associated with achieving early CR2 after a first HDCT with ASCT in relapsing GCT patients.