Search

Cytogenetics has long represented a critical component in the clinical evaluation of hematologic malignancies. Chromosome banding studies provide a simultaneous snapshot of genome-wide copy number and structural variation, which have been shown to drive tumorigenesis, define diseases, and guide treatment. Technological innovations in sequencing have ushered in our present-day clinical genomics era. With recent publications highlighting novel sequencing technologies as alternatives to conventional cytogenetic approaches, we, an international consortium of laboratory geneticists, pathologists, and oncologists, describe herein the advantages and limitations of both conventional chromosome banding and novel sequencing technologies and share our considerations on crucial next steps to implement these novel technologies in the global clinical setting for a more accurate cytogenetic evaluation, which may provide improved diagnosis and treatment management. Considering the clinical, logistic, technical, and financial implications, we provide points to consider for the global evolution of cytogenetic testing., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

We analyzed the impact of CD34+ cell dose on the outcome of 86 patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The RIC was based on fludarabine 150 mg/m2 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 or busulphan 10 mg/kg. A median of 5.68 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg and 2.86 x 108 CD3+ cells/kg were infused. All patients receiving more than percentile 75 (p75) of CD34+ cells reached complete chimerism in T lymphocytes by days 21 to 28, compared with 44% among those receiving p75 or fewer cells (P =.046). Overall, 30.3% patients developed grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Among 83 evaluable patients, 55.8% developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The dose of CD34+ cells infused did influence the development of cGVHD, with a cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD of 74% vs 47% (P =.02) among patients receiving more than p75 CD34+ cells vs those receiving p75 or fewer. Projected overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 43 months were 60% and 46%, respectively. Neither the dose of CD34+ cells nor the dose of CD3+ cells infused significantly influenced OS and EFS, although among patients categorized as high-risk, 36% of those receiving p75 or fewer CD34+ cells relapsed or progressed, compared with only 9% among those receiving more than p75 CD34+ cells (P =.07). Among patients receiving p75 or fewer CD34+ cells, 36% of high-risk patients relapsed, compared with 10% of low- and intermediate-risk patients (P =.004), while relapse rates were not significantly different between both subgroups when we infused more than p75 CD34+ cells, thus indicating that infusing high doses of CD34+ cells ameliorates the negative effect of advanced disease status at transplantation. cGVHD was associated with better EFS (63% vs 16% at 43 months for patients with and without cGVHD; P <.0001) and better OS (78% vs 28% for patients with and without cGHVD; P <.001). The number of CD34+ cells infused should be tailored to prevent extensive cGVHD among patients categorized as low-risk, while high-risk patients, in whom the graft-versus-leukemia effect may determine disease outcome, should receive high doses of CD34+ cells.