Search

Introduction: Hospital overcrowding where patient admissions exceed capacity is associated with worse outcomes in Emergency Department. Developments in emergency stroke care have been associated with improvements in stroke outcome but are dependent on effective, organised care. We examined if overcrowding in the hospital system was associated with negative changes in stroke outcome. Methods: Data on overcrowding were obtained from the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation (INMO) 'Trolley Count' database recording the number of patients cared for on trolleys/chairs in all acute hospitals each midnight. These were compared with quarterly data from the Irish National Audit of Stroke from 2013 to 2021 inclusive. Variables analysed were inpatient mortality rate, thrombolysis rate for ischaemic stroke, median door to needle time and median length of stay. Results: 579449 patient episodes were recorded by Trolley Watch over the period, (Quarterly Median 16719.5, range 3389–27015). Average Quarterly Thrombolysis rate was 11.3% (sd 1.3%) Median Quarterly Inpatient Mortality rate was 11.8% (Range 8.9-14.0%). Median Quarterly Length of stay was 9 days (8–11 days). Median quarterly door to needle was 65 min (45–80 min). Q1 was typically the worst for overcrowding with on average 19777 incidences (sd 4786). This was significantly higher than for Q2 (mean 13540 (sd 4785) p = 0.005 t-test) and for Q3 (mean 14542 (sd 4753) p = 0.03). No significant correlation was found between quarterly Trolley watch episodes and inpatient mortality (r = 0.084, p = 0.63), median length of stay r=-0.15, p = 0.37) or thrombolysis rate (r = 0.089 p = 0.61). There was an unexpected significant negative correlation between trolley watch data and median door to needle time (r=-0.36, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Despite increasing hospital overcrowding, stroke services still managed to preserve standard of care. We could find no association between levels of overcrowding and deterioration in selected indices of patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background To assist small hospitals in providing advanced stroke treatment, the Norwegian Directorate of Health has recommended telemedicine services. Telestroke enables specialists to examine patients via videoconferencing supplemented by teleradiology and to provide decision support to local health care personnel. There is evidence that telestroke increases thrombolysis rates. In Norway, telemedicine has mainly been used in non-critical situations. The first telestroke trials took place in 2008. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of telestroke trials and today's status with telestroke in Norway. Based on the divergent experience from two health regions in Norway, the paper discusses crucial factors for the integration of telestroke in clinical practice. Methods This is a descriptive study based on multiple methods to obtain an overview of the practice and experience with telestroke in Norway. A Web and literature search for 'telestroke in Norway' was performed and compared with a survey of telemedicine services at the country's largest hospitals. These findings were supplemented by interviews with key personnel involved in telestroke in two of four health regions, as well as hospital field observations and log data of telestroke transmissions from five of the hospitals involved. Results In Norway, experience in telemedicine for acute stroke care is limited. At the beginning of 2014, three of four regional health authorities were working with telestroke projects and services. Integration of the service in practice is challenging, with varying experience. The problems are not attributed to the technology in itself, but to organization (availability of staff on duty 24/7 and surveillance of the systems), motivation of staff, logistics (patient delay), and characteristics of the buildings (lack of space). Conclusions Prerequisites for successful integration of telestroke in clinical practice include realization of the collaboration potential in the technology with consistent procedures for training and triage, availability of the equipment, and providing advice beyond questions concerning thrombolysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke is a major public health concern, affecting millions of people worldwide. Care of the condition however, remain inconsistent in developing countries. The purpose of this scoping review was to document evidence of stroke care and service delivery in low and middle-income countries to better inform development of a context-fit stroke model of care.Methods: An interpretative scoping literature review based on Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage-process was executed. The following databases searched for literature published between 2010 and 2017; Cochrane Library, Credo Reference, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Science Direct, BioMed Central, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINNAHL), Academic Search Complete, and Google Scholar. Single combined search terms included acute stroke, stroke care, stroke rehabilitation, developing countries, low and middle-income countries.Results: A total of 177 references were identified. Twenty of them, published between 2010 and 2017, were included in the review. Applying the Donebedian Model of quality of care, seven dimensions of stroke-care structure, six dimensions of stroke care processes, and six dimensions of stroke care outcomes were identified. Structure of stroke care included availability of a stroke unit, an accident and emergency department, a multidisciplinary team, stroke specialists, neuroimaging, medication, and health care policies. Stroke care processes that emerged were assessment and diagnosis, referrals, intravenous thrombolysis, rehabilitation, and primary and secondary prevention strategies. Stroke-care outcomes included quality of stroke-care practice, functional independence level, length of stay, mortality, living at home, and institutionalization.Conclusions: There is lack of uniformity in the way stroke care is advanced in low and middle-income countries. This is reflected in the unsatisfactory stroke care structure, processes, and outcomes. There is a need for stroke care settings to adopt quality improvement strategies. Health ministry and governments need to decisively face stroke burden by setting policies that advance improved care of patients with stroke. Stroke Units and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rtPA) administration could be considered as both a structural and process necessity towards improvement of outcomes of patients with stroke in the LMICs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]