1. Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
- Author
-
Katrina T Ibonia, Lori A. Devlin, Henrietta S. Bada, Philip M. Westgate, Vanessa A. Concina, Loretta P. Finnegan, and Enrique Gomez Pomar
- Subjects
Male ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Scoring system ,Psychometrics ,Gestational Age ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Correlation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Neonatal abstinence ,Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ,030225 pediatrics ,Intensive care ,Linear regression ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Research ,Finnegan Score ,Infant, Newborn ,Gestational age ,Paediatrics ,Retrospective cohort study ,Level iv ,General Medicine ,Analgesics, Opioid ,Linear Models ,Opioid Withdrawal ,Female ,Factor Analysis, Statistical ,business ,Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome - Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop a simplified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS) that will highly correlate with scores ≥8 and ≥12 in infants being assessed with the FNAS.Design, setting and participantsThis is a retrospective analysis involving 367 patients admitted to two level IV neonatal intensive care units with a total of 40 294 observations. Inclusion criteria included neonates with gestational age ≥37 0/7 weeks, who are being assessed for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) using the FNAS. Infants with a gestational age MethodsA linear regression model based on the original FNAS data from one institution was developed to determine optimal values for each item in the sFNAS. A backward elimination approach was used, removing the items that contributed least to the Pearson’s correlation. The sFNAS was then cross-validated with data from a second institution.ResultsPearson’s correlation between the proposed sFNAS and the FNAS was 0.914. The optimal treatment cut-off values for the sFNAS were 6 and 10 to predict FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of these cut-off values to detect FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12 were 0.888 and 0.883 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.637 and 0.992 for a cut-off of 10, respectively. The sFNAS cross-validation resulted in a Pearson’s correlation of 0.908, sensitivity and specificity of 0.860 and 0.873 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.525 and 0.986 for a cut-off of 10, respectively.ConclusionThe sFNAS has a high statistical correlation with the FNAS, and it is cross-validated for the assessment of infants with NAS. It has excellent specificity and negative predictive value for identifying infants with FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF