Search

Abstract Background A pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm (PDAA) occurring in close association with median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is rare. A surgical procedure, such as median arcuate ligament (MAL) release, should be considered in such cases, but the operative criteria remain unknown. In this study, we reported an extremely rare case of PDAA with periarteritis nodosa (PAN) and MALS. Case presentation A 60-year-old man was transferred to our department with sudden onset of abdominal pain. We initially diagnosed his condition as a PDAA rupture with MALS based on enhanced computed tomography (CT). We promptly performed transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of PDAA, and the angiogram showed stagnant contrast agent in the celiac trunk, indicating total celiac artery occlusion. Follow-up enhanced CT three weeks after the first TAE clearly demonstrated newly formed, multiple aneurysms in the pancreaticoduodenal arcade and the hepatic artery. These findings indicated a systemic disorder, such as PAN or segmental arterial mediolysis, as the underlying cause. Therefore, we started corticosteroid therapy and performed diagnostic angiography to clarify the celiac artery’s patency. Contrary to the initial angiography, the second angiography showed sustained blood flow in the celiac artery. Nevertheless, we performed both extrinsic MAL release and consecutive TAE because of the risk of multiple aneurysms rupturing due to an uncontrolled systemic disorder and consequent hepatic ischemia. The patient had no episode of recurrence until one year of follow-up. Conclusions It is important to evaluate risk for hemodynamically unstable events to decide the best treatment strategy for MALS.

Abstract Background It has been reported that median arcuate ligament syndrome is closely associated with gastric or pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms. Hemodynamic state plays an important role in the formation of the aneurysms. These aneurysms are treated with open resection or endovascular exclusion. However, whether revascularization of the celiac artery can prevent the aneurysm formation is unknown. This report indicated a possibility that prophylactic revascularization for celiac artery stenosis resulted in decreased shear stress on the collaterals, which may otherwise be susceptible to new aneurysms. Case presentation This report describes a 51-year-old man who presented with epigastric pain at our hospital. According to contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT), he was diagnosed with a ruptured right gastric artery aneurysm and celiac artery stenosis caused by the median arcuate ligament (MAL). He had a vascular anomaly of the common hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). His vital signs were stable. We informed him of the situation and he chose open surgery rather than endovascular treatment. Following, we resected the aneurysm and transected the MAL. Intraoperative angiography after transection of the MAL showed the antegrade blood flow to the splenic artery instead of the retrograde flow via the prominent collaterals. Follow-up CT confirmed narrowed collateral vessels between the SMA and the celiac artery without de-novo aneurysms. Conclusion While the necessity of celiac artery release could be questioned, the present case supports the hemodynamic benefits of MAL transection in terms of de-novo aneurysm prevention.

Abstract Background Median arcuate ligament syndrome is a rare condition with abdominal symptoms. Accepted treatment options are open release of median arcuate ligament, laparoscopic release of edian arcuate ligament, robot-assisted release of median arcuate ligament and open vascular treatment. Here we aimed to evaluate the central priority of open vascular therapy in the treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome. Methods We conducted a monocentric retrospective study between January 1996 and June 2016. Thirty-one patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome underwent open vascular surgery, including division of median arcuate ligament in 17 cases, and vascular reconstruction of the celiac artery in 14 cases. Results In a 20-year period, 31 patients (n = 26 women, n = 5 men) were treated with division of median arcuate ligament (n = 17) or vascular reconstruction in combination with division of median arcuate ligament (n = 14). The mean age of patients was 44.8 ± 15.13 years. The complication rate was 16.1% (n = 5). Revisions were performed in 4 cases. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. The mean in-hospital stay was 10.7 days. Follow-up data were obtained for 30 patients. The mean follow-up period was 52.2 months (range 2–149 months). Patients were grouped into a decompression group (n = 17) and revascularisation group (n = 13). The estimated Freedom From Symptoms rates were 93.3, 77.8, and 69.1% for the decompression group and 100, 83.3, and 83.3% for the revascularisation group after 12, 24 and 60 months respectively. We found no significant difference in the Freedom From Re-Intervention CA rates of the decompression (100% at 12, 24 and 60 months post-surgery) and revascularisation (100% at 12 months, and 91.7% at 24 and 60 months post-surgery) groups during follow-up (p = 0.26). Conclusions Open vascular treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome is a safe, low mortality-risk procedure, with low morbidity rate. Treatment choice depends on the clinical and morphological situation of each patient.

Background: A pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm (PDAA) occurring in close association with median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is rare. A surgical procedure, such as median arcuate ligament (MAL) release, should be considered in such cases, but the operative criteria remain unknown. In this study, we reported an extremely rare case of PDAA with periarteritis nodosa (PAN) and MALS.Case Presentation: A 60-year-old man was transferred to our department with sudden onset of abdominal pain. We initially diagnosed his condition as a PDAA rupture with MALS based on enhanced computed tomography (CT). We promptly performed transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of PDAA, and the angiogram showed stagnant contrast agent in the celiac trunk, indicating total celiac artery occlusion. Follow-up enhanced CT three weeks after the first TAE clearly demonstrated newly formed, multiple aneurysms in the pancreaticoduodenal arcade and the hepatic artery. These findings indicated a systemic disorder, such as PAN or segmental arterial mediolysis, as the underlying cause. Therefore, we started corticosteroid therapy and performed diagnostic angiography to clarify the celiac artery's patency. Contrary to the initial angiography, the second angiography showed sustained blood flow in the celiac artery. Nevertheless, we performed both extrinsic MAL release and consecutive TAE because of the risk of multiple aneurysms rupturing due to an uncontrolled systemic disorder and consequent hepatic ischemia. The patient had no episode of recurrence until one year of follow-up.Conclusions: It is important to evaluate risk for hemodynamically unstable events to decide the best treatment strategy for MALS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Median arcuate ligament syndrome is a rare condition with abdominal symptoms. Accepted treatment options are open release of median arcuate ligament, laparoscopic release of edian arcuate ligament, robot-assisted release of median arcuate ligament and open vascular treatment. Here we aimed to evaluate the central priority of open vascular therapy in the treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome.Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study between January 1996 and June 2016. Thirty-one patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome underwent open vascular surgery, including division of median arcuate ligament in 17 cases, and vascular reconstruction of the celiac artery in 14 cases.Results: In a 20-year period, 31 patients (n = 26 women, n = 5 men) were treated with division of median arcuate ligament (n = 17) or vascular reconstruction in combination with division of median arcuate ligament (n = 14). The mean age of patients was 44.8 ± 15.13 years. The complication rate was 16.1% (n = 5). Revisions were performed in 4 cases. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. The mean in-hospital stay was 10.7 days. Follow-up data were obtained for 30 patients. The mean follow-up period was 52.2 months (range 2-149 months). Patients were grouped into a decompression group (n = 17) and revascularisation group (n = 13). The estimated Freedom From Symptoms rates were 93.3, 77.8, and 69.1% for the decompression group and 100, 83.3, and 83.3% for the revascularisation group after 12, 24 and 60 months respectively. We found no significant difference in the Freedom From Re-Intervention CA rates of the decompression (100% at 12, 24 and 60 months post-surgery) and revascularisation (100% at 12 months, and 91.7% at 24 and 60 months post-surgery) groups during follow-up (p = 0.26).Conclusions: Open vascular treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome is a safe, low mortality-risk procedure, with low morbidity rate. Treatment choice depends on the clinical and morphological situation of each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It has been reported that median arcuate ligament syndrome is closely associated with gastric or pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms. Hemodynamic state plays an important role in the formation of the aneurysms. These aneurysms are treated with open resection or endovascular exclusion. However, whether revascularization of the celiac artery can prevent the aneurysm formation is unknown. This report indicated a possibility that prophylactic revascularization for celiac artery stenosis resulted in decreased shear stress on the collaterals, which may otherwise be susceptible to new aneurysms., Case Presentation: This report describes a 51-year-old man who presented with epigastric pain at our hospital. According to contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT), he was diagnosed with a ruptured right gastric artery aneurysm and celiac artery stenosis caused by the median arcuate ligament (MAL). He had a vascular anomaly of the common hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). His vital signs were stable. We informed him of the situation and he chose open surgery rather than endovascular treatment. Following, we resected the aneurysm and transected the MAL. Intraoperative angiography after transection of the MAL showed the antegrade blood flow to the splenic artery instead of the retrograde flow via the prominent collaterals. Follow-up CT confirmed narrowed collateral vessels between the SMA and the celiac artery without de-novo aneurysms., Conclusion: While the necessity of celiac artery release could be questioned, the present case supports the hemodynamic benefits of MAL transection in terms of de-novo aneurysm prevention.