Search

Introduction. Primary Mediastinal B Lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare and aggressive neoplasia that typically occurs in young women and is primarily located in the mediastinum. Although the combination of anthracycline and rituximab immunochemotherapy, and PET-guided consolidation radiotherapy, results in a high cure rate, approximately 10-20% of patients show refractoriness or early failure to front-line treatment with a rapid clinical deterioration and a dismal prognosis. These cases, if promptly identified, could benefit from early treatment shift. Therefore, we addressed the development of a clinical score aimed at estimating the risk of early failure of PMBL patients treated with anthracycline-rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy in a real-world nationwide setting.

IntroductionCD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T can induce durable remissions in a fraction of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas (R/R LBCL), but 60% of patients (pts) still relapse. Biological mechanisms explaining lack of responses are emerging but they are largely unsuccessful in predicting disease response at the patient level.

Background: CD19 direct chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an efficacious therapy for patients (pts) affected by relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL). The role of early evaluation by Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is still undefined. The study's objective was to analyze the role of early PET/CT according to histology and CAR T-cell product administered.

Introduction

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with poor prognosis. Although some risk factors associated with worse survival are known, there are no reliable predictive biomarkers of response. Considering the prognostic relevance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in B-cell lymphomas, in this work we aimed to explore its role in 75 patients (pts) enrolled in the PTCL13 prospective study (NCT02223208), including newly diagnosed Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, n=30), nodular T Follicular Helper Lymphoma (nTFHL, n=26) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALK-ALCL, n=19).

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides an option for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies lacking a compatible donor. In this prospective phase 1/2 trial, we evaluated the role of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by early add-backs of CD8-depleted donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs). The RIC regimen consisted of thiotepa, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and 2 Gy total body irradiation. Twenty-eight patients with advanced lymphoproliferative diseases (n = 24) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 4) were enrolled. Ex vivo and in vivo T-cell depletion was carried out by CD34+cell selection and alemtuzumab treatment. The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 26% and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 44%, with a better outcome for patients with chemosensitive disease (OS, 75%). Overall, 54 CD8-depleted DLIs were administered to 23 patients (82%) at 3 different dose levels without loss of engraftment or acute toxicities. Overall, 6 of 23 patients (26%) developed grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease, mainly at dose level 2. In conclusion, our RIC regimen allowed a stable engraftment with a rather low nonrelapse mortality in poor-risk patients; OS is encouraging with some long-term remissions in lymphoid malignancies. CD8-depleted DLIs are feasible and promote the immune reconstitution.

Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides an option for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies lacking a compatible donor. In this prospective phase 1/2 trial, we evaluated the role of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by early add-backs of CD8-depleted donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs). The RIC regimen consisted of thiotepa, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and 2 Gy total body irradiation. Twenty-eight patients with advanced lymphoproliferative diseases (n = 24) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 4) were enrolled. Ex vivo and in vivo T-cell depletion was carried out by CD34+ cell selection and alemtuzumab treatment. The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 26% and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 44%, with a better outcome for patients with chemosensitive disease (OS, 75%). Overall, 54 CD8-depleted DLIs were administered to 23 patients (82%) at 3 different dose levels without loss of engraftment or acute toxicities. Overall, 6 of 23 patients (26%) developed grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease, mainly at dose level 2. In conclusion, our RIC regimen allowed a stable engraftment with a rather low nonrelapse mortality in poor-risk patients; OS is encouraging with some long-term remissions in lymphoid malignancies. CD8-depleted DLIs are feasible and promote the immune reconstitution.

Chiappella: Servier: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Iqone: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead-Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Corradini:Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; BMS: Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; KiowaKirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for.

Tucci: Amgen: Consultancy. Carlo-Stella:Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi: Consultancy; Servier, Novartis, Genenta Science srl, ADC Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Karyopharm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics and Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Corradini:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; BMS: Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; KiowaKirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for. Rossi:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria.

Introduction: We have previously reported short-term efficacy of six courses of R-DA-EPOCH in patients with aggressive B cell lymphomas carrying concomitant MYCand BCL-2and/or BCL-6rearrangement (DHL/THL) or gene increase copy number (ICN) (Tucci et al. Blood S1: 4154, 2017). Further experience with the same program has been described in the meantime in patients with aggressive lymphoma and c-MYCrearrangement, either as single hit or DHL/THL (Dunleavy et al. Lancet Haematol, 2018). We report here long-term results in a larger unselected series of DHL/THL with the aim to confirm our preliminary results and to define the role of consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after R-DA-EPOCH remission induction.

Background:Eighty-five percent of PMBCL are cured by standard therapy, but the outcome of refractory/relapsed (R/R) PMBCL is very poor. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have shown promising activity in relapsed PMBCL. Axibactagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) CAR-T cell therapy, can induce durable responses and is currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with R/R PMBCL.

Background:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an effective treatment in approximately 40% of relapsed/refractory lymphomas. High rates of complete remission (CR) observed in clinical trials, led to fast-track FDA and EMA approval and commercialization of two CD19-directed CAR T-cell products (tisagenlecleucel/Tisa-cel/Kymriah and axicabtagene ciloleucel/Axi-cel/Yescarta) for refractory/relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In these studies, CAR T-cell engraftment and in vivoexpansion have a crucial impact on disease response and toxicity. It is of paramount importance to develop homogeneous standardized approaches for monitoring expansion and persistence of CAR T-cells also in the case of cells not detectable by flow cytometry (FCM) as these data can guide clinical decision making.

A reduced-intensity conditioning regimen was investigated in 45 patients with hematologic malignancies who were considered poor candidates for conventional myeloablative regimens. Median patient age was 49 years. Twenty-six patients previously failed autologous transplantation, and 18 patients had a refractory disease at the time of transplantation. In order to decrease nonrelapse mortality, and enhance the graft-versus-tumor effect, a program was designed in which a reduced conditioning with thiotepa, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide was associated with programmed reinfusions of donor lymphocytes for patients without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), not achieving clinical and molecular remission after transplantation. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Seventeen patients received marrow cells and 28 received mobilized hematopoietic cells. All patients engrafted. The probability of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 47% and 13%, respectively. The probability of nonrelapse mortality, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 13%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. Thirteen patients in complete remission had a polymerase chain reaction marker for minimal disease monitoring; 10 achieved molecular remission after transplantation. Nine patients received donor lymphocytes: one patient with mantle cell lymphoma had a minimal response, one patient with refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation achieved complete remission, and 7 patients did not respond. At a median follow-up of 385 days (range, 24 to 820 days), 25 patients (55%) were alive in complete remission. Although longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome, the study shows that this regimen is associated with a durable engraftment, has a low nonrelapse mortality rate, and can induce clinical and molecular remissions.

A reduced-intensity conditioning regimen was investigated in 45 patients with hematologic malignancies who were considered poor candidates for conventional myeloablative regimens. Median patient age was 49 years. Twenty-six patients previously failed autologous transplantation, and 18 patients had a refractory disease at the time of transplantation. In order to decrease nonrelapse mortality, and enhance the graft-versus-tumor effect, a program was designed in which a reduced conditioning with thiotepa, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide was associated with programmed reinfusions of donor lymphocytes for patients without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), not achieving clinical and molecular remission after transplantation. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A and methotrexate. Seventeen patients received marrow cells and 28 received mobilized hematopoietic cells. All patients engrafted. The probability of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 47% and 13%, respectively. The probability of nonrelapse mortality, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 13%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. Thirteen patients in complete remission had a polymerase chain reaction marker for minimal disease monitoring; 10 achieved molecular remission after transplantation. Nine patients received donor lymphocytes: one patient with mantle cell lymphoma had a minimal response, one patient with refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation achieved complete remission, and 7 patients did not respond. At a median follow-up of 385 days (range, 24 to 820 days), 25 patients (55%) were alive in complete remission. Although longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome, the study shows that this regimen is associated with a durable engraftment, has a low nonrelapse mortality rate, and can induce clinical and molecular remissions.

Background:

Introduction.The outcome of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas, not eligible or cured by high dose chemotherapy due to persistent disease, is very unsatisfactory. The introduction of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) in this setting, showed impressive long-term results in registrative trials. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are registered and reimbursed in Italy by Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients after at least 2 lines, with an ECOG 0-1, and an age lower than 71 years. To evaluate in real-life the patients treated in Italy with CAR-T cells, the Italian Society of Hematology (SIE) designed an observational study.

Introduction:Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) have a 40-50% cure rate when treated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide-vincristine-prednisone (CHOEP) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, showed promising activity in relapsed or refractory PTCLs.

Chiappella: Roche: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Incyte: Other: lecture fee; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Celgene Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Clinigen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Novartis: Other: lecture fee; Janssen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Gilead Sciences: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Astrazeneca: Other: lecture fee; Servier: Other: lecture fee. Flenghi: Roche: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses. Zilioli: Gentilli: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Other, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Consultancy. Cavallo: Servier: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Musuraca: roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Varettoni: janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Corradini: Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy.Romidepsin is not registered in first line treatment. Romidepsin was provided free for the clinical trial.

Chiappella: Celgene Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Incyte: Other: lecture fee; Novartis: Other: lecture fee; Astrazeneca: Other: lecture fee; Servier: Other: lecture fee; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Gilead Sciences: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Clinigen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Roche: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Janssen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board. Corradini: AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations.

Chiappella: Gilead Sciences: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Roche: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Clinigen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Celgene Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Astrazeneca: Other: lecture fee; Janssen: Other: lecture fee, advisory board; Incyte: Other: lecture fee; Novartis: Other: lecture fee; Servier: Other: lecture fee. Santoro: Eli-Lilly: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Arqule: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tisi: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BWS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Perriello: Novartis: Other: Advisory Board. Corradini: AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie, ADC Theraputics, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen, KyowaKirin, Nerviano Medical Science, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda: Honoraria; KiowaKirin; Incyte; Daiichi Sankyo; Janssen; F. Hoffman-La Roche; Kite; Servier: Consultancy; Amgen; Takeda; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations; Novartis; Gilead; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel and accommodations; BMS: Other: Travel and accommodation; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Gilead/Kite, Amgen, AbbVie: Other: travel and accomodations.

Corradini: Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; KiowaKirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; BMS: Other; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for. Zinzani:Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kirin Kyowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Options are limited for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) for whom the median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) are less than 6 months. Patients who are candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be cured should they achieve adequate response to salvage therapy prior to transplant. Patients who relapse after transplant or who are not transplant candidates are often treated with sequential single-agent therapies with non-curative intent. Only four agents are FDA-approved for the treatment of R/R PTCL including pralatrexate, romidepsin and belinostat. The objective response rate to each of these agents is only 25-30% and duration of response (DOR) is limited. For a specific subtype of PTCL, namely systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, single-agent brentuximab vedotin (BV) treatment resulted in an 86% overall response rate (ORR) and a 57% complete response (CR) rate in R/R disease. A phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and PTCL not otherwise specified reporting an ORR of 41% (Horwitz et al, Blood. 2014).

The feasibility and toxicity of allogeneic stem cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning including thiotepa, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide have been investigated in 6 patients with breast cancer and 7 patients with renal cell cancer. The program included the use of escalating doses of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and/or interferon alpha (IFNα) for patients showing no tumor response and no graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Patients were at high risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM) because of age, advanced stage, and previous treatments. We observed a partial remission in 4 renal cancer and in 2 breast cancer patients (one at the molecular level in the bone marrow), occurring after cyclosporine withdrawal or after DLI and/or IFNα. All the responses were accompanied by the occurrence of acute GVHD. We conclude that reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a feasible procedure in renal and breast cancer, and that the exploitation of graft-versus-tumor effect after DLI is a promising finding.

The feasibility and toxicity of allogeneic stem cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning including thiotepa, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide have been investigated in 6 patients with breast cancer and 7 patients with renal cell cancer. The program included the use of escalating doses of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) and/or interferon alpha (IFNα) for patients showing no tumor response and no graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Patients were at high risk of transplant-related mortality (TRM) because of age, advanced stage, and previous treatments. We observed a partial remission in 4 renal cancer and in 2 breast cancer patients (one at the molecular level in the bone marrow), occurring after cyclosporine withdrawal or after DLI and/or IFNα. All the responses were accompanied by the occurrence of acute GVHD. We conclude that reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a feasible procedure in renal and breast cancer, and that the exploitation of graft-versus-tumor effect after DLI is a promising finding.

Rossi: Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Carlo-Stella:Takeda: Other: Travel, accommodations; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Genenta Science srl: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Travel, accommodations; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Corradini:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; KiowaKirin: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Jazz Pharmaceutics: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Servier: Honoraria; BMS: Other: Travel Costs.

Introduction:Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is an heterogeneous disease: 30-40% of cases have high expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (Dual Expressor, DE) and 5-10% have chromosomal rearrangements involving MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 (Double-/ Triple-Hit, DH/TH). Although the optimal treatment for those high-risk lymphomas remains undefined, DA-EPOCH-R produces durable remission with acceptable toxicity (Dunleauvy K, Lancet 2018). TP53 mutation is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients (pts) with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP therapy. However, its prognostic value in poor prognosis lymphomas, receiving intensive therapy, has not been investigated yet. Methods:A series of consecutive pts (n=87) with biopsy proven diagnosis of DE DLBCL (MYC expression ≥40% and BCL2 expression ≥ 50% of tumor cells) or DE-Single Hit (DE-SH, i.e., DE-DLBCL with a single rearrangement of either MYC, BCL2 or BCL6 oncogenes) or DE-DH/TH (MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements obtained by FISH) were treated with 6 cycles of DA-EPOCH-R and central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis consisting of two courses of high-dose intravenous Methotrexate. Additional eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years and adequate organ functions. Cell of origin (COO) was defined according to Hans algorithm [germinal center B cell like (GCB) and non GCB)]. TP3 mutations were evaluated by next generation sequencing (NGS) based on AmpliseqTM technology or Sanger sequencing and considered positive when a variant allelic frequency≥10% was detected. Results:Eighty-seven pts were included [n=36 DE only, n=32 DE-SH (n=8 MYC, n=10 BCL2, n=14 BCL6), n=19 DE-DH/TH] with 40 patients (46%) showing a non GCB COO. Pts had a median age of 59 years (range, 24-79 years). Seventy-three pts (84%) had advanced disease and 44 (50%) an high-intermediate/high-risk score as defined by International Prognostic Index (IPI). Only 8 of 87 pts (9%) were consolidated in first clinical remission with autologous stem cell transplantation following DA-EPOCH-R. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 73 are alive (84%) and 14 died [n=12 disease (n=2 CNS disease); n=1 pneumonia; n=1 suicide]. The 2-year PFS and OS were 71% (95%CI, 60-80%) and 76% (95%CI, 61%-85%) for the entire population. For those with IPI 3-5 the PFS and OS were not significant different for DE and DE-SH pts versus DE-DH/TH pts [64% vs 57% p=0.77); 78% vs 57% p=0.12)]. The COO did not influence the outcome for DE only and DE-SH [PFS: 78% vs 71% (p=0.71); 92% vs 86% (p=0.16) for GCB vs non -GCB, respectively]. Fourty-six pts (53%;n=18 DE only, n=18 DE-SH, n=10 DE-DH/TH ) were evaluated for TP53 mutations with 11 pts (24%) carrying a clonal mutation (n=6 in DE, n=3 in DE-SH, n=2 in DE-DH/TH). The 2-year PFS and OS did not significantly change for pts DE and DE-SH TP53 wild type as compared to DE and DE-SH mutated [PFS: 84 % vs 77%, (p=0.45); OS: 87% vs 88%, (p=0.92)]. The two pts DE-DH/TH with TP53 mutation are alive and in complete remission.Conclusions:High risk DLBCL pts treated with DA-EPOCH-R have a favourable outcome independently from high IPI score, DE-SH and DE-DH/TH. Also the presence of TP53 mutations does not negatively affect the outcome of pts treated with this intensive regimen. The efficacy of DA-EPOCH-R in overcoming poor prognostic genetic features in DLBCL should be confirmed in a larger prospective clinical trial.

Corradini: Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; KiowaKirin: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Sanofi: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Costs; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceutics: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; BMS: Other: Travel Costs.

BACKGROUND.Axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel have been approved by FDA and EMA for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell and mediastinal Lymphoma (NHL) patients (pts). Selection of pts who can benefit the most from these novel treatments with a low risk of life-threatening toxicities is currently a matter of discussion and outside clinical trials the selection of pts is up to clinicians of the CAR T-cell team in several countries. However, based on the results and follow up of clinical trials and the US reports about real life treatment with CAR T-cells, it is emerging that an expert clinical assessment and application of some inclusion criteria could optimize the success of therapy and minimize the severity of adverse events.

Introduction.The recommended treatment for newly diagnosed nodal Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) patients eligible to high-dose therapy is cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine plus etoposide (CHOEP) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) in chemo-sensitive disease. However, 25-30% of patients experienced primary refractoriness or early progression. Romidepsin (Ro), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, showed antitumor activity and a manageable toxicity profile in PTCLs. On these bases, we designed the FIL-PTCL13 phase Ib/II study (NCT02223208), aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Ro in addition to CHOEP followed by consolidation with auto or allogeneic-SCT according to clinical response, and to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of this combination as first line in PTCLs. Patients and methods. Inclusion criteria were: untreated PTCL not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic, ALK negative anaplastic lymphoma at stage II-IV, aged 18-65. Treatment scheme was: an induction with 6 courses of CHOEP every 21 days combined with Ro at the allocated dose, at day 1 and 8 of each cycle (Ro-CHOEP). Patient in complete (CR) or partial response (PR) without an available donor, received one course of cisplatin, citarabine, desamethasone (DHAP) followed by stem cell harvest and proceeded to auto-SCT; patients in PR and with an available donor, were sent to upfront allogeneic-SCT. Romidepsin dose allocation for sequential cohorts of 3 patients at each dose was defined according to the Continual Reassessment Method (O'Quigley and Zohar, 2006). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Ro-CHOEP were: any grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity (according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) or a delay >15 days of planned cycle date, observed during the first 2 cycles. The MTD of Ro was defined as the dose that achieved a DLT in 33% of patients. Four dose levels of Ro were tested, namely 8, 10, 12 and 14 mg/ms. Results. From September 2014 to July 2017, 21 patients were enrolled into the phase Ib part of the study. Clinical characteristics were: median age 57 years (IQR 53;61); bone marrow involvement in 6 (29%) patients; stage III-IV in 18 (86%); International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk ≥3 in 8 (38%). The first cohort of 3 patients was treated with Ro at 12 mg/ms, and no DLTs were observed; the subsequent 6 cohorts were treated with Ro at 14 mg/ms. Nine DLTs were reported in 7 patients: 3 events of grade (g)3 mucositis and one event of g3 maculopapular rash, g3 fatigue, g3 fever, g3 respiratory failure, g3 typhlitis and g4 neutropenic fever. The observed toxicity was 35.2% (95%CI: 17.1%-56.5%) and prompted to define 14 mg/ms the recommended dose of Ro in addition to CHOEP. No unexpected toxicities and no toxic deaths were reported. The most frequent toxicities reported during Ro-CHOEP were g3-4 neutropenia in 38% and thrombocytopenia in 45% of all the performed 117 courses. Severe extra-hematological toxicities by patients were: g3 arrhythmia in one (5%), g3 gastrointestinal in 3 (14%) and g3-4 infections in 5 (24%). The addition of Ro during induction did not impact the harvest, with a median of 4.3 × 10⁶ (IQR 3.4-5.71) peripheral blood CD34-positive cells/Kilogram collected. At least 90% of the planned dose of doxorubicine, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and vincristine were administered in: 87%, 86%, 83% and 89% of Ro-CHOEP, respectively. Median interval time between Ro-CHOEP was 21 days (range 19-36). At the end of induction 12/21 (57%) patients obtained CR and underwent auto-SCT, one patient (5%) in PR received auto-SCT due to lack of identical donor; 8 (38%) did not perform SCT due to lymphoma progression in 7 and to toxicity in one. At a median follow-up of 26 months, 12-months Progression Free Survival was 52% (95%CI: 29-71) and 12-months Overall Survival was 76% (95%CI: 52-89). Biomarkers and biological analysis are ongoing. The enrollment of the phase II part of the study is still open. Conclusions.The phase Ib FIL-PTCL13 part of the study defined Romidepsin 14 mg/ms on day 1 and day 8 as the MTD, when administered in combination to CHOEP as induction prior consolidation with up-front SCT, in untreated young PTCLs patients. The addition of Ro to chemotherapy did not impact the feasibility of CHOEP, without unexpected toxicities. The efficacy of this scheme is under investigation in the phase II part of the study.

Bolli: Celgene: Honoraria. Chiappella:Roche: Other: lecture fees; Amgen: Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecture fees; Nanostring: Other: lecture fees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecture fees; Teva: Other: lecture fees. Corradini:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sandoz: Other: Advisory Board; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Lecturer.

Historically, the differential diagnosis between different nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes based on morphological and phenotypic grounds has posed great challenges. In the last few years, our knowledge of the molecular bases of different PTCLs has significantly expanded. However, peripheral T-cell lymphomas not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOSs) are still regarded to as a heterogeneous category encompassing PTCL cases not fitting other, more homogeneous, subtypes. In fact, PTCL-NOS is one of the few lymphoma subtypes where no recurrent driver mutations have been reported so far.

Chiappella: Nanostring: Other: lecture fees; Teva: Other: lecture fees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecture fees; Amgen: Other: lecture fees; Roche: Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecture fees.

Molecular classification of the different nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) entities is not yet clarified, and this particularly applies to the two main clinical subtypes: angio-immunoblastic T-lymphomas (AITL) and PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS). Previous studies have shown that these two entities bear distinct gene expression profiles (GEP) that allow their distinction. However, clinical usage of GEP has been limited due to its complexity and to the absence of a well validated signature. Following the recent advances in next generation sequencing (NGS), three recurrently mutated genes (RHOA, TET2, DNMT3A) were found in approximately 60-70% of AITL and in 20-30% of PTCL-NOS. In addition, 20-30% of AITLs cases are characterized by a hotspot IDH2R172mutation that is generally absent in PTCL-NOSs. Furthermore, the interrelationship of the mutations with the AITL/PTCL-NOS GEP classification has not been comprehensively evaluated.

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) encompass rare and heterogeneous forms of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma generally associated with dismal clinical outcome. Given the poor prognosis, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been integrated in the treatment algorithms in the relapsed/refractory setting; however poor response to salvage therapies often hampers the possibility to benefit from this potentially curative approach. We report our institutional experience on the outcome of patients with relapsed PTCL eligible to allo-HSCT in an intention to treat (ITT) analysis.

Reda: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding.

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Cascavilla: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria.

Introduction:chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an indolent disease, but 17p deleted (del) and/or patients who experience early relapse or not responding to chemoimmunotherapy have a very poor outcome. In these patients an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is indicated, whenever possible. B-cell receptor inhibitors (BCRi) have shown high efficacy with a low toxicity, making the choice of an alloSCT challenging even in high risk patients. The aim of the study is to highlight the outcome of different clinical approaches available in the era of the new drugs.

Introduction:Patients with refractory and relapsed B-cell lymphomas have few curative options. Despite novel target therapies, only patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can achieve a long-term disease control. A lot of effort has been done over the last years to produce strategies reducing non-relapse mortality (NRM) without damaging the graft-versus-lymphoma effect. We conducted a multicenter prospective phase II trial to evaluate the benefit of high-dose Rituximab (R) in the conditioning regimen before alloSCT. The primary end-point of the study was progression-free (PFS) survival. We evaluated also the long-term outcome with the novel composite end-point of graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Methods:The study enrolled 121 adult patients who received alloSCT for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas [n=35 (28%) follicular lymphomas; n=29 (24%) chronic-lymphocytic leukemia; n=35 (28%) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas; n= 22 (18%) mantle cell lymphomas]. The median age was 52 years (range, 23-65). Seventy-four pts (61%) failed a previous autograft. The conditioning regimen consisted of thiotepa (12 mg/kg), cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg) and fludarabine (60 mg/m2) and high-dose of rituximab (500 mg/m2 on day-6),. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was based on cyclosporine and mini-methotrexate; ATG (7 mg/kg) was given to the patients allografted from unrelated donors. Sixty-seven (55%) and fifty-four (45%) patients received grafts from related and unrelated donors, respectively. Results:At a median follow-up of 41 months (range 6-95 months), the estimated 3-years PFS and overall survival (OS) were 50% (95%CI, 41%-61%) and 61% (95%CI, 51%-71%), respectively. The 1 and 3-years GRFS were 40% (95%CI, 32%-50%) and 34% (95%CI, 26%-44%), respectively. The GRFS was significantly better in patients affected by indolent disease (43% versus 22%, long-rank test, p=0.02); in addition there was a tendency for better GRFS for those transplanted from unrelated donors (41% versus 27%, p=0.096). The 3-years GRFS were 41% and 30% in patients with complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) at the time of transplant, respectively (p=0.185). The multivariate analysis showed that patients affected by aggressive histotype and with bone marrow (BM) infiltration at time of transplant had a poor outcome in terms of PFS, OS and GRFS [hystotype: PFS, HR 3.30 (p=0.003); OS, HR 3.73 (p=0.007); GRFS, HR 2.02 (p=0.026); BM infiltration: PFS, HR 4.79 (p<0.001); OS, HR 6.00 (p<0.001); GRFS, HR 2.7 (p=0.004)]. The crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of NRM was 21% (95%CI, 14%-30%) at 3-years whereas the CCI of acute GVHD grade II-IV was 22% (95%CI,15%-30%). The CCI of acute GVHD was not statistically significant different in matched sibling donors and unrelated donors (21% versus 22%, respectively p=0.717). According to the modified Seattle criteria, the CCI of extensive GVHD was 17% (95%CI, 11%-27%) whereas the limited form was 27% (95%CI, 19%-39%). In the univariable Fine and Gray model, the only factor that was protective against the occurrence of chronic GVHD was the transplant from unrelated donors when R and ATG were combined together [HR 0.50 (95%CI, 0.25-0.99), p=0.05]. In fact, the CCI of chronic GVHD at 3-years from matched sibling donors was 54% (95%CI,42%-71%) as opposed to 31% from unrelated donors (95%CI, 19%-49%) (p=0.04). Conclusions:Our trial showed:1) R did not improve PFS as compared with our historical control; 2) the combination of R and ATG is synergistic and resulted protective against chronic GVHD; 3) GRFS analysis showed that 34% of the patients are alive without any complications at 3-years after allograft and this should be the standard to compare novel drug results. Future protocols should consider the use of GRFS as endpoint and inclusion of ATG also for those receiving sibling grafts.

Background:Second-line salvage chemotherapy(CT) followed by high-dose (HD) CT and autologous stem cells reinfusion (ASCT) is standard treatment forR/R HL patients, although long-term cure can be achieved in only half of them, depending on risk factors. Chemosensitivity to salvage CT before ASCT, mainly represented by a negative PET scan, is highly predictive of a favorable outcome. The availability of new markers of prognosis, like the measurement of the serum chemokineTARC, could help identifying those patients who may require further treatment, i.e. new drugs like Brentuximab Vedotin or Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab, before ASCT, in order to achieve a durable remission.Therefore we planned to prospectively evaluate the prognostic role of serum TARC levels collected at different time points in cHL R/R patients.

INTRODUCTION:The diagnosis of Peripheral T-cell lymphomas not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) is currentlybased on an "exclusion criteria" model, since PTCL-NOS lack pathognomonic features. Nevertheless, based on gene expression data, Iqbal et al(Blood 2014) have recently identified two different PTCL-NOS subgroups with different biological and prognostic features that accounts for approximately 80% of the cases and have different biological and prognostic features: one characterized by TBX21 overexpression and T-CD8+ molecular profile; the other by GATA3 overexpression and T-CD4+ profile. Herein, we used a wide comprehensive gene expression profiling (GEP) data set in order to further investigate the molecular features of different PTCL-NOS molecular entities.

Background:Approximately 50% of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) enter long-term remission after standard chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Patients who do not respond to chemotherapy have few treatment options highlighting the critical need for new effective and targeted therapeutics. Aberrant T cell receptor (TCR) and tyrosine kinase (TK) signaling have been described in PTCL (Agostinelli 2014;Netchiporouka 2014). Single-agent TK inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved patient outcomes across multiple tumor subtypes. However, TKI therapy is rarely curative. The recent discovery of a subgroup of PTCL characterized by high levels of GATA3 and c-Myc expression and poor prognosis (Iqbal 2014; Manso 2016), establishes the rationale of targeting c-Myc in PTCLs. Based on the demonstration that pharmacologic inhibition of c-Myc is achievable through targeting bromodomain and extra terminal (BET) family of chromatin adapters, the therapeutic potential of BET inhibition was assessed in a panel of T cell lymphoma and leukemia cell lines. Since expression of c-Myc is regulated by the TCR, we also hypothesized that simultaneous targeting of c-Myc and TCR would significantly enhance the antiproliferative effects of BET inhibitors (BETis) and TKI alone in preclinical models of PTCL.