Search

Background: Cervical cancer is a tumor with high morbidity and mortality. The importance of inflammatory and metabolic parameters affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) has been investigated more intensively recently. We aimed to investigate the effect of glucose/c-reactive protein (CRP) ratio [GCR], which shows these two parameters together, on PFS in cervical cancer. Methods: We retrospectively included 90 patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. The effects of clinical variables, inflammatory and glycemic parameters on PFS and OS were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. The data were compared with the healthy control group of 90 individuals using the independent t test. The effect of parameters on mortality was analyzed using ROC curves and cut off values were determined. Results: Glucose, CRP, CRP/lymphocyte ratio (CLR) and GCR were statistically significant in predicting mortality (p < 0.05). Disease stage, glucose, CRP, CLR and GCR were associated with overall survival. CRP, CLR and GCR were associated with progression-free survival (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, GCR was prognostic for PFS (p = 0.025). GCR was statistically significant while compared with the patient and healthy control group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In cervical cancer, GCR rate was found to be prognostic independent of stage. Higher GCR rate was associated with longer PFS duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Some biomarkers collected from routine laboratory tests have shown important value in cancer prognosis. The study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of routine laboratory biomarkers in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to develop credible prognostic nomogram models for clinical application. Methods: A total of 727 patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate each biomarker's prognostic value, and independent prognostic factors were used to generate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) nomgrams. The efficacy of the nomograms were evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves, X-tile analysis and Kaplan‒Meier curves. Results: Ten significant biomarkers in multivariate Cox analysis were integrated to develop OS and PFS nomograms. The C-indices of the OS- nomogram in the training and validation sets were 0.885 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.810–0.960) and 0.850 (95% CI, 0.761–0.939), respectively; those of the PFS- nomogram in the training and validation sets were 0.903 (95% CI, 0.866–0.940) and 0.825 (95% CI, 0.711–0.939), respectively. ROC, DCA and calibration curves showed better clinical application value for the nomograms incorporating routine laboratory biomarkers. X-tile analysis and Kaplan‒Meier curves showed that the nomograms were stable and credible in evaluating patients at different risks. Conclusions: Nomogram models incorporating routine laboratory biomarkers, including NLR, MLR, fibrinogen, albumin and AB blood type, were demonstrated to be simple, reliable and favourable in predicting the outcomes of patients with EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few studies have focused on the impact of single-organ pulmonary metastases on progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Recognizing differences in prognosis and chemotherapeutic efficacy based on metastasized organs may help in optimizing treatment strategies. The exploratory study was conducted to evaluate the comparative clinical outcomes and prognoses of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer presenting with single-organ pulmonary metastases and treated with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study included 289 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with second-line folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. The response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were assessed in the participants. Results: Among the 289 patients enrolled, 26 (9.0%) had single-organ pulmonary metastasis with left-sided primary locations, lower levels of tumor markers at the initiation point of chemotherapy, a significantly higher disease control rate (96.2% vs. 76.7%, P =.02), and a longer progression-free survival (median 29.6 months vs. 6.1 months, P <.001) and overall survival (median 41.1 months vs. 18.7 months, P <.001) than patients with other forms of metastatic colorectal cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that single-organ pulmonary metastasis was an independent predictor of longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.35, P =.00075) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, P =.006). Conclusion: Single-organ pulmonary metastasis was a strong predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line chemotherapy; this provides preliminary evidence for medical guidelines and clinical decision-making on novel therapeutic strategies for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy has several potential advantages over upfront surgery in patients with localized pancreatic cancer; more patients receive systemic treatment, fewer patients undergo futile surgery, and R0 resection rates are higher, thereby possibly improving overall survival (OS). Two recent randomized trials have suggested benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy over upfront surgery, both including single-agent chemotherapy regimens. Potentially, the multi-agent FOLFIRINOX regimen (5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) may further improve outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting for localized pancreatic cancer, but randomized studies are needed. The PREOPANC-2 trial investigates whether neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX improves OS compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients.Methods: This nationwide multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial includes patients with pathologically confirmed resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with a WHO performance score of 0 or 1. Resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as no arterial and ≤ 90 degrees venous involvement; borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as ≤90 degrees arterial and ≤ 270 degrees venous involvement without occlusion. Patients receive 8 cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by surgery without adjuvant treatment (arm A), or 3 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine with hypofractionated radiotherapy (36 Gy in 15 fractions) during the second cycle, followed by surgery and 4 cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine (arm B). The primary endpoint is OS by intention-to-treat. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, quality of life, resection rate, and R0 resection rate. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power, 252 events are needed. The number of events is expected to be reached after inclusion of 368 eligible patients assuming an accrual period of 3 years and 1.5 years follow-up.Discussion: The PREOPANC-2 trial directly compares two neoadjuvant regimens for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Our study will provide evidence on the neoadjuvant treatment of choice for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.Trial Registration: Primary registry and trial identifying number: EudraCT: 2017-002036-17 . Date of registration: March 6, 2018. Secondary identifying numbers: The Netherlands National Trial Register - NL7094 , NL61961.078.17, MEC-2018-004. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gemcitabine/erlotinib treatment offers limited benefit in unselected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Development of skin rash has been associated with favorable outcomes in patients treated with gemcitabine/erlotinib. This study aimed to extend knowledge on the effectiveness of gemcitabine/erlotinib in metastatic PDAC in the context of clinical practice and with focus on skin rash.Methods: This multicenter, non-interventional study enrolled 376 patients with metastatic PDAC receiving gemcitabine/erlotinib. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in patients with skin rash versus no skin rash. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), treatment satisfaction and safety. All data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Survival time and time to disease progression were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Effectiveness endpoints were analyzed for subgroups by skin rash grade (no rash, rash grade 1, rash grade ≥ 2), duration of erlotinib treatment (≤8 weeks, > 8 weeks), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at baseline (0-1, 2) and age (≤65 years, > 65 years).Results: Within the full analysis set (FAS; N = 270), 48 patients (17.8%) developed grade 1 rash, 51 patients (18.9%) grade ≥ 2 rash, while 171 patients (63.3%) did not develop a rash. Median OS of all patients was 9.11 months with an OS of 9.93 months in rash-positive and 8.68 months in rash-negative patients. Median PFS was 5.06 months for rash-positive and 4.11 months for rash-negative patients. PFS was longer in patients with rash grade ≥ 2 and in older patients (> 65 years). Examination using a multivariate Cox proportional model revealed that an age > 65 years was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio 0.640; p = 0.0327) and PFS (hazard ratio 0.642; p = 0.0026). Out of the 338 patients in the SAF, 310 patients (91.7%) experienced at least one AE, and 176 patients (52.1%) experienced skin-related side effects, all of which were CTC grade 1 to 3.Conclusions: Comparing rash-positive with rash-negative patients showed no significant difference in survival. While patients with rash grade ≥ 2 and older patients (independent of skin reactions) showed longer PFS, this did not translate into prolonged OS. The study did not reveal new safety signals.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01782690, retrospectively registered on 4 February 2013. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study explored the effect of liver resection on perioperative circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and found that the prognostic significance of surgery was associated with changes in CTC counts in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: One hundred thirty-nine patients with HCC were consecutively enrolled. The time-points for collecting blood were one day before operation and three days after operation. CTCs in the peripheral blood were detected by the CellSearch™ System.Results: Both CTC detection incidence and mean CTC counts showed greater increases postoperatively (54%, mean 1.54 cells) than preoperatively (43%, mean 1.13 cells). The postoperative CTC counts increased in 41.7% of patients, decreased in 25.2% of patients and did not change in 33.1% of patients. The increase in postoperative CTC counts was significantly associated with the macroscopic tumor thrombus status. Patients with increased postoperative CTC counts (from preoperative CTC < 2 to postoperative CTC ≥ 2) had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than did patients with persistent CTC < 2. Patients with persistent CTC levels of ≥2 had the worst prognoses.Conclusions: Surgical liver resection is associated with an increase in CTC counts, and increased postoperative CTC numbers are associated with a worse prognosis in patients with HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]