1. Safety of switching from vitamin K antagonist to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in frail elderly with atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the FRAIL-AF randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Joosten LPT, van Doorn S, Hoes AW, Nierman MC, Wiersma NM, Koek HL, Hemels MEW, Huisman MV, Roes KC, van den Bor RM, Buding WF, Rutten FH, and Geersing GJ
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Administration, Oral, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic, Stroke prevention & control, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Anticoagulants administration & dosage, Anticoagulants adverse effects, Anticoagulants therapeutic use, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Frail Elderly, Vitamin K antagonists & inhibitors
- Abstract
Introduction: Clinical guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Frail elderly were under-represented in the landmark NOAC-trials, leaving a knowledge gap on the optimal anticoagulant management (VKA or NOAC) in this increasing population. The aim of the Frail-AF (FRAIL-AF) study is to assess whether switching from international normalised ratio (INR)-guided VKA-management to a NOAC-based treatment strategy compared with continuing VKA-management is safe in frail elderly patients with AF., Methods and Analysis: The FRAIL-AF study is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial. Frail elderly (age ≥75 years plus a Groningen Frailty Indicator score ≥3) who receive VKA-treatment for AF in the absence of a mechanical heart valve or severe mitral valve stenosis will be randomised to switch to a NOAC-based treatment strategy or to continue INR-guided VKA-management. Patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m
2 ) will be excluded from randomisation. Based on existing trial evidence in non-frail patients, we will aim to explore whether NOAC-treatment is superior to VKA-therapy in reducing major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Secondary outcomes include minor bleeding, the composite of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The follow-up period for all subjects is 12 months., Ethics and Dissemination: The protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands and by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, the Netherlands. All patients are asked written informed consent. Results are expected in 2022 and will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals as well as presentations at national and international conferences., Trial Registration Number: EudraCT: 2017-000393-11; The Netherlands Trial Registry: 6721 (FRAIL-AF study)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: G-JG and FHR report unrestricted institutional grants for performing research in the field of atrial fibrillation from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer Healthcare, BMS Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo. MEWH reports personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer Healthcare, BMS Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo, and grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), outside the submitted work. MVH reports grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Dutch Healthcare Fund and grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer Healthcare, BMS Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo and Aspen, outside the submitted work. All other authors (LPTJ, SvD, AWH, MCN, NMW, HLK, KCR, RMvdB and WFB) report no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF