Search

Your search keyword '"EDITORS"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Descriptor "EDITORS" Journal bmc research notes
3 results on '"EDITORS"'

1. Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study

Author

Javad Aghazadeh-Attari, Kazhal Mobaraki, Jamal Ahmadzadeh, Behnam Mansorian, and Iraj Mohebbi

Subjects
STROBE statement, Observational studies, Occupational medicine and health, Authors, Reviewers, Editors, Medicine, Biology (General), QH301-705.5, Science (General), Q1-390
Abstract

Abstract Objective The present study applied the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement to observational studies published in prestigious occupational medicine and health journals. Results A total of 60 articles was evaluated. All sub-items were reported in 63.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.24–71.24%), not reported in 29.70% (95% CI, 20.2–39.2%), and not applicable in 6.56% (95% CI, 4.86–8.26%) of the studies. Of the 45 sub-items investigated in this survey, eight were reported 100% of the time, 13 were addressed in more than 90% of the articles, 22 were included in more than 75% of the studies, and 27 sub-items were applied in more than 50% of the articles published in the journals included in this study.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross‑sectional study.

Author

Aghazadeh‑Attari, Javad, Mobaraki, Kazhal, Ahmadzadeh, Jamal, Mansorian, Behnam, and Mohebbi, Iraj

Abstract

Objective: The present study applied the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement to observational studies published in prestigious occupational medicine and health journals. Results: A total of 60 articles was evaluated. All sub-items were reported in 63.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.24–71.24%), not reported in 29.70% (95% CI, 20.2–39.2%), and not applicable in 6.56% (95% CI, 4.86–8.26%) of the studies. Of the 45 sub-items investigated in this survey, eight were reported 100% of the time, 13 were addressed in more than 90% of the articles, 22 were included in more than 75% of the studies, and 27 sub-items were applied in more than 50% of the articles published in the journals included in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Quality of observational studies in prestigious journals of occupational medicine and health based on Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: a cross-sectional study

Author

Iraj Mohebbi, Jamal Ahmadzadeh, Behnam Mansorian, Kazhal Mobaraki, and Javad Aghazadeh-Attari

Subjects
0301 basic medicine, Occupational Medicine, medicine.medical_specialty, Biomedical Research, Epidemiology, Cross-sectional study, Statement (logic), lcsh:Medicine, Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology, Reviewers, General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Occupational medicine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, STROBE statement, medicine, Humans, 030212 general & internal medicine, Observational studies, lcsh:Science (General), lcsh:QH301-705.5, Occupational Health, Editors, 030109 nutrition & dietetics, Occupational medicine and health, business.industry, lcsh:R, Reproducibility of Results, General Medicine, Confidence interval, Research Note, Observational Studies as Topic, Cross-Sectional Studies, lcsh:Biology (General), Bibliometrics, Family medicine, Journals, Observational study, Periodicals as Topic, business, Authors, lcsh:Q1-390
Abstract

Objective The present study applied the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement to observational studies published in prestigious occupational medicine and health journals. Results A total of 60 articles was evaluated. All sub-items were reported in 63.74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.24–71.24%), not reported in 29.70% (95% CI, 20.2–39.2%), and not applicable in 6.56% (95% CI, 4.86–8.26%) of the studies. Of the 45 sub-items investigated in this survey, eight were reported 100% of the time, 13 were addressed in more than 90% of the articles, 22 were included in more than 75% of the studies, and 27 sub-items were applied in more than 50% of the articles published in the journals included in this study. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3367-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results