Search

Background Double induction using two subsequent 7+3 regimens of cytarabine plus anthracycline is commonly performed in AML patients with an adequate performance status in order to maximize dose intensity upfront. However, for patients with a good early response at day 15 of first induction, there is no prospective randomized evidence on the necessity or value of a second induction cycle. Aims In order to answer the question if good responders of the first 7+3 induction could be spared a second induction cycle, we set up randomized-controlled SAL DaunoDouble trial. The study prospectively assesses the outcome of patients with a good early response with respect to the number of induction cycles (single versus double). We assumed non-inferiority of single induction in terms of complete remission (CR/CRi) rate, based on a margin of 7.5%. Here, we present the results of the planned interim analysis. Methods Patients (pts) 18-65 years with newly diagnosed AML, normal cardiac and organ function received a first induction cycle with seven days of cytarabine plus three days of daunorubicin ("7+3"). Response assessment in bone marrow was done on day 15 after the initiation of chemotherapy and confirmed by central review. A blast count Results Between 2014 and 2020, 624 evaluable pts were enrolled and received the first induction cycle with 7+3. A marrow blast clearance below 5% on day 15 was achieved in 298 pts (48%), providing eligibility for randomization. Of these patients, 150 were randomized into arm S and 148 into arm D, respectively. Median age was 52 years, 92% had de novo AML, NPM1 mutation was present in 53%, FLT3-ITD in 25% of pts. Favorable, intermediate and adverse risk (ELN 2017) were present in 56%, 34% and 10% of pts, respectively. CR/CRi rates at the end of induction were 86% after single induction and 85% after double induction. The CR/CRi rates in 224 pre-defined per-protocol pts were 88% versus 91%, resulting in a CR difference of 3% (95%-CI -0.047-0.111; p for non-inferiority test 0.145). After a median follow-up time of 24 months, RFS was slightly but not significantly lower after single induction with a 3-year RFS of 53% versus 64% (HR 1.4, p=0.125), whereas no differences were seen in 3-year OS, with a of rate of 74% versus 75% (HR 1.1, p=0.645) after single versus double induction. Conclusion The interim analysis results show that in good responders, the difference between CR rates after single versus double induction was even smaller than the predefined 7.5% margin, suggesting a trend for non-inferiority of single induction, although statistical significance was not reached. The trial continued recruitment. These findings suggest that in good responders, it may be safe to omit a second induction cycle if a second cycle poses a high risk. Figure. CR + CRi, RFS and OS after randomization to single versus double induction. Disclosures Alakel: Pfizer: Consultancy. Jost:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JAZZ: Other: travel support; Celgene: Other: travel support. Novak:Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Travel expenses; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Krause:Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel Support; MSD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Siemens: Research Funding; Gilead: Other: Travel Support. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Acrotech: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Platzbecker:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Other: Co-owner and CEO. Müller-Tidow:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BiolineRx: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag GmbH: Speakers Bureau.

Background: The incorporation of patient-reported outcomes with traditional disease risk classification, was found to strengthen survival prediction in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A recently reported model, FA-IPSS(h), found that patients' reported fatigue, assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), among higher-risk IPSS population, further stratifies them into distinct sub-groups with different survival outcomes (Efficace et al, 2018). Compared to the IPSS, the revised IPSS (IPSS-R) is more refined in prognostic assessment and an IPSS-R score of > 3.5 may identify higher risk disease (Pfeilstocker et al, 2016). The Edmonton Symptom Self Assessment Scale (ESAS) Global Fatigue Scale (GFS), is a single-item fatigue rating scale (0-10, with 10 being the highest degree), which has been previously recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network to screen for fatigue in all cancer populations. Aims: (1) to validate the FA-IPSS(h), among the Canadian MDS registry (2) investigate whether a modified index, integrating higher risk by IPSS-R with patient reported fatigue according to the GFS, is able to identify individual subgroups with divergent overall survival (OS). Methods: All adult patients diagnosed with MDS with an IPSS-R score >3.5 within 6 months before the date of registration were eligible for this analysis. Fatigue was assessed both by the QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the GFS. Frailty was assessed by the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) 9 point Rockwood clinical frailty scale. Survival was calculated using standard Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: This analysis included 331 patients. Median age was 73 years (range, 30-98 years), 65.7% were male, median blast % was 6% (range, 0-30), median IPSS-R score was 5.2 (range, 3.5-10) and 55% had high and intermediate-2 (Int-2) IPSS risk, 68% had high and very high IPSS-R risk disease, 66% were exposed to a hypomethylating agent. Median fatigue scores increased with Rockwood frailty scores. The median QLQ-C30 fatigue score was 33 (interquartile range (IQR), 22-55.6) and 4 (IQR, 2-6) by the GFS with 59% recording high fatigue (>4). At a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR, 9-30 months), 233 deaths were observed. The actuarial median OS was 19.3 months (95% CI, 16.5-21.7). We applied the FA-IPSS(h) using QLQ-C30 fatigue cutoffs of 45 (figure 1a) and found a significant difference in OS (p3.5 + Low Fatigue (3.5 + High Fatigue (≥45) (n=96). We found a significant difference in OS between these 2 groups, median OS 19.5 months (95% CI, 17.2-24.3) in group A versus 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.9-22.0) in group B (p=0.02) (figure 1b). We found similar results with these refinements, using the QLQ-C30 cutoff of 33 (the median in our patient population) (p4), was able to distinguish OS using the IPSS (p3.5 (p=0.005) (figure 1d). Conclusions: We were able to externally validate the FA-IPSS (h) using a threshold QLQ-C30 fatigue score of 45, as originally described and 33 (Canadian median), using both the IPSS and IPSS-R (score >3.5) classifications to define higher risk MDS. The easier to deploy ESAS GFS score of >4 further discriminates survival using the IPSS and IPSS-R. This emphasizes the power of self-reported fatigue at refining OS predictions in higher risk MDS and further bolsters the importance of considering patient related outcomes in global assessments. Disclosures Geddes: Taiho: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Keating:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leber:Lundbeck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Palladin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Treadwell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Leitch:AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Exjade: Speakers Bureau. Shamy:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Storring:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nevill:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Delage:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Elemary:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Chodirker:Hoffman Laroche: Honoraria. Buckstein:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Astex: Honoraria.

Intro: Iron overload (IO) reflected by elevated serum ferritins is associated with increased mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with a threshold effect seen above 1000 ug/ml (Malcovati, JCO 2005). Ferritin is elevated due to transfusions, inflammation and ineffective erythropoiesis but is an imperfect metric of true iron overload. Elevated levels of oxidatively damaging non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) and labile plasma iron (LBI) are not easily measured but correlate with transferrin saturation (TSAT) >70% and >80% respectively (de Swart, Haematological 2018). The relationship of TSAT with ferritin and MDS-related clinical outcomes has not been well-characterized. Objectives: We aimed to describe temporal trends in TSAT according to transfusion dependence and to determine if elevated TSAT correlates with ferritin levels, and/or predicts for clinical outcomes such as survival, infectious death and cardiac death in patients with MDS. Methods: Adult patients enrolled in the Canadian national MDS registry over 11.5 years and 15 centers were evaluated retrospectively. Mean, median and ranges for ferritin and TSAT were calculated at six (+/- 3) month intervals. General linear mixed model analysis with repeated measures per subject was used to evaluate changes in ferritin and TSAT over time. Transfusion density (TD) was calculated at landmark year 1 and 2 and was defined as the total number of units transfused/months elapsed since commencing transfusion dependence, with TD-low and TD-high defined as above or below median. Log-rank tests were used to detect survival differences among three transfusion groups (transfusion independent [TI], TD-low and TD-high), among three TSAT groups (TSAT 80% at enrolment), and among three ferritin groups (≤500ug/mL, 501-1000ug/mL and >1000ug/mL at enrolment). Results: A total of 718 patients from the MDS-CAN registry were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics including demographics, clinical and laboratory characteristics are summarized in Table 1. With a median follow up of 2.1 years, actuarial OS was 2.4 years. 17% developed AML and 61% of patients have died. AML, progressive disease, infection, cardiac causes, bleeding accounted for 26%, 20%, 19%, 9.6% and 6.34% of known causes of death respectively. 56% experienced infections (median 2/patient), 7% experienced a cardiac event and 43% were hospitalized at least once. Ferritin and TSAT were moderately correlated over time (r=0.63, p < 0.0001) (Figure 1A) with only 39% of all ferritins >1000ug/mL associating with a TSAT of >80%. The relationship between the 2337 serum ferritins (recorded over 42 months) and TSAT is shown in Figure 1B. Among all patients, ferritin significantly increased from enrolment up to 42 months (p Conclusion: Among a cohort of predominantly low-intermediate risk MDS patients, TSAT correlated only moderately with serum ferritins. TD patients, and in particular high transfusion-burden TD patients have inferior clinical outcomes compared to TI or low-transfusion burden TD patients. Further analyses to probe these relationships are ongoing including the effect of TSAT and iron chelation therapy on infectious deaths, and a multivariate analysis adjusting for other covariates. Disclosures Geddes: Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Keating:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Taiho: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leber:Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Treadwell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Palladin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shamy:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Storring:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nevill:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Delage:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Elemary:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Chodirker:Hoffman Laroche: Honoraria. Leitch:AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Exjade: Speakers Bureau. Buckstein:Astex: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.

Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence (TD) and anemia are associated with inferior quality of life (QOL) and survival in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). As part of a research programme to identify the optimal transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) threshold that translates into significantly improved QOL, we conducted a pilot randomized study of two transfusion algorithms (liberal versus restrictive) to determine the feasibility of a larger study. This trial was aligned with the REDDS study (ISRCTN26088319, Stanworth et al., BJH 2019) and followed the same pre-defined statistical analysis plan. Methods The study was undertaken at 3 cancer centers (NCT02099669). We included patients with MDS, CMML, low blast AML (20-30%) or myeloproliferative neoplasms who were TD (> 1 RBC/8 weeks x 16 weeks). Patients on disease modifying therapy for > 6 months were permitted only if they had remained stably RBC-TD with a life expectancy of > 3 months. Central randomization was to one of two RBC transfusion strategies over a 12-week period: Restrictive strategy to maintain Hb between 85 and 105g/L. To achieve this, 2 RBC units were transfused when Hb < 85 g/LLiberal strategy to maintain Hb between 110 and 120 g/L. To achieve this, 2 RBC units were transfused when Hb < 105 g/L and 1 unit for Hb 105-110 g/L. The first 4 weeks were considered a run-in period to achieve the target Hb. The primary outcomes of this feasibility study were The percentage compliance of Hb being within or above the target range of the assigned transfusion threshold (after the 4 week run-in). Feasibility was set at 70%.Achievement of at least a 15 g/L difference between the mean pre-transfusion Hb of the liberal and restrictive strategy groups. Secondary outcomes included changes and differences in QOL scores, rates of transfusion reactions and alloimmunizations, overall blood utilization and visit numbers and impact on serum ferritin. The primary analysis was intention to treat. The study was closed early due to COVID-19, with 28 patients randomized of planned 30. Results 30 patients were enrolled over 5 years and 28 patients randomized (n=15, liberal; n=13 restrictive). Median age was 74 (range 58-84), 26/28 had MDS or CMML and there were no significant imbalances in baseline disease and patient characteristics although patients in the restrictive group tended to have lower risk disease (IPSS-R very low + low 69% versus 53% liberal). Compared with the restrictive arm, liberal arm patients had more complete blood counts, were transfused more RBC units (only during the 4-week run-in) and were transfused at shorter intervals (Table 1). There were no differences in adverse events. Over the 12 weeks, the mean Hb value was 90 ± 4 g/L (restrictive) versus 101 ± 4 g/L (liberal), (p Adherence with QOL completion (minimum of 4 serial) was 93%. While sample sizes are small and comparisons exploratory, the area under the curve for several serial quality of life scores was numerically higher and the curve more stable for the liberal arm (EQ5D (figure 2), EORTC cognitive and emotional functioning). Similarly, a higher % of patients in the liberal arm achieved pre-defined clinically meaningful increases in several symptom and function domains (emotional, social, fatigue, dyspnea, financial problems). Discussion Whilst our study results did not meet our feasibility endpoints, this small randomized trial in MDS patients demonstrated clinically important differences in mean Hb achievable with different transfusion thresholds. Poor rates of compliance with Hb targets were clearly identified for patients in the liberal arm, suggesting a need to understand the barriers to protocol adherence in this arm prior to embarking on larger trials. Compared with the REDDS trial, we did not document a significant excess of RBC transfusions needed (post run-in period) to maintain the higher Hb threshold. Similar to REDDS, we did observe some signals of improved QOL with a liberal transfusion strategy. A formal analysis of pooled results with REDDS study patients is planned. (Funding, CCSRI grant QOLL-14 and MOSPI Fund 2014). Disclosures Buckstein: Novartis: Honoraria; Astex: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Prica:seattle genetics: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; astra zeneca: Honoraria. Leber:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Palladin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Treadwell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chodirker:Hoffman Laroche: Honoraria. Lin:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Callum:Octapharma: Research Funding; Canadian Blood Services: Research Funding.

Background: The addition of sorafenib to standard induction and consolidation therapy in newly diagnosed patients (pts) ≤60 years (yrs) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) led to significant prolongation of event-free survival (EFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in the randomized placebo-controlled SORAML trial (NCT00893373). After a median follow-up of 3 yrs, a benefit for sorafenib treated pts was observed also in overall survival (OS), but this difference was not significant. Here, we present updated survival data and information on relapse treatment and outcome. Methods: In the SORAML trial, 267 newly diagnosed untreated fit AML pts up to 60 yrs of age and irrespective of FLT3 mutation status received two cycles of induction chemotherapy with DA (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 days 3-5 plus cytarabine 100 mg/m2 cont. inf. days 1-7), followed by three cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation (3 g/m2 b.i.d. days 1, 3, 5). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was scheduled for all intermediate-risk pts in first complete remission (CR) with a sibling donor and for all high-risk pts with a matched related or unrelated donor. At study inclusion, pts were randomized to receive either sorafenib (2x400 mg/day) or placebo as add-on to standard treatment in a double blinded fashion. Study medication was given on days 10-19 of DA I+II, from day 8 of each consolidation until 3 days before the start of the next consolidation and as maintenance for 12 months (mos) after the end of consolidation. The primary endpoint of the trial was EFS. The results after follow-up of 3 yrs were presented at ASH 2014 (Röllig et al., Blood 2014; 124: 6) and fully published (Röllig et al., Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1691-9). Here, we present the results after prolonged follow-up. For this analysis, information on remission and survival status, mode and outcome of relapse treatment including SCT were collected for all randomized pts and analyzed by standard statistical methods. Results: Of 267 treated pts, 134 were randomized in the sorafenib arm and 133 in the placebo arm with a resulting CR rate of 60% and 59%, respectively. After a median observation time of 78 mos, the primary study endpoint EFS in the placebo vs sorafenib arm was 9 mos vs 26 mos (HR 0.68, p=0.01) in univariate Kaplan Meier analysis. The beneficial effect of sorafenib on EFS was confirmed in multivariate Cox regression analysis with a HR of 0.61 (p=0.005). Median RFS in the placebo vs sorafenib arms was 22 vs 63 mos, corresponding to a HR of 0.64 (p=0.033). Exploratory analyses were performed in the 70 relapsing pts (40 after placebo vs 30 after sorafenib treatment). Among relapsing pts, 82% vs 73% achieved a second CR. In these two groups, 88% and 87% of pts received a SCT as part of salvage treatment. A lower proportion of pts in the placebo arm received a second SCT as salvage treatment (5% vs 13%). In the context of salvage SCT, the proportion of haploident donors in the placebo and sorafenib group was 3% vs 15% and the incidence of Grade 3/4 GVDH was 17% vs 0%. SCT-related non-relapse mortality (NRM) was similar in both groups, but the cumulative incidence of second relapse (CIR) was higher in the sorafenib group (35% vs 54% after 48 mos). Therefore, median OS from relapse in the placebo vs sorafenib groups were 27 mos vs 10 mos, corresponding to a HR of 1.68 (p=0.098). The projected median OS from randomization is 83 mos in the placebo arm and was not reached for the sorafenib arm, corresponding to a 5-year OS of 52% vs 61% (HR 0.81, p=0.263). Conclusion: Mature follow-up data confirms the antileukemic efficacy of sorafenib in younger AML pts with and without FLT3 mutation. The addition of sorafenib to standard chemotherapy resulted in a significantly longer EFS and clinically relevant 36% risk reduction for relapse or death. Five pts need to be treated (NNT) to prevent one relapse or death at 3 years and six pts at 5 yrs. Exploratory analyses in relapsing pts show that survival after relapse is shorter after sorafenib which might be due to i) a higher rate of second SCTs and a higher incidence of haploidentical SCT despite the lower frequency of severe GVHD, most likely by chance and not explainable by systematic reasons and ii) a lower response to salvage treatment after sorafenib therapy. Despite these observations, primary sorafenib treatment led to an OS benefit with a 19% risk reduction for death which was not statistically significant since this phase II trial was not adequately powered to detect OS differences. Figure Figure. Disclosures Rollig: Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Hüttmann: Gilead, Amgen: Other: Travel cost; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Celgene, Roche: Honoraria. Giagounidis: Acceleron: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Mackensen: AMGEN: Research Funding. Hänel: Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Thiede: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agendix: Employment. Schetelig: Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

CCR5 is the major coreceptor for macrophage-tropic strains of the human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1). Homozygotes for a 32-base pair (bp) deletion in the coding sequence of the receptor (CCR5Δ32) were found to be highly resistant to viral infection, and CCR5 became, therefore, one of the paradigms illustrating the influence of genetic variability onto individual susceptibility to infectious and other diseases. We investigated the functional consequences of 16 other natural CCR5 mutations described in various human populations. We found that 10 of these variants are efficiently expressed at the cell surface, bind [125I]-MIP-1β with affinities similar to wtCCR5, respond functionally to chemokines, and act as HIV-1 coreceptors. In addition to Δ32, six mutations were characterized by major alterations in their functional response to chemokines, as a consequence of intracellular trapping and poor expression at the cell surface (C101X, FS299), general or specific alteration of ligand binding affinities (C20S, C178R, A29S), or relative inability to mediate receptor activation (L55Q). A29S displayed an unusual pharmacological profile, binding and responding to MCP-2 similarly to wtCCR5, but exhibiting severely impaired binding and functional responses to MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and RANTES. In addition to Δ32, only C101X was totally unable to mediate entry of HIV-1. The fact that nonfunctional CCR5 alleles are relatively frequent in various human populations reinforces the hypothesis of a selective pressure favoring these alleles.

CCR5 was first characterized as a receptor for MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES, and was rapidly shown to be the main coreceptor for M-tropic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 strains and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Chemokines constitute a rapidly growing family of proteins and receptor-chemokine interactions are known to be promiscuous and redundant. We have therefore tested whether other CC-chemokines could bind to and activate CCR5. All CC-chemokines currently available were tested for their ability to compete with [(125)I]-MIP-1beta binding on a stable cell line expressing recombinant CCR5, and/or to induce a functional response in these cells. We found that in addition to MIP-1beta, MIP-1alpha, and RANTES, five other CC-chemokines could compete for [(125)I]-MIP-1beta binding: MCP-2, MCP-3, MCP-4, MCP-1, and eotaxin binding was characterized by IC(50) values of 0.22, 2.14, 5.89, 29.9, and 21.7 nmol/L, respectively. Among these ligands, MCP-3 had the remarkable property of binding CCR5 with high affinity without eliciting a functional response, MCP-3 could also inhibit the activation of CCR5 by MIP-1beta and may therefore be considered as a natural antagonist for CCR5. It was unable to induce significant endocytosis of the receptor. Chemokines that could compete with high affinity for MIP-1beta binding could also compete for monomeric gp120 binding, although with variable potencies; maximal gp120 binding inhibition was 80% for MCP-2, but only 30% for MIP-1beta. MCP-3 could compete efficiently for gp120 binding but was, however, found to be a weak inhibitor of HIV infection, probably as a consequence of its inability to downregulate the receptor.

[Figure][1] In March 2012, a 31-year-old male patient was diagnosed with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) manifesting within the left sinus maxillaris with local lymphonodular metastases. No further metastases could be found by positron emission tomography–magnetic resonance imaging. He

In patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is considered to be the only treatment providing long-term disease control for fit patients. The BRIDGE trial studied the safety and efficacy of a clofarabine-based salvage therapy prior to HSCT in patients with r/r AML. Here, we report the long-term follow up of this Phase II, multi-center, Intent-To-Transplant study and the impact of comorbidity on outcome. Eighty-four patients with a median age of 61 years (range 40 - 75) were enrolled. Patients were scheduled for at least one cycle of salvage therapy with CLARA (clofarabine 30 mg/m2 and cytarabine 1 g/m2, days 1-5). Chemo-responsive patients with a donor received HSCT after first CLARA. In the event of a prolonged donor search, HSCT was performed as soon as possible. The conditioning regimen consisted of clofarabine 30 mg/m2, day -6 to -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -2. The ECOG score, hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and Cumulative Illness Rating scale (CIRS) were obtained at study enrolment as well as prior to HSCT. Sixty-seven percent of the patients received HSCT within the trial. After a median follow up of 40months (95% CI, 38-49 months), the estimated 4-year OS (Figure 1) for all enrolled patients was 38% (95% CI, 28-50%) and Disease-Free Survival for transplanted patients was48% (95% CI, 36-64%). The CIR at four years was 30% (95% CI, 17-43%) and the NRM 22% (95% CI, 10-33%).Those patients who received an allogeneic HSCT within the trial had a median HCT-CI at the time of study enrollment of 1 (range, 0 - 6) compared to a median of 2 (range, 0 - 6) for those who did not proceed to allogeneic HSCT (p = .17). Corresponding figures for the CIRS were a median of 2 (range, 0 - 9) compared to 4 (range, 0 - 8) (p = .09). The median ECOG score was 1 (range, 0 - 3) in both groups. Compared to the time point of study enrollment, both the HCT-CI as well as the CIRS increased to a median of 2 (observed range of score, 0 - 7) and a median of 4 (observed range of score, 0 - 12), respectively, at the time of start of the conditioning regimen. This was almost exclusively due to an increase in infectious complications (Figure 2). Inmultivariate analysis, both the baseline HCT-CI and the ECOG score had a statistically significant impact with a HR of 1.22 (p = .025) and 1.72 (p = .001), respectively, on OS. Using a clofarabine-based salvage therapy combined with early allogeneic HSCT we were able to achieve good long-term results for patients with r/r AML. In this cohort, both the HCT-CI and the ECOG score gave prognostic information on OS, showing feasibility of comorbidity evaluation at the time of diagnose of r/r AML. Figure 1 OS of all enrolled patients Figure 1. OS of all enrolled patients Figure 2 Changes of the HCT-CI at baseline to HSCT Figure 2. Changes of the HCT-CI at baseline to HSCT Disclosures Middeke: Sanofi: Honoraria. Rösler:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses. Thiede:AgenDix: Employment, Other: Ownership. Schetelig:Sanofi: Honoraria.

Genomic alterations play a crucial role in the development and progression of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). We determined gene copy number alterations (GCNAs) of TP53, CDKN2A, CDKN1B, BCL2, MYC, REL, and RB1 with a single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (quantitative multiplex PCR of short fragments [QMPSF]) in a cohort of 114 patients with DLBCL to assess their prognostic value and relationship with the gene expression profile. Losses of TP53 and CDKN2A, observed in 8% and 35% of patients, respectively, were significantly associated with a shorter survival after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) treatment, independently of the International Prognostic Index and of the cell of origin. Analysis of the 9p21 genomic region indicated that transcripts encoding p14ARF and p16INK4A were both disrupted in most patients with CDKN2A deletion. These patients predominantly had an activated B-cell profile and showed a specific gene expression signature, characterized by dysregulation of the RB/E2F pathway, activation of cellular metabolism, and decreased immune and inflammatory responses. These features may constitute the molecular basis sustaining the unfavorable outcome and chemoresistance of this DLBCL subgroup. Detection of TP53 and CDKN2A loss by QMPSF is a powerful tool that could be used for patient stratification in future clinical trials.

Very late activation antigens (VLAs) are glycoproteins (GPs) that play a major role in platelet adhesion to extracellular matrix. These GPs, members of the integrin family, are heterodimer complexes with different alpha subunits noncovalently associated with a common beta 1 subunit known as GPIIa. GPIa-IIa (also known as VLA2), GPIc-IIa (VLA5), and GPIc*-IIa (VLA6) are involved, respectively, in platelet adhesion to collagen, fibronectin, and laminin. At this stage, very little is known about the role of GPIIa in platelet adhesive functions. In this study, we have generated a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) (LYP22) directed against GPIIa. Immunoaffinity chromatography using LYP22 combined with two-dimensional nonreduced-reduced sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis shows that the antibody brings down all VLA subunits. Western blots indicate that the binding site of LYP22 on GPIIa is disulfide bridge-dependent. The number of LYP22 binding sites is not increased on stimulation with thrombin and is in the range of what is observed with another anti-GPIIa MoAb (A-1A5). LYP22 is the first anti-GPIIa MoAb to inhibit aggregation and secretion of washed platelets stimulated with collagen, thrombin, or arachidonic acid. Moreover, the lag-phase usually observed on collagen stimulation is significantly prolonged (by 60 seconds) in the presence of LYP22. This lag-phase, mediated by LYP22, is also observed in the presence of plasma proteins and is coupled with a reduced effect on collagen- induced platelet aggregation. In addition, LYP22 affects the adhesion of resting platelets to type III collagen, but not to fibronectin, laminin, or type I collagen. These results strongly indicate that the site on GPIIa, bearing the LYP22 epitope, is an active participant in signal transduction controlling platelet functions.

Translocations and somatic mutations are common genetic alterations of the BCL-6 gene on chromosome 3q27 in B-cell lymphoma, with implications for lymphomagenesis. The 2 events may have linked origins and can influence juxtaposed loci. To evaluate this further, we compared mutations occurring within the major mutation cluster region of the translocated and untranslocated BCL-6 alleles in 7 t(3;14)(q27;14q32) lymphomas. In 6 of 7 cases, the translocated allele revealed significantly higher mutations (mean, 5.8 × 10–2 bp–1) than did the untranslocated allele (mean, 5.3 × 10–3 bp–1; P < .01). The increase mapped to der(14q32), which retains the BCL-6 promoter and is transcriptionally active, as revealed by fusion transcripts and ongoing somatic mutations, absent in the der(3q27) region. These results indicate that enhanced mutational activity at the translocated allele may be a consequence of loss of cis regulatory elements or gain of IgH enhancer elements. Junctional sequences indicate translocation origins from earlier BCL-6 mutations and switch recombinase events.

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may present with either concomitant or isolated extramedullary (EM) AML. Data on the prevalence of EM AML are based on retrospective and clinical analyses which rely on findings from physical examination only or on coincidental findings in standard imaging procedures and range from 2.5 to 9.1% (Bakst et al., Blood 2011;118(14):3785-3793). Previous studies identified EM AML as a prognostic factor in patients with AML. 18Fluorodesoxy-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography – Computed Tomography (18FDG/PET-CT) is able to detect highly metabolic tissue and has proven efficacy in imaging studies for various types of malignant diseases. In a pilot study in patients with histologically proven EM AML, we were able to demonstrate a sensitivity of 90% using 18FDG/PET-CT imaging and found additional EM sites in 60% of the patients (Stölzel et al., Haematologica 2011;96(10):1552-1556). The aim of this prospective, observational study was to determine the prevalence of EM AML in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed AML using 18FDG/PET-CT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01278069). Patients and Methods: A total of 94 patients with AML (newly diagnosed AML, n = 85 and relapsed AML, n = 9) underwent total body 18FDG/PET-CT scans at diagnosis after giving informed consent. Patients with EM diagnosed by 18FDG/PET-CT underwent a second 18FDG/PET-CT scan after induction chemotherapy. The median age of all patients was 61 years (range, 27 to 79 years). Patients were included only if a delay of ≤ 5 days of initiation of induction- or re-induction chemotherapy was clinically justifiable to perform the study. 18FDG/PET-CT scans were performed using a Siemens Sensation 16 as part of a biograph (Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA) with i.v. application of 18FDG (range of activity 223 to 433 MBq) and 120 ml i.v. contrast media Ultravist 370 (Bayer Schering Pharma, Leverkusen, Germany). Adverse reactions due to the application of i.v. 18FDG and i.v. contrast media did not occur. Results: Total body 18FDG/PET-CT imaging detected highly metabolic manifestations suggestive for EM AML in 21 patients (22%). During follow-up after induction chemotherapy, 18FDG-avid EM was still observed in 50% of all PET-positive patients. In comparison with PET-negative patients, those with PET-positive EM AML had a higher bone marrow blast count, a higher prevalence of FAB M5 morphology, higher peripheral WBC, higher serum LDH, and less frequent FLT3-ITD mutations. Sites of EM AML were connective tissue (n=4), parenchymal tissues (n=8), and lymph nodes (n=15). In patients with clinically overt EM AML (n=8) additional EM manifestations were detected in 62% (n=5). In 13 patients, samples from EM sites were obtained for histology review – in 10 patients histology confirmed the occurrence of EM AML in these sites, indicating a specificity of 77%. Importantly, in the remaining patients in whom histology could not confirm EM AML, concomitant malignant tumors were found. Extrapolating these results on the entire cohort, the prevalence of EM AML in newly diagnosed and relapsed AML is 17%. Conclusions: Our study is the first to prospectively evaluate 18FDG/PET-CT imaging for the diagnosis of EM AML. According to our results, 18FDG/PET-CT is a useful and safe tool in order to detect EM AML with a high specificity. We found a prevalence of EM AML of 17%. This is two- to eightfold higher, than in previously reported clinical studies. Integration of 18FDG/PET-CT-based imaging procedures as adjunct for response assessment in these patients seems to be important. Further development of other PET-based imaging procedures and integration in the setting of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation might be necessary and will contribute to a better understanding of the biology and prognostic role of EM AML and the development of targeted treatment strategies in patients with AML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor with activity against several oncogenic kinases that may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In-vitro data and results from non-randomized clinical trials suggest that sorafenib might be an effective drug for the treatment of AML. We present the results of the randomized placebo-controlled SORAML trial testing sorafenib versus placebo as add-on to standard induction and consolidation treatment in AML patients ≤60 years. Patients and Methods: Between March 2009 and October 2011, 276 patients from 25 centers were enrolled in the SORAML trial (NCT00893373). The main eligibility criteria were newly diagnosed AML, age from 18 to 60 years and suitability for intensive therapy. The treatment plan for all patients included two cycles of induction with DA (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 days 3-5 plus cytarabine 100 mg/m2 cont. inf. days 1-7), followed by three cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation (3 g/m2 b.i.d. days 1, 3, 5). Patients without response after DA I received second induction with HAM (cytarabine 3 g/m2 b.i.d. days 1-3 plus mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 days 3-5). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was scheduled for all intermediate-risk patients in first complete remission with a sibling donor and for all high-risk patients with a matched related or unrelated donor. At study inclusion, patients were randomized to receive either sorafenib (800 mg/day) or placebo as add-on to standard treatment in a double blinded fashion. Block randomization at a ratio of 1:1 was performed within cytogenetic and molecular risk strata, allocation was concealed and treatment was double blinded. Study medication was given on days 10-19 of DA I+II or HAM, from day 8 of each consolidation until 3 days before the start of the next consolidation and as maintenance for 12 months after the end of consolidation. The primary endpoint of the trial was event-free survival (EFS) with an event being defined as either failure to achieve a complete remission (CR) after induction, relapse or death. Secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), CR rate and incidence of adverse events (AE). We present the results of the final analysis of the primary endpoint EFS (intent to treat) after the occurrence of 134 events. Results: Out of 276 enrolled patients, 267 received study treatment, 134 in the sorafenib arm and 133 in the placebo arm. Demographic and disease characteristics were equally distributed between the two arms; the incidence of FLT3-ITD was 17%. The median cumulative dose of administered study medication was similar in both arms. The CR rates were 59% versus 60% in the placebo versus sorafenib arm (p=0.764). After a median observation time of 36 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months in the placebo arm and 20.5 months in the sorafenib arm, corresponding to a 3-year EFS of 22% versus 40% (p=0.013). Median RFS after standard treatment plus placebo was 23 months and not yet reached after sorafenib treatment, corresponding to a 3-year RFS of 38% and 56%, respectively (p=0.017). The median OS had not been reached in either arm; the 3-year OS was 56% with placebo versus 63% with sorafenib (p=0.382). In 46 FLT3-ITD positive patients, no difference in EFS, but a trend for prolonged RFS and OS in favor of sorafenib was observed. The most common reported AEs Grade ≥3 were fever (40%), infections (22%) and bleeding events (2%). The risk for fever, bleeding events and hand-foot syndrome was significantly higher in the sorafenib arm while the incidence of all other AEs showed no significant differences. Conclusions: In younger AML patients, the addition of sorafenib to standard chemotherapy in a sequential manner is feasible and associated with antileukemic efficacy. We observed a higher incidence of infections and bleeding events under sorafenib. Whereas OS in both treatment arms was similar, sorafenib treatment resulted in a significantly prolonged EFS and RFS. Figure 1: Event-free survival Figure 1:. Event-free survival Disclosures Off Label Use: sorafenib for treatment of aml. Serve:Bayer HealthCare: Research Funding. Ehninger:Bayer HealthCare: Research Funding.

Background: In relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), long-term disease-free survival may only be achieved with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Within the BRIDGE Trial, the safety and efficacy of a clofarabine salvage therapy as a bridge to HSCT was studied. Here, we report long-term survival data and the impact of donor availability at the time of study enrollment. The BRIDGE trial (NCT 01295307) was a phase II, multicenter, intent-to-transplant study. Patients and Methods: Between March 2011 and May 2013, 84 patients with relapsed or refractory AML older than 40 years were enrolled. Patients were scheduled for at least one cycle of induction therapy with CLARA (clofarabine 30 mg/m2 and cytarabine 1 g/m2, days 1-5). Patients with a donor received HSCT in aplasia after first CLARA. In case of a prolonged donor search, HSCT was performed as soon as possible. The conditioning regimen consisted of clofarabine 30 mg/m2, day -6 to -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 on day -2. In patients with partially matched unrelated donors, ATG (Genzyme) at a cumulative dose of 4.5 mg/kg was recommended. GvHD prophylaxis consisted of CsA and mycophenolate mofetil. Results: Forty-four patients suffered from relapsed AML and 40 patients had refractory disease. The median patient age was 61 years (range 40 – 75). According to the current ELN risk stratification 17% of pts were classified as favorable risk, 35% as intermediate I, 17% as intermediate II and 20% as adverse risk. The overall response rate assessed at day 15 after start of CLARA was 80% (defined as at least a marked reduction in BM blasts or BM cellularity and absence of blasts in the peripheral blood) with 31% of patients having less than 5% BM blasts at that time. Seventeen patients did not respond to CLARA, and were subsequently treated off-study. Due to early death, three patients were not evaluable for treatment response. Overall, 66% of the patients received HSCT within the trial. Donors were HLA-identical siblings in eight cases (14%), HLA-compatible unrelated donors in 30 cases (55%) and unrelated donors with one mismatch in 17 cases (31%). Treatment success was defined as complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete recovery (CRi) or CRchim (BM donor chimerism >95% and absolute neutrophil count >0.5/nL) on day 35 after HSCT. Treatment success was achieved in 61% of the patients. With a median follow up of 25 months, the OS for all enrolled patients at two years was 42% (95% CI, 32% to 54%). (Figure 1) The Leukemia-free survival at two years for those 51 patients who achieved the primary endpoint was 52% (95% CI, 40% to 69%). (Figure 2) At the time of enrollment, 14% of patients had a related donor and 33% had an unrelated donor available. In 46% of the patients, donor search was initiated at the time of enrollment. For 7% of patients, donor search was unsuccessful prior to enrollment and reinitiated. The OS at 2 years for patients with a related or an unrelated donor available was 75% (95% CI, 54% to 100%) and 47% (95% CI, 31% to 71%), respectively, while it was 29% (95% CI, 18% to 48%) for patients for whom donor search was initiated at time of enrollment (p = .09). Conclusions: Salvage therapy with CLARA, and subsequent conditioning with clofarabine and melphalan prior to allogeneic HSCT, provides good anti-leukemic activity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. Fast unrelated donor search and work up, with conditioning in aplasia allowed a high rate of successful HSCTs. The leukemia-free survival for this group of elderly, high risk AML patients is very promising. Figure 1 Figure 1. Overall survival for all patients, n=84 Figure 2 Figure 2. Leukemia-free survival for all patients with primary treatment success, n=51 Disclosures Middeke: Genzyme: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Clofarabine for AML. Schetelig:Genzyme: Research Funding; DKMS German Bone Marrow Donor Center: Employment.

The interferon (IFN)–inducible chemokines, specifically, IFN-γ–inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monokine induced by IFN-γ (Mig), and IFN-inducible T-cell α-chemoattractant (I-TAC), share a unique CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR3). Recently, the highly specific membrane-bound protease and lymphocyte surface marker CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) was found to be responsible for posttranslational processing of chemokines. Removal of NH2-terminal dipeptides by CD26/DPP IV alters chemokine receptor binding and signaling, and hence inflammatory and anti–human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activities. CD26/DPP IV and CXCR3 are both markers for Th1 lymphocytes and, moreover, CD26/DPP IV is present in a soluble, active form in human plasma. This study reports that at physiologic enzyme concentrations CD26/DPP IV cleaved 50% of I-TAC within 2 minutes, whereas for IP-10 and Mig the kinetics were 3- and 10-fold slower, respectively. Processing of IP-10 and I-TAC by CD26/DPP IV resulted in reduced CXCR3-binding properties, loss of calcium-signaling capacity through CXCR3, and more than 10-fold reduced chemotactic potency. Moreover, IP-10 and I-TAC cleaved by CD26/DPP IV acted as chemotaxis antagonists and CD26/DPP IV–truncated IP-10 and Mig retained their ability to inhibit the angiogenic activity of interleukin-8 in the rabbit cornea micropocket model. These data demonstrate a negative feedback regulation by CD26/DPP IV in CXCR3-mediated chemotaxis without affecting the angiostatic potential of the CXCR3 ligands IP-10 and Mig.

Introduction CMV-infection is a serious complication in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) where immunosuppressive therapy and impaired T cell reconstitution result in a high risk for viral infections. Monitoring of CMV-virus load by PCR and preemptive therapy are important tools to prevent CMV disease. However, CMV specific cytotoxic T cells (CMV-CTLs) are needed to successfully control CMV-infections. CMV-specific multimers composed of the patients HLA Class I molecule bound to CMV pp65 epitopes give the possibility to monitor CMV-CTLs. Here, we present the case of CMV-reactivation following SCT for AML. Methods The percentage of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells was determined by flow cytometry and mapped to clinical and laboratory parameters of the patient. CD8+ T cells were detected using CD8-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Beckman Coulter) antibody and CD3 as a T-cell marker was labeled with CD3-allophycocyanin (APC, MACS Miltenyi Biotec) antibody. CMV-specific CD8+ T cells were detected using the CMV major histocompatibility complex (MHC) with Strep-Tactinphycoerythrin (PE) conjugate (Streptamers, IBA GmbH). Case A 60 years old male patient was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 95% myeloid blasts in the bone marrow and extramedullary AML manifestations at the time of diagnosis. Following induction therapy the patient was transplanted from a matched unrelated donor. The stem cell recipient as well as his donor had been tested sero-positive for CMV prior to SCT. Within the first month following transplantation, the patient developed an effective CMV specific immunity as seen by high levels of CMV-specific T cells (Figure 1). About three months following transplantation the patient was diagnosed with intestinal GVHD requiring high-dose glucocorticoid treatment. Following steroid exposure, levels of CMV-CTLs dropped and shortly thereafter rising CMV-copy numbers were observed which was accompanied by clinical signs of CMV enteritis. With the administration of antiviral treatment the CMV specific virus load decreased. However, levels of CMV-CTLs remained low, presumably as a result of ongoing steroid exposure. Discussion High levels of CMV-CTLs appeared to control CMV, as seen by a non-detectable virus load in standard PCR testing. The close correlation between the drop in CMV-CTL count and CMV activation highlights the potential of this method to monitor and understand immune responses to CMV following SCT. Of note, early presence of high frequencies of CMV-CTLs did not guarantee CMV-control under steroid exposure as seen in our case. Previous reports have suggested that high dose glucocorticoids may impact CMV-CTLs survival. This is supported by our case, where we see a rapid drop in CMV-CTLs following glucocorticoid exposure. However, the exact molecular mechanisms and more importantly, the predictive value of this finding remain elusive. Furthermore, these data suggest, that patients with ongoing high steroid exposure may not benefit from a transfer of CMV-specific T-cells to control CMV disease. Conclusion Further investigations to clarify the potential of CMV-CTL measurements and to understand the effect of steroid exposure at the functional level are warranted. Studies to correlate CMV-CTL counts with the level of immunosuppression and their influence on controlling CMV-disease will follow. In future, this tool could provide a chance to select patients at high risk of CMV reactivation who could profit from an individualized monitoring and early treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction Patients with MDS harboring a del(5q) often display characteristic morphological features in the bone marrow. For the first time we have recently demonstrated a strong association of the presence of a cytogenetic abnormality - del(5q) - with a specific 5-parameter immunophenotypic profile measured by flow cytometry (FCM). The aim of this prospective study was to test, if this FCM profile could also be applied for monitoring response to treatment with disease-modifying drugs like lenalidomide and azacitidine. Patients and methods Overall, 137 FCM investigations were performed in 52 well-characterized patients with MDS and a del(5q) (IPSS low/int-1: n=30, int-2/high: n=22) including 34 patients with isolated del(5q): 53 measurements before treatment and 84 during treatment (lenalidomide=47 and/or azacitidine=35; chemotherapy and/or allogeneic transplantation=6). Nineteen of 41 thereupon evaluated patients showed a concomitant TP53 mutation. An 8-color/5-tube FCM diagnostic procedure (lyse-stain-wash) was performed on a FACS-Canto II cytometer. Thus, the typical del(5q) FCM profile includes the following 5 parameters: percentage of myeloid progenitors (myPC > 2%) = 3 points, CD45 MFI ratio (lymphocytes : myPC ≤ 7.0) = 10 points, SSC ratio (granulocytes : lymphocytes < 6.0) = 2 points, CD71 (≤ 20%) on granulocytes = 1.5 points, and female gender = 1.5 points. The weighting of these parameters has been done using a logistic regression model. Results In 48/53 (92%, mean score=16.5±2.0) of the FCM measurements before therapy del(5q) was predictable with the 5-parameter FCM score. In the few FCM inconclusive cases the mutational analysis showed a TP53 mutation. Remarkably, in all 18 cases being in cytogenetic complete remission (CCR) in response to therapy the disappearance of del(5q) by conventional cytogenetic analyses was accompanied by the disappearance of the del(5q) FCM profile (specificity=100%; mean score=13.0±1.0). On the other hand, in patients without CCR during treatment the presence of del(5q) could be predicted by the FCM-score (≥ 15) with a sensitivity of 65% (43/66; mean score=15.5±3.0). Of note, in most of those inconclusive measurements (85%) a mutation of the TP53 gene and/or a deletion of chromosome (17p) could be detected suggesting a modification of the immunophenotype mediated by these molecular changes. Interestingly, the complexity of karyotypic abnormalities appeared to play a minor role in modifying the immunophenotype because in two-thirds of the FCM inconclusive cases del(5q) was present as a single abnormality. Conclusion The proposed 5-parameter del(5q) FCM profile can serve as a surrogate for the presence of a del(5q) and could therefore be used as a rapid tool for response monitoring during treatment with disease-modifying drugs. The role of TP53 mutations in modifying the FCM-profile in this context should be the purpose of further investigations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.