3 results on '"Jan Mitschke"'
Search Results
2. Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA for Noninvasive Disease Detection, Risk Stratification, and MRD Monitoring in Patients with CNS Lymphoma
- Author
-
Jurik Andreas Mutter, Stefan Alig, Eliza Maria Lauer, Mohammad Shahrokh Esfahani, Jan Mitschke, David M. Kurtz, Julia Kühn, Sabine Bleul, Mari Olsen, Chih Long Liu, Michael C. Jin, Charles Macaulay, Nicolas Noel Neidert, Timo Volk, Sebastian Rauer, Dieter Henrik Heiland, Jürgen Finke, Justus Duyster, Julius Wehrle, Marco Prinz, Gerald Illerhaus, Peter C. Reinacher, Elisabeth Schorb, Maximilian Diehn, Ash A. Alizadeh, and Florian Scherer
- Subjects
Immunology ,Cell Biology ,Hematology ,Biochemistry - Abstract
Introduction: Clinical outcomes for patients with central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) are remarkably heterogeneous, yet identification of patients at high risk for treatment failure remains challenging with existing methods. In addition, diagnosis of CNSL requires invasive neurosurgical biopsies that carry procedural risks and often cannot be performed in frail or elderly patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown great potential as a noninvasive biomarker in systemic lymphomas. Yet, previous studies revealed low ctDNA detection rates in blood plasma of CNSL patients. In this study, we utilized ultrasensitive targeted high-throughput sequencing technologies to explore the role of ctDNA for disease classification, MRD detection, and early prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with CNSL. Methods: We applied Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq) and Phased Variant Enrichment and Detection Sequencing (PhasED-Seq, Kurtz et al, Nat Biotech 2021) to 85 tumor biopsies, 131 plasma samples, and 62 CSF specimens from 92 CNSL patients and 44 patients with other brain cancers or inflammatory cerebral diseases, targeting 794 distinct genetic regions. Concentrations of ctDNA were correlated with radiological measures of tumor burden and tested for associations with clinical outcomes at distinct clinical time points. We further developed a novel classifier to noninvasively distinguish CNS lymphomas from other CNS tumors based on their mutational landscapes in plasma and CSF, using supervised training of a machine learning approach from tumor whole genome sequencing data and own genotyping analyses, followed by its independent validation. Results: We identified genetic aberrations in 100% of CNSL tumor biopsies (n=63), with a median of 262 mutations per patient. Pretreatment plasma ctDNA was detectable in 78% of plasma samples and in 100% of CSF specimens (Fig. 1a), with ctDNA concentrations ranging from 0.0004 - 5.94% allele frequency (AF, median: 0.01%) in plasma and 0.0049 - 50.47% AF (median: 0.62%) in CSF (Fig. 1b). Compared to ctDNA concentrations in patients with systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, data from Kurtz et al., J Clin Oncol, 2018), plasma ctDNA levels in CNSL were in median more than 200-fold lower (Fig. 1b). We observed a significant correlation of ctDNA concentrations with total radiographic tumor volumes (TRTV) measured by MRI (Fig. 1c,d), but no association with clinical risk scores (i.e., MSKCC score) or concurrent steroid treatment. Assessment of ctDNA at pretreatment time points predicted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both as continuous and binary variable (Fig. 1e,f). Notably, patients could be stratified into risk groups with particularly favorable or poor prognoses by combining ctDNA and TRTV as pretreatment biomarkers (Fig. 1g). Furthermore, ctDNA positivity during curative-intent induction therapy was significantly associated with clinical outcomes, both PFS and OS (Fig. 1h). Finally, we applied our novel machine learning classifier to 207 specimens from an independent validation cohort of CNSL and Non-CNSL patients. We observed high specificity (100%) and positive predictive value (100%) for noninvasive diagnosis of CNSL, with a sensitivity of 57% for CSF and 21% for plasma, suggesting that a significant subset of CNSL patients might be able to forego invasive surgical biopsies. Conclusions: We demonstrate robust and ultrasensitive detection of ctDNA at various disease milestones in CNSL. Our findings suggest that ctDNA accurately mirrors tumor burden and serves as a valuable clinical biomarker for risk stratification, outcome prediction, and surgery-free lymphoma classification in CNSL. We foresee an important potential future role of ctDNA as a decision-making tool to guide treatment in patients with CNSL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Esfahani: Foresight Diagnostics: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Kurtz: Genentech: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Foresight Diagnostics: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Schorb: Riemser Pharma GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Diehn: BioNTech: Consultancy; RefleXion: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Foresight Diagnostics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; CiberMed: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties; Illumina: Research Funding; Varian Medical Systems: Research Funding. Alizadeh: Foresight Diagnostics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria; CAPP Medical: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Forty Seven: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Cibermed: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.
- Published
- 2021
3. Functional Characterization of Epigenetic Modifiers of Demethylating Therapy in AML
- Author
-
Cornelius Miething, Pia Veratti, Khalid Shoumariyeh, Desiree Melanie Redhaber, Justus Duyster, Jessica Beckert, Silvia Schäfer, Sophia Ehrenfeld, Jan Mitschke, and Laurent Phely
- Subjects
Immunology ,Cancer research ,Cell Biology ,Hematology ,Epigenetics ,Biology ,Biochemistry - Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults, and remains a difficult to treat disease, especially in elderly patients. AML arises in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and frequently carries alterations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation. Furthermore, azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC), two nucleoside analogs inhibiting DNA methylation (DNMTi), have shown clinical efficacy in the therapy of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML, highlighting the importance of epigenetic regulation in AML. Up to now, the mechanism of action of AZA and DAC in AML has not been fully elucidated, and reliable biomarkers of therapy response to these drugs do not yet exist. To identify epigenetic response modifiers towards AZA and DAC treatment, we conducted a pooled shRNA-based screen in three human leukemia cell lines using an inducible custom shRNA library targeting more than 660 different genes involved in epigenetic pathways. After selection of retrovirally infected cells, shRNA expression was induced and a fraction of cells were treated with either AZA, DAC or left untreated. 10 days after shRNA induction, genomic DNA was extracted and deep-sequenced to identify genes conferring a selective advantage/disadvantage under these conditions. By comparing shRNA representation changes between the differentially treated groups, we identified multiple candidate genes sensitizing or protecting leukemic cells to/from AZA and DAC treatment. Notably, the DNMT1 gene itself expectedly emerged as an important sensitizer to DNMTi, as did other CXXC domain-containing genes binding to (un-)methylated CpG domains. Another prominent set of genes in the pooled analysis belonged to the DNA damage pathway, including genes such as PARP1 and BRCA1. The identified candidate genes were validated and confirmed in more than 80% when tested in single shRNAs competition assays. Their impact on DNA methylation and gene expression is currently being assessed, with ongoing experiments focusing on the mechanistic role of some of the validated target, as well as the clinical potential for combinatorial therapies. Thus, using an unbiased functional genetic approach, we identified multiple genes including CpG binding proteins and members of the DNA damage pathway as important modulators of DNMTi response. Our results will increase our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving DNMTi efficacy, and may help to identify new biomarkers and novel targets for combinational therapy in AML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
- Published
- 2018
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.