Search

Abstract Background Older patients are underrepresented in the clinical trials that determine the standards of care for oncological treatment. We conducted a review to identify whether there have been age-restrictive inclusion criteria in clinical trials over the last twenty five years, focusing on patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. Methods A search strategy was developed encompassing Embase, PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases. Completed phase III randomised controlled trials evaluating systemic anti-cancer therapies in metastatic gastroesophageal malignancies from 1st January 1995 to 18th November 2020 were identified. These were screened for eligibility using reference management software (Covidence; Veritas Health Innovation Ltd). Data including age inclusion/exclusion criteria and median age of participants were recorded. The percentage of patients ≥ 65 enrolled was collected where available. The change over time in the proportion of studies using an upper age exclusion was estimated using a linear probability model. Results Three hundred sixty-three phase III studies were identified and screened, with 66 trials remaining for final analysis. The majority of trials were Asian (48%; n = 32) and predominantly evaluated gastric malignancies, (86%; n = 56). The median age of participants was 62 (range 18–94). Thirty-two percent (n = 21) of studies specified an upper age limit for inclusion and over half of these were Asian studies. The median age of exclusion was 75 (range 65–80). All studies prior to 2003 used an upper age exclusion (n = 12); whereas only 9 that started in 2003 or later did (17%). Among later studies, there was a very modest downward yearly-trend in the proportion of studies using an upper age exclusion (-0.02 per year; 95%CI -0.05 to 0.01; p = 0.31). Fifty-two percent (n = 34) of studies specified the proportion of their study population who were ≥ 65 years. Older patients represented only 36% of the trial populations in these studies (range 7–60%). Conclusions Recent years have seen improvements in clinical trial protocols, with many no longer specifying restrictive age criteria. Reasons for poor representation of older patients are complex and ongoing efforts are needed to broaden eligibility criteria and prioritise the inclusion of older adults in clinical trials.

Abstract Background Classical MPNs including ET and PMF have a chronic course and potential for leukaemic transformation. Timely diagnosis is obligatory to ensure appropriate management and positive outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the mutational profile, clinical characteristics and outcome of ET and PMF patients in Pakistani population. Methods This was a prospective observational study conducted between 2012 and 2017 at NIBD. Patients were diagnosed and risk stratified according to international recommendations. Response to treatment was assessed by IWG criteria. Results Of the total 137 patients analysed, 75 were ET and 62 were PMF. JAK2 positivity was seen in 51 cases (37.2%), CALR in 41 cases (29.9%), while triple-negative in 17 (12.4%) cases. None of the patients in the present study were MPL positive. Overall survival for patients with ET and PMF was 92.5 and 86.0% respectively and leukaemia free survival was 100 and 91.6% respectively, at a median follow-up of 12 months. Leukaemic transformation occurred in 6.5% of MF patients; among them, JAK2 mutation was frequently found. Molecular mutations did not influence the OS in ET whereas in PMF, OS was shortest in the triple-negative PMF group as compared to the JAK2 and CALR positive patient groups. Conclusion This study shows a different spectrum of molecular mutations in ET and PMF patients in Pakistani population as compared to other Asian countries. Similarly, the risk of leukaemic transformation in ET and PMF is relatively lower in our population of patients. The factors responsible for these phenotypic and genotypic differences need to be analysed in large scale studies with longer follow-up of patients.