Search

Introduction Obtaining informed consent for research includes the use of information sheets, which are often long and may be difficult for participants to understand. We conducted a trial to investigate whether consent procedures using a study information video coupled with electronic consent were non-inferior to standard consent procedures using participant information sheets (PIS) among youth aged 18–24 years in Zimbabwe.Methods The trial was nested within an endline population-based survey for a cluster-randomised trial from October 2021 to June 2022. Randomisation of participants to video or paper-based consent was at household level. We assessed non-inferiority in comprehension of the study using a questionnaire. The video method was accepted as non-inferior to standard consent procedures if the 95% CIs of the mean difference did not fall below the prespecified margin of 1.98. Thematic analysis was conducted on brief qualitative discussions with randomly selected youth to explore the acceptability of video and PIS within consent methods.Results Overall, 921 participants were enrolled (54% female). The median age was 20 (IQR 18–24) years. The mean comprehension score was 25.4/30 in both arms. The mean difference in comprehension between arms was −0.02 (95% CI −0.51 to 0.47) showing non-inferiority of the intervention in comprehension of study information. Youth (N=90) described both consent methods as interactive and inclusive. Those in the video consent arm felt it was exciting and youth focused. The use of imagery to explain procedures strengthened the perceived trustworthiness of the research. However, the high volume of information in both arms reduced acceptability.Conclusion Comprehension of study information using an information video is non-inferior to a paper-based consent method. Using information videos for consent processes shows promise as a person-centred and context-sensitive approach to enhance the informed consent process and should be encouraged by ethics committees.

Introduction COVID-19 vaccine acceptance research has mostly originated from high-income countries and reasons why youth may not get vaccinated may differ in low-income settings. Understanding vaccination coverage across different population groups and the sociocultural influences in healthcare delivery is important to inform targeted vaccination campaigns.Methods A population-based survey was conducted in 24 communities across three provinces (Harare, Bulawayo and Mashonaland East) in Zimbabwe between October 2021 and June 2022. Youth aged 18–24 years were randomly selected using multistage sampling. Sociodemographic characteristics, COVID-19 vaccination uptake and reasons for non-uptake were collected, and odds of vaccination was investigated using logistic regression.Results 17 682 youth were recruited in the survey (n=10 742, 60.8% female). The median age of participants was 20 (IQR: 19–22) years. Almost two thirds (n=10 652, 60.2%) reported receiving at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. A higher proportion of men than women had been vaccinated (68.9% vs 54.7%), and vaccination prevalence increased with age (23: 62.2%). Lack of time to get vaccinated, belief that the vaccine was unsafe and anxiety about side effects (particularly infertility) were the main reasons for not getting vaccinated. Factors associated with vaccination were male sex (OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.58 to 1.80), increasing age (>22 years: OR=1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.21), education level (postsecondary: OR=4.34, 95% CI 3.27 to 5.76) and socioeconomic status (least poor: OR=1.32, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.47).Conclusion This study found vaccine inequity across age, sex, educational attainment and socioeconomic status among youth. Strategies should address these inequities by understanding concerns and tailoring vaccine campaigns to specific groups.