Search

Background: Clonal evolution in AML originates long before diagnosis and is a highly dynamic process. Having a greater understanding of leukemogenesis may contribute to develop treatment strategies that target the tumor evolutionary process. However, dissecting leukemic transformation at the onset of AML is challenging without single-cell sequencing, and most clinical laboratories do not have infrastructure to perform these studies routinely. Patients with newly diagnosed AML may present dysplasia. If these residual, mature, dysplastic cells were generated before the differentiation blockage of blasts preceding leukemic transformation, it could be hypothesized that studying the genetic landscape of dysplastic cells and blasts could uncover the evolutionary process from dysplasia to AML. This hypothesis has never been investigated. Aim: Reconstruct clonal evolution from dysplasia to AML based on the genetic signature of dysplastic cells and leukemic blasts, analyzed using integrated MFC immunophenotyping and sorting with NGS. Methods: Presence of dysplasia according to aberrant phenotypic differentiation of the neutrophil, monocytic and erythroid lineages was investigated using MFC and EuroFlow MDS/AML panels in 283 newly diagnosed AML patients (median age 74; range 29-90). Patient-specific phenotypes were leveraged to isolate a total of 99 cell types from 22 AML cases for targeted (48 MDS/AML related genes) and whole-exome sequencing (WES), with a mean depth of 3246x and 141x, respectively. In patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) by MFC at the time of complete remission, tumor resistant cells were FACSorted for WES using patient-specific aberrant phenotypes. T cells were used as germline control in both approaches. Mutations were considered if ≥0.05 allele frequency in leukemic blasts or dysplastic cells and ≤0.2 in T cells. Results: We first assessed the applicability of our hypothesis by investigating how many patients show dysplasia at the onset of AML. Dysplastic cells were observed in 252 of 283 (89%) cases. Phenotypic abnormalities were more frequently noted in the neutrophil lineage (47%), followed by the monocytic (40%) and erythroid cells (13%). Up to 169/283 (60%) patients showed multi-lineage dysplasia. Only nine cases showed no signs of dysplasia, whereas the remaining 22 had undetectable hematopoiesis. Targeted sequencing of dysplastic cells and blasts in 16 patients uncovered three evolutionary patterns of leukemogenesis. Stable transition in those displaying identical mutational landscapes in blasts and residual mature dysplastic cells (9/16); clonal selection in cases where blasts originated from leukemic stem cells other than the ones driving dysplasia, due to mutations absent in blasts and present in dysplastic cells (4/16); and clonal evolution in cases showing new mutations in blasts onto mutations shared between these and dysplastic cells (3/16). Interestingly, most patients displaying stable transition from dysplasia to AML had mutated ASXL1, RUNX1 and/or TP53 (8/9). Mutations present in dysplastic cells while absent in blasts from patients showing a clonal selection evolutionary pattern, were more frequently detected in genes related to signaling pathways (eg JAK2, KRAS and NRAS). By contrast, clonal evolution was characterized by new mutations affecting FLT3ITD and STAG2. The higher throughput of WES of dysplastic cells and blasts from six patients unveiled a more complex dynamic process of leukemogenesis, with all three evolutionary patterns being detectable in nearly all cases. Most interestingly, we found patients with mutations in dysplastic cells and blasts at diagnosis, but not in MRD cells (eg NBPF1 and ZNF717); and patients showing mutations in dysplastic and MRD cells, but not in blasts at diagnosis (eg MUC2 and KIR2DL3). These findings uncover that genetic alterations that are critical in leukemic transformation and chemoresistance, may not overlap (Figure). Conclusions: We showed for the first time that it is possible to reconstruct leukemogenesis in nearly 90% of newly-diagnosed AML patients, using techniques that are commonly available in clinical laboratories. The possibility to identify the genetic drivers of leukemic transformation and chemoresistance, could be clinically meaningful to develop tailored treatment strategies aiming at the eradication of genetically diverse leukemic clones. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Prósper: Oryzon: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ayala: Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Perez-Simon: JANSSEN, TAKEDA, PFIZER, JAZZ, BMS, AMGEN, GILEAD: Other: honorarium or budget for research projects and/or participation in advisory boards and / or learning activities and / or conferences. San-Miguel: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, SecuraBio, and Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Montesinos: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paiva: Celgene, EngMab, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Research Funding; Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Sanofi and Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy.

Background: CTCs may be responsible for MM spreading and accordingly, their numbers in peripheral blood (PB) could be a potential surrogate marker for the rate of dissemination and overall tumor burden in bone marrow (BM). In such case, CTCs may be a powerful biomarker of malignant transformation and disease aggressiveness. Aim: To investigate the clinical significance of CTCs in patients with smoldering (SMM), newly diagnosed (NDMM) and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), and to compare the transcriptional profile of CTCs across the disease spectrum. Methods: Next-generation flow (NGF) cytometry was used to assess the percentage of CTCs in PB of 1,157 patients: 316 with SMM, 650 with NDMM and 191 with RRMM. In each disease setting, patients were sub-classified into three groups with undetectable, low and high percentage of CTCs. Cutoffs were defined using maximally selected rank statistics adjusted for time to progression (TTP) in SMM and progression free survival (PFS) in NDMM/RRMM. A subset of SMM patients (n=86) was enrolled in GEM-CESAR. Transplant eligible (n=374) and ineligible (n=276) NDMM, as well as RRMM patients, were homogenously treated according to the GEM2012MENOS65, GEM-CLARIDEX and GEM-KYCYDEX clinical trials, respectively. In 40 patients (2 SMM, 33 NDMM and 5 RRMM) paired CTCs and BM tumor cells were FACSorted and their transcriptional profile was analyzed using RNAseq. Differentially expressed genes were investigated using DESeq2. Results: CTCs were detected in 248/316 (78%), 597/650 (92%) and 170/192 (89%) of SMM, NDMM and RRMM patients. Median CTC frequencies were: 0.001% (0.05 CTCs/µL), 0.01% (0.64 CTCs/µL) and 0.005% (0.22 CTCs/µL), respectively. There were 79 genes differentially expressed between patient-matched CTCs and BM tumor cells (e.g., FLNA, EMP3, LGALS9, MUC1). These were functionally related with TNFα signaling and inflammatory response (enriched in CTCs), as well as to cell cycle and MYC targets (enriched in BM tumor cells). Interestingly, the enrichment of these signatures in CTCs and BM tumor cells was progressively more pronounced from SMM to NDMM and RRMM. Altogether, these data suggest that the CTC-based dissemination potential peaks at the stage of NDMM, which could be related to greater inflammation in BM and cell cycle arrest driving tumor cell egression into PB. There were significant associations between the percentage of CTCs and the 2/20/20 IMWG risk model in SMM, the ISS in NDMM, and high-risk cytogenetics in all three-disease settings. Untreated SMM patients (n=230) with high CTC levels (≥0.02%) showed ultra-high risk of transformation vs those with low and undetectable CTCs (median TTP of 11 months vs not reached [NR] in both; P < .0001). Notably, SMM patients with ≥0.02% CTCs enrolled in GEM-CESAR have not reached a median TTP; thus, early intervention abrogated the poor prognosis of high CTC levels. Transplant-eligible NDMM patients stratified by undetectable, low and high (≥0.2%) CTC levels showed median PFS of NR, 78 and 47 months, respectively (P < .0001). Significant risk stratification was further observed in transplant ineligible NDMM (median PFS: NR, 31 and 14 months, respectively, P = .002) and RRMM (median PFS: NR, 24 and 7 months, respectively, P = .004). In untreated SMM, multivariate analysis of TTP including CTCs, serum M-component (>2 g/dL), sFLC ratio (>20) and BM plasma cells (>20%) selected CTCs as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.61, P = .015) together with the M-component and sFLC ratio. In NDMM, multivariate analysis of PFS including CTCs, BM plasma cells counts by morphology and flow cytometry, ISS, LDH, cytogenetics and transplant eligibility showed that high CTC levels had independent prognostic value (HR: 1.43, P = .003). Only the achievement of undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) abrogated the poor prognosis of high CTC levels. Conclusions: This is the largest study investigating the role of CTCs in smoldering and active MM. Our results show that tumor cells are continuously trafficking in PB, possibly through a dynamic mechanism of egression that peaks in NDMM. Evaluation of CTCs in PB outperformed quantification of BM tumor burden in SMM and NDMM, and showed prognostic value in all three-disease stages. Thus, CTC assessment should be part of the diagnostic workup of MM. Early intervention in high risk SMM and undetectable MRD in NDMM may abrogate dismal outcomes associated with high CTC levels. Disclosures Puig: Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda and The Binding Site: Honoraria. Cedena: Janssen, Celgene and Abbvie: Honoraria. Oriol: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sureda: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. De Arriba: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Moraleda: Pfizer: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; MSD: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding. Terpos: GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldschmidt: Incyte: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grant; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grant; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or Provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roccaro: AstraZeneca,: Research Funding; Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC): Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica (FRRB), Transcan-2 ERA-NET: Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lahuerta: Celgene: Other: Travel accomodations and expenses; Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Sanofi: Consultancy. Ocio: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy; MSD: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Secura-Bio: Consultancy. Rosinol: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen and Takeda: Honoraria. Bladé Creixenti: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen and Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Mateos: AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird bio: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Sea-Gen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, SecuraBio, and Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paiva: Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Sanofi and Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene, EngMab, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Research Funding.

Background: Previous studies showed that MRD- pts after transplant may have detectable monoclonal protein through IFx, creating confusion regarding their prognostication. That said, MRD assessment in these pts was not performed with next generation techniques nor or in later time points. Additional discordances have been identified between multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and NGS, which were confirmed in recent analyses comparing NGF vs NGS. Aim: To characterize discordances between flow cytometry vs NGS and IFx through the investigation of immature B cells sharing the same B-cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) with MM cells. Methods: Progression-free survival (PFS) according to negative vs positive IFx was analyzed in 219 MRD- pts by MFC after transplant, enrolled in the GEM2000 and GEM2005MENOS65 trials. The same comparison was performed in 205 MRD- pts by NGF after consolidation in the GEM2012MENOS65 trial. MRD detection by NGS was compared to MFC or NGF in 140 and 104 cases, respectively. We performed NGS of BcR IG gene rearrangements (mean: 69,975 sequences) and WES (mean depth: 145x) in a total of 68 B cell samples isolated from the bone marrow (BM) of 7 MM MRD- pts by NGF after treatment (GEM2012MENOS65). These were intentionally selected to avoid contamination from MM plasma cells (PCs) during sorting of CD34 progenitors, B cell precursors, mature B cells and normal PCs. We investigated these populations for the presence of clonotypic BcR IG and somatic mutations detected in MM PCs sorted at diagnosis, using T cells as germline control. In another 10 untreated MM pts, we performed scRNA/BcRseq of total BM B cells and PCs (n=52,735), to investigate if the clonotypic BcR IG of MM PCs was detectable in other B cell stages defined by their molecular phenotype. Results: Among 219 MRD- pts by 4 color MFC after transplant, 76 (35%) showed positive IFx and identical PFS to those with negative IFx (medians of 63 vs 66 months, p=0.96). Similarly, 23/205 (11%) MRD- pts by NGF after consolidation showed positive IFx and identical PFS to those with negative IFx (4y rates of 87% vs 78.5%, p=0.35). Thus, albeit the higher sensitivity of NGF and the later time point (consolidation), approximately 1/10 MRD- pts by NGF continued showing positive IFx, and their outcome was as favorable as that of MRD- cases in CR. We then investigated discordances between flow cytometry and NGS. Among 35 MRD- pts by 4 color MFC, 21 (60%) were MRD+ by NGS, whereas 8/44 (18%) MRD- cases by NGF were MRD+ by NGS; only one of the latter 8 pts relapsed so far. Noteworthy, 9/29 MRD- pts by MFC or NGF showed MRD levels ≥10-4 by NGS, suggesting that other factors beyond sensitivity were accounting for the discordances between MRD assessed by MFC/NGF (in the PC compartment) vs NGS (in whole BM samples). NGS of BcR IG gene rearrangements in sorted BM cells from MRD- pts by NGF, uncovered the presence of MM clonotypes in normal PCs (4/7 pts) and in B cells (5/7 pts) at low frequencies (mean of 0.31% in both, range: 0.003% - 9.4%). These findings were confirmed by scRNA/BCRseq, which unveiled in 10/10 pts that clonotypic cells were confined mostly but not entirely within PC clusters. We next performed WES to investigate if genetic abnormalities present in MM PCs at diagnosis were detectable in the same BM cells sorted after treatment in MRD- pts. Surprisingly, 41/201 (20%) somatic mutations present in diagnostic MM PCs were detectable in CD34 progenitors (n=6/7), B-cell precursors (n=4/7), mature B cells (n=5/7) and phenotypically normal PCs (n=4/7). All somatic mutations shared by MM PCs and sorted BM normal cells were non-recurrent, and genes recurrently mutated in MM (ATM, DIS3, KRAS, LTB, MAX,) as well as copy number alterations (CNA) found in MM PCs, were undetectable in normal cells. Conclusions: Albeit more-sensitive NGF, 11% of MRD- pts continue showing positive IFx. This should not be regarded as a false-negative result, since these pts have similar outcome to those in CR and MRD-. Our findings also suggest that, at least in some pts, discordances between NGF and NGS could be attributed to immature clonotypic cells. However, these lack most somatic mutations and CNA found in MM PCs, and therefore cannot drive disease relapse. This would explain the favorable outcome of MRD- pts by NGF despite positive NGS. From a pathogenic standpoint, our study proposes that a mutated and clonally expanded lymphopoiesis precedes secondary driver mutations or CNA leading to the expansion of MM PCs. Disclosures García-Sanz: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: Research grants, Research Funding; IVS (Biomed 2-Euroclonality): Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria. Chatzidimitriou:Janssen: Research Funding. San-Miguel:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paiva:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

In MM patients relapsing after MRD-negativity, the disease could reemerge from immature cells or from undetectable MRD. However, it remains unknown if immature cells have the same genetic background as MM plasma cells (PCs), as well as the amount of MRD that persists below the limit of detection (LOD) of next-generation techniques. To obtain further insight, we compared the biological landscape of MM PCs at diagnosis to that of CD34 progenitors, B cells and normal PCs isolated from patients with negative MRD by next-generation flow (NGF) after treatment. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES, mean depth: 90x) with the 10XGenomics Exome Solution for low DNA-input as well as deep NGS of B-cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) gene rearrangements (mean, 69,975 sequences), in a total of 68 cell-samples isolated from the bone marrow (BM) of 7 MM patients with MRD-negativity by EuroFlow NGF after induction with VRD and auto-transplant (GEM2012MENOS65 trial). Patients with negative MRD were intentionally selected to avoid contamination with MM PCs during sorting of CD34 progenitors, B-cell precursors, mature B cells and normal PCs after induction and transplant. We investigated in these populations the presence of somatic mutations and clonotypic BcR Ig rearrangements detectable in MM PCs sorted at diagnosis, using peripheral blood T cells as germline control. We also performed WES in matched diagnostic MM PCs and MRD cells persisting after VRD induction in 14 cases as control. In another 6 patients with untreated MM, we performed single-cell RNA and BcR IG sequencing (scRNA/BcRIGseq) of total BM B cells and PCs (n=16,380) to investigate before treatment, if the clonotypic BcR IG sequence of MM PCs was detectable in other B cell stages defined by their molecular phenotype. We used multidimensional flow cytometry (MFC) to investigate the frequency of B cell clonality in BM samples from a larger series of 195 newly-diagnosed MM patients, prospectively enrolled in the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. Somatic mutations present in diagnostic MM PCs were detectable in the lymphopoiesis of 5/7 patients achieving MRD-negativity after treatment. In one case, out of 55 mutations present in diagnostic MM PCs, a single mutation in PCSK1N (VAF: 0.30) was detectable in normal PCs. In the other four patients, a total of 85 mutations were present in MM PCs and up to 10 (median VAF, 0.16) were found all the way from CD34 progenitors into B-cell precursors, mature B cells and normal PCs, but not in T cells. Of note, most mutations were reproducibly detected in each cell type after induction and after transplant. All somatic mutations shared by MM PCs and normal cells were non-recurrent, and genes recurrently mutated in MM (eg. ACTG1, ATM, DIS3, FAM46C, KRAS, LTB, MAX, TRAF3) were found in MM PCs but never in normal cells. Copy number alterations (CNA) were found only in MM PCs. By contrast, up to 513/827 (62%) mutations and 48/67 (72%) CNA were detectable in matched diagnostic MM PCs and persistent MRD cells, indicating that the few somatic variants present in normal cells were unlikely related to contaminating MRD below NGF's LOD. Accordingly, MM clonotypic BcR IG rearrangements were detectable in normal PCs (4/7patients) and in immature B cells (5/7 patients) but at much lower frequencies (mean of 0.02% in both). Of note, 9 additional clonotypes (mean 8.4%) were found in MM PCs of 5/7 patients (range, 1-3). scRNR/BcRIGseq unveiled that clonotypic cells were confined mostly but not entirely within PC clusters, and that in 1 patient another clonotype was detectable in mature B cells. Accordingly, using MFC we found in a larger series that 25/195 (13%) of newly-diagnosed MM patients display B-cell clonality (median of 0.7% BM clonal B cells, range 0.02%-6.3%). In conclusion, we show for the first time that MM patients bear somatic mutations in CD34 progenitors that specifically differentiate into the B cell lineage, likely before the disease onset. Because diagnostic, MRD (and relapse) MM PCs display great genetic similarity, these results suggest that undetectable MRD Disclosures Puig: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Martinez-Lopez:BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards and Non-Financial Support ; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Non-Financial Support ; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards and Non-Financial Support ; Incyte: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards; VIVIA Biotech: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Takeda, Amgen, Celgene and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosinol Dachs:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen and Takeda: Honoraria. Bladé:Jansen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen and Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Mateos:EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; unrestricted grants from Celgene, EngMab, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consultancy for Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Background Bone disease (BD) is a hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) and is characterized by severe skeleton damage, reduced quality of life and overall survival (1-2). Several findings indicated that IL-17 producing CD4+ T cells (Th17) play a central role in triggering MMBD and support MM cell growth mainly by IL-17 production. There is compelling evidence that miR-21 is a central player in Th17 effector functions. Our preliminary data have shown that miR-21 is highly upregulated in MM-Th17 isolated from patients with active BD as compared to MM with no active BD and controls. We found that inhibition of miR-21 in naive T cells (miR-21i-T cells) impaired differentiation towards Th17 in vitro, by reducing interleukin (IL)-17, IL-22, RANKL and RORC, leading to abrogation of osteoclast (OCL) bone resorption. Aims Based on these premises, we sought to explore miR-21 related underlying molecular networks that support pathogenic Th17 differentiation and function. As miRNAs may exert direct and indirect effects on gene expression and at post-transcriptional level, we performed a global head-to-head comparison by RNA-seq and proteomic -phosphoproteomic analysis on miR-21i-Th17. Then, we recapitulated and validated our findings in NOD/SCID gNULL mice, injected intratibially with miR-21i-T cells and MM cells. Methods RNAseq and proteomic/phosphoproteomic assays have been performed on in vitro differentiated Th17 cells originated from scramble control (SC) or miR-21i transfected naïve T cells (SC-Th17 and miR-21i-Th17 respectively) from 3 healthy donors through MARS-seq protocol adapted for bulk RNA and proteome/phosphoproteome analysis . Data have been analyzed through R by using different packages including limma, DESEQ2 and pheatmap. To perfom global proteome/phosphoproteome analysis, we conducted a mass spectrometry study of phosphopeptides protein extract from SC-Th17 and miR-21i-Th17, enriched using SCX-IMAC/TiO2. High-resolution LC-Ms/MS data were processed using Proteome Discoverer software Results In the presence of miR-21i, we found 109 upregulated and 22 downregulated proteins in the global proteome analysis of Th17 cells, while 90 and 18 phosphoproteins were up and down modulated, respectively. Paired analysis showed that 46 proteins are modulated in expression but not in phosphorylation, 23 proteins are modulated in phosphorylation but not in expression, while 85 proteins are modulated in both conditions. These data suggest that selective miRNA modulation interferes with a specific and limited group of proteins/phosphoproteins according to cell type and despite predicted pleiotropic miRNA activity. To understand whether miR-21i-Th17 undergo a "molecular reprogramming", we evaluated gene expression by RNA seq Analysis of miR-21-related molecular pathways in Th17 cells and found upregulation of STAT-1/-5a-5b, downregulation of STAT-3 and redirection of Th17 to Th1/activated like cells as shown by a pair-to-pair RNAseq and proteome/phosphoproteome analysis. These data indicate that miR-21 plays a central role in driving Th17 differentiation and function in a proinflammatory milieu such as MM-Bone marrow microenvironment (BMM). However, when miR-21 activity is strongly counteracted, pathogenic Th17 can switch to a Th1 like phenotype (STAT 1 dependent gene/protein upregulation). This switch may partly explain the attenuation of MMBD observed in vitro. To confirm our observation in vivo, we injected intratibially miR-21i exposed- or scramble miR (SC) exposed-naïve CD4+ T cells together with MM cells into gamma null SCID mice. We observed that mice injected with SC CD4+ naïve T cells presented severe local skeleton damage, while bone structure was preserved in miR-21i naïve CD4+ T cells injected mice. Conclusions Our data highlight the relevance of miR-21 in supporting Th17 mediated MMBD onset and progression. The possibility to "reprogram" MM Th17 by miR-21 modulation opens a new avenue to develop miR-21 targeting therapeutic strategies to counteract BMM-dependent MM development and related-BD. Figure Disclosures Paiva: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; unrestricted grants from Celgene, EngMab, Sanofi, and Takeda; and consultancy for Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Background: The transformation from a normal to a cancer cell is driven by the multistep acquisition of genetic alterations. Recently, shared mutations between clonal B cells in MBL/CLL and CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) have been identified. Similarly, a HPC origin of BRAFV600E mutations in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has been uncovered, strengthening the notion that at least a fraction of somatic mutations may occur in CD34+ HPC before the malignant transformation of some B cell neoplasms. Since almost all WM patients have mutated MYD88L265P, it is worthy to investigate if this disease follows a similar pathogenic process than that of MBL/CLL or HCL. Aim: Define the cellular origin of WM by comparing the genetic landscape of WM cells to that of CD34+ HPC, B cell precursors and residual normal B cells. Methods: We used FACSorting to isolate 57 cell subsets from bone marrow (BM) aspirates of 10 WM patients: CD34+ HPC, B cell precursors, residual normal B cells (if detectable), WM B cells, plasma cells (PCs) and T cells (germline control). Whole-exome sequencing (WES, mean depth 79x) was performed with 10XGenomics Exome Solution for low DNA-input due to limited numbers of some cell types. Single-cell RNA and B-cell receptor sequencing (scRNA/BCRseq) was performed in total BM B cells and PCs (n=32,720) from 3 IgM MGUS and 2 WM patients. Accordingly, the clonotypic BCR detected in WM cells was unbiasedly investigated in all B cell maturation stages defined according to their molecular phenotype. In parallel, MYD88p.L252P (orthologous position of the human L265P mutation) transgenic mice were crossed with conditional Sca1Cre, Mb1Cre, and Cγ1Cre mice to selectively induce in vivo expression of MYD88 mutation in CD34+ HPC, B cell precursors and germinal center B cells, respectively. Upon immunization, mice from each cohort were necropsied at 5, 10 and 15 months. Results: All 10 WM patients showed MYD88L265P and 3 had mutated CXCR4. Notably, we found MYD88L265P in B cell precursors from 1/10 cases and in residual normal B cells from 4/10 patients, which were confirmed by ASO-PCR and ddPCR. Indeed, these more sensitive methods detected MYD88L265P in B cell precursors from 6/10 cases and in residual normal B cells from 6/10 patients. CXCR4 was simultaneously mutated in B cell precursors and WM B cells from one patient. Overall, CD34+ HPC, B-cell precursors and residual normal B cells shared a median of 2 (range, 0-45; mean VAF, 0.13), 3 (range, 1-44; mean VAF, 0.168), and 6 (range, 1-56; mean VAF, 0.29) somatic mutations with WM B cells; some being found all the way from CD34+ HPC to WM B cells and PCs. Interestingly, concordance between the mutational landscape of WM B cells and PCs was A median of 18 mutations (range, 3-26; median CCF and range, 0.72 [0.07 - 1]) were unique to WM cells. Importantly, clonal mutations in WM B cells were undetectable in normal cells. Thus, the few WM subclonal mutations observed in patients' lymphopoiesis could not result from contamination during FACSorting since in such cases, WM clonal mutations would become detectable in normal cells. Furthermore, copy number alterations (CNA) present in WM cells were undetectable in normal cells. scRNA/BCRseq unveiled that clonotypic cells were confined mostly within mature B cell and PC clusters in IgM MGUS, whereas a fraction of clonotypic cells from WM patients showed a transcriptional profile overlapping with that of B cell precursors. scRNA/BCRseq also uncovered transcriptional differences between clonal B cells from IgM MGUS vs WM patients (eg, proliferation, metabolism). In mice, induced expression of mutated MYD88 led to a moderate increase in the number of B220+CD138+ plasmablasts and B220-CD138+ PCs in lymphoid tissues and BM, but no signs of clonality or hematological disease. Interestingly, such increment was more evident in mice with activation of mutated MYD88 in CD34+ HPC and B-cell precursors vs mice with MYD88 L252P induced in germinal center B cells. Conclusions: We show for the first time that WM patients have somatic mutations, including MYD88L265P and CXCR4 at the B cell progenitor level. Taken together, this study suggests that in some patients, WM could develop from B cell clones carrying MYD88L265P rather than being the initiating event, and that other mutations or CNA are required for the expansion of B cells and PCs with the WM phenotype. Disclosures Motta: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Rossi:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garcia-Sanz:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Self: Patents & Royalties: BIOMED-2 PRIMERS FOR CLONALITY ASSESSMENT; IVS technologies: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Research Funding. Roccaro:Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Amgen: Other; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Other; Janssen: Other; Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC): Research Funding. San-Miguel:Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline and Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paiva:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy.