7 results on '"Dahrouge, Simone"'
Search Results
2. Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
- Author
-
Lofters, Aisha K., Mark, Amy, Taljaard, Monica, Green, Michael E., Glazier, Richard H., and Dahrouge, Simone
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
Liddy, Clare, Singh, Jatinderpreet, Kelly, Ryan, Dahrouge, Simone, Taljaard, Monica, and Younger, Jamie
- Subjects
MEDICAL referrals ,PRIMARY health care ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,POISSON distribution ,RELATIVE medical risk ,CROSS-sectional method ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background Several new primary care models have been implemented in Ontario, Canada over the past two decades. These practice models differ in team structure, physician remuneration, and group size. Few studies have examined the impact of these models on specialist referrals. We compared specialist referral rates amongst three primary care models: 1) Enhanced Fee-for service, 2) Capitation- Non-Interdisciplinary (CAP-NI), 3) Capitation - Interdisciplinary (CAP-I). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using health administrative data from primary care practices in Ontario from April 1st, 2008 to March 31st, 2010. The analysis included all family physicians providing comprehensive care in one of the three models, had at least 100 patients, and did not have a prolonged absence (eight consecutive weeks). The primary outcome was referral rate (# of referrals to all medical specialties/1000 patients/year). A multivariable clustered Poisson regression analysis was used to compare referral rates between models while adjusting for provider (sex, years since graduation, foreign trained, time in current model) and patient (age, sex, income, rurality, health status) characteristics. Results Fee-for-service had a significantly lower adjusted referral rate (676, 95% CI: 666-687) than the CAP-NI (719, 95% confidence interval (CI): 705-734) and CAP-I (694, 95% CI: 681- 707) models and the interdisciplinary CAP-I group had a 3.5% lower referral rate than the CAP-NI group (RR = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.943-0.987, p = 0.002). Female and Canadian-trained physicians referred more often, while female, older, sicker and urban patients were more likely to be referred. Conclusions Primary care model is significantly associated with referral rate. On a study population level, these differences equate to 111,059 and 37,391 fewer referrals by fee-for-service versus CAP-NI and CAP-I, respectively - a difference of $22.3 million in initial referral appointment costs. Whether a lower rate of referral is more appropriate or not is not known and requires further investigation. Physician remuneration and team structure likely account for the differences; however, further investigation is also required to better understand whether other organizational factors associated with primary care model also impact referral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Predictors of relational continuity in primary care: patient, provider and practice factors.
- Author
-
Kristjansson, Elizabeth, Hogg, William, Dahrouge, Simone, Tuna, Meltem, Mayo-Bruinsma, Liesha, and Gebremichael, Goshu
- Subjects
AGING ,CHRONIC diseases ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,CONTINUUM of care ,PRIMARY health care ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,REGRESSION analysis ,RURAL conditions ,STATISTICS ,CROSS-sectional method ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: Continuity is a fundamental tenet of primary care, and highly valued by patients; it may also improve patient outcomes and lower cost of health care. It is thus important to investigate factors that predict higher continuity. However, to date, little is known about the factors that contribute to continuity. The purpose of this study was to analyse practice, provider and patient predictors of continuity of care in a large sample of primary care practices in Ontario, Canada. Another goal was to assess whether there was a difference in the continuity of care provided by different models of primary care. Methods: This study is part of the larger a cross-sectional study of 137 primary care practices, their providers and patients. Several performance measures were evaluated; this paper focuses on relational continuity. Four items from the Primary Care Assessment Tool were used to assess relational continuity from the patient's perspective. Results: Multilevel modeling revealed several patient factors that predicted continuity. Older patients and those with chronic disease reported higher continuity, while those who lived in rural areas, had higher education, poorer mental health status, no regular provider, and who were employed reported lower continuity. Providers with more years since graduation had higher patient-reported continuity. Several practice factors predicted lower continuity: number of MDs, nurses, opening on weekends, and having 24 hours a week or less on-call. Analyses that compared continuity across models showed that, in general, Health Service Organizations had better continuity than other models, even when adjusting for patient demographics. Conclusions: Some patients with greater health needs experience greater continuity of care. However, the lower continuity reported by those with mental health issues and those who live in rural areas is concerning. Furthermore, our finding that smaller practices have higher continuity suggests that physicians and policy makers need to consider the fact that 'bigger is not always necessarily better'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Access to primary health care for immigrants: results of a patient survey conducted in 137 primary care practices in Ontario, Canada.
- Author
-
Muggah, Elizabeth, Dahrouge, Simone, and Hogg, William
- Subjects
- *
HEALTH services accessibility , *IMMIGRANTS , *MULTIVARIATE analysis , *PRIMARY health care , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *REGRESSION analysis , *LOGISTIC regression analysis , *DATA analysis software , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: Immigrants make up one fifth of the Canadian population and this number continues to grow. Adequate access to primary health care is important for this population but it is not clear if this is being achieved. This study explored patient reported access to primary health care of a population of immigrants in Ontario, Canada who were users of the primary care system and compared this with Canadian-born individuals; and by model of primary care practice. Methods: This study uses data from the Comparison of Models of Primary Care Study (COMP-PC), a mixed-methods, practice-based, cross-sectional study that collected information from patients and providers in 137 primary care practices across Ontario, Canada in 2005-2006. The practices were randomly sampled to ensure an equal number of practices in each of the four dominant primary care models at that time: Fee-For-Service, Community Health Centres, and the two main capitation models (Health Service Organization and Family Health Networks). Adult patients of participating practices were identified when they presented for an appointment and completed a survey in the waiting room. Three measures of access were used, all derived from the patient survey: First Contact Access, First Contact Utilization (both based on the Primary Care Assessment Tool) and number of selfreported visits to the practice in the past year. Results: Of the 5,269 patients who reported country of birth 1,099 (20.8%) were born outside of Canada. In adjusted analysis, recent immigrants (arrival in Canada within the past five years) and immigrants in Canada for more than 20 years were less likely to report good health compared to Canadian-born (Odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36,0.92 and 0.81, 95% CI 0.67,0.99). Overall, immigrants reported equal access to primary care services compared with Canadian-born. Within immigrant groups recently arrived immigrants had similar access scores to Canadian-born but reported 5.3 more primary care visits after adjusting for health status. Looking across models, recent immigrants in Fee-For-Service practices reported poorer access and fewer primary care visits compared to Canadian-born. Conclusions: Overall, immigrants who were users of the primary care system reported a similar level of access as Canadian-born individuals. While recent immigrants are in poorer health compared with Canadian-born they report adequate access to primary care. The differences in access for recently arrived immigrants, across primary care models suggests that organizational features of primary care may lead to inequity in access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Erratum: What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
Liddy C, Singh J, Kelly R, Dahrouge S, Taljaard M, and Younger J
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Comparison of primary care models in the prevention of cardiovascular disease - a cross sectional study.
- Author
-
Liddy C, Singh J, Hogg W, Dahrouge S, and Taljaard M
- Subjects
- Capitation Fee, Cardiovascular Diseases economics, Cardiovascular Diseases epidemiology, Community Health Centers organization & administration, Community Health Centers standards, Comorbidity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Evidence-Based Practice economics, Fee-for-Service Plans, Guideline Adherence economics, Guideline Adherence statistics & numerical data, Humans, Medical Audit, Models, Economic, Models, Organizational, Ontario epidemiology, Primary Health Care classification, Primary Health Care standards, Reimbursement Mechanisms classification, Reimbursement Mechanisms statistics & numerical data, Cardiovascular Diseases prevention & control, Community Health Centers economics, Evidence-Based Practice statistics & numerical data, Primary Health Care economics, Reimbursement Mechanisms economics
- Abstract
Background: Primary care providers play an important role in preventing and managing cardiovascular disease. This study compared the quality of preventive cardiovascular care delivery amongst different primary care models., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a larger randomized control trial, known as the Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) through Outreach Facilitation. Using baseline data collected through IDOCC, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 82 primary care practices from three delivery models in Eastern Ontario, Canada: 43 fee-for-service, 27 blended-capitation and 12 community health centres with salary-based physicians. Medical chart audits from 4,808 patients with or at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease were used to examine each practice's adherence to ten evidence-based processes of care for diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, weight management, and smoking cessation care. Generalized estimating equation models adjusting for age, sex, rurality, number of cardiovascular-related comorbidities, and year of data collection were used to compare guideline adherence amongst the three models., Results: The percentage of patients with diabetes that received two hemoglobin A1c tests during the study year was significantly higher in community health centres (69%) than in fee-for-service (45%) practices (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.4 [95% CI 1.4-4.2], p = 0.001). Blended capitation practices had a significantly higher percentage of patients who had their waistlines monitored than in fee-for-service practices (19% vs. 5%, AOR = 3.7 [1.8-7.8], p = 0.0006), and who were recommended a smoking cessation drug when compared to community health centres (33% vs. 16%, AOR = 2.4 [1.3-4.6], p = 0.007). Overall, quality of diabetes care was higher in community health centres, while smoking cessation care and weight management was higher in the blended-capitation models. Fee-for-service practices had the greatest gaps in care, most noticeably in diabetes care and weight management., Conclusions: This study adds to the evidence suggesting that primary care delivery model impacts quality of care. These findings support current Ontario reforms to move away from the traditional fee-for-service practice., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00574808.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.