1. Genetic risk stratification and outcomes among treatment-naive patients with AML treated with venetoclax and azacitidine.
- Author
-
Döhner H, Pratz KW, DiNardo CD, Wei AH, Jonas BA, Pullarkat VA, Thirman MJ, Récher C, Schuh AC, Babu S, Li X, Ku G, Liu Z, Sun Y, Potluri J, Dail M, Chyla B, and Pollyea DA
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prognosis, Risk Assessment, Treatment Outcome, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Azacitidine therapeutic use, Azacitidine administration & dosage, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic therapeutic use, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic administration & dosage, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute drug therapy, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality, Sulfonamides therapeutic use, Sulfonamides administration & dosage
- Abstract
Abstract: The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) genetic risk classification systems are based on response to intensive chemotherapy; their ability to discriminate outcomes in older patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine may be suboptimal. This pooled analysis of the phase 3 VIALE-A trial (NCT02993523) and phase 1b study (NCT02203773) examined prognostic stratification according to the 2017 and 2022 ELN risk classifications and derived new molecular signatures differentiating venetoclax-azacitidine-treated patients based on overall survival (OS). Overall, 279 patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine and 113 patients treated with placebo-azacitidine were analyzed. The ELN 2017 or 2022 prognostic criteria classified most patients as adverse-risk AML (60.2% and 72.8% for venetoclax-azacitidine and 65.5% and 75.2% for placebo-azacitidine, respectively). Although outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine improved across all ELN risk groups compared with placebo-azacitidine, ELN classification systems poorly discriminated venetoclax-azacitidine outcomes. By applying a bioinformatic algorithm, new molecular signatures were derived differentiating OS outcomes with venetoclax-azacitidine. The mutational status of TP53, FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD), NRAS, and KRAS categorized patients into higher-, intermediate-, and lower-benefit groups (52%, 25%, and 23% of patients, respectively), each associated with a distinct median OS (26.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.2-32.7]; 12.1 months [95% CI, 7.3-15.2]; and 5.5 months [95% CI, 2.8-7.6], respectively). ELN prognostic classifiers did not provide clinically meaningful risk stratification of OS outcomes in patients treated with venetoclax-azacitidine. TP53, FLT3-ITD, NRAS, and KRAS mutation status allows the classification of these patients into 3 risk groups with distinct differences in median OS. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02993523 and #NCT02203773., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF