Search

Objective: To evaluate whether the position of the working channel affects the effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy. Materials and Methods: We compared the ureteroscopes Flex‐X2S and Flex‐XC (working channel at the 9 and 3 o'clock positions, respectively) in eight cavities of a K‐Box model, simulating the distribution of the right and left intrarenal calyces. In the first and second settings, each cavity contained a 1‐cm stone, lying on the bottom and fixed on the anterior sheet covering the box, respectively. In the third setting, the posterior and lateral surface of each cavity was draped with graph paper. Once the flexible ureteroscope entered each cavity, we measured and compared (i) the proportion of stone surface targeted by the laser (STL) and (ii) the proportion of graph paper burned by the laser (PBL) obtained with the two instruments. Results: Higher STLs and PBLs were obtained with the 3 o'clock position than the 9 o'clock position in the right posterior and left anterior cavities (mean ± sd STL 87% ± 15% vs 46% ± 38% and 78% ± 35% vs 43% ± 24%, respectively; P < 0.05), and on the right posterior surfaces of the middle‐lower/lower cavities (PBL 72% vs 31% and 77% vs 35%, respectively; P < 0.01) and on the left lateral surface of the lower cavities (PBL 45% vs 25%; P = 0048), respectively. Conversely, the 9 o'clock position provided higher STLs and PBLs than the 3 o'clock position in the left posterior and right anterior cavities (mean ± sd STL 84% ± 20% vs 65% ± 28% and 79% ± 30% vs 44% ± 35%, respectively; P ≤ 0.02), and on the left posterior and right lateral surfaces of the lower cavities (PBL 59% vs 34% and 50% vs 21%, respectively; P ≤ 0.04). Conclusions: The position of the working channel of the flexible ureteroscope should be considered when planning flexible ureteroscopy, especially when dealing with the lower pole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study the prevalence and the risk associated with prediabetes (PreDM) in primary infertile men. Patients and methods: Data from 744 infertile men were analysed. Health‐significant comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Serum hormones were measured in every man. Semen analysis was based on 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) reference criteria. PreDM was defined according to the clinical criteria detailed by the American Diabetes Association (Diabetes Care 2014; 37 (Suppl. 1): S81). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses tested the association between PreDM status, hormonal milieu and seminal parameters. The predictive accuracy of all variables was evaluated using the area under the curve, and the clinical net benefit estimated by decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Of the 744 men, PreDM was found in 114 (15.4%). Men with PreDM (+PreDM) were older, had higher CCI scores, lower total testosterone and sex hormone‐binding globulin but higher follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) and 17β‐oestradiol values compared to those without PreDM (−PreDM) (all P ≤ 0.04). Higher sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI; P = 0.014) and idiopathic non‐obstructive azoospermia (iNOA; P < 0.001) were found more frequently in +PreDM men. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age, FSH and iNOA (all P ≤ 0.04) were significantly associated with +PreDM status. DCA demonstrated a clinical net benefit in discriminating men at higher risk of a +PreDM status. Conclusions: About 15% of primary infertile men had criteria suggestive of undiagnosed PreDM. A PreDM status was associated with a greater risk of hypogonadism, higher DFI values and iNOA status. Age, FSH values and iNOA status could be considered as useful parameters to recognise men with PreDM and implement early preventive interventions in those men at risk of the consequences from poor glycaemic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the relationship between the duration of infertility (DI) and the seminal parameters of a cohort of White‐European primary infertile men. Patients and Methods: Data from 1644 infertile men were analysed. Patients were grouped according to the self‐reported DI into 12‐month time frames. Semen analysis values were assessed based on 2010 World Health Organisation reference criteria. Descriptive statistics tested the difference in clinical, hormonal and seminal parameters between groups. Logistic regression models assessed the impact of DI on semen parameters. Results: A DI of <12, 13–24, 25–36, 37–48, 49–60 and >60 months was found in 207 (12.6%), 651 (39.6%), 387 (23.5%), 168 (10.2%), 92 (5.6%) and 139 (8.4%) men, respectively. Patient's age (P < 0.001) and body mass index (P < 0.001) significantly increased along with DI. Hormonal values were similar across groups. Sperm concentration significantly decreased with DI (P = 0.01). Similarly, a higher rate of non‐obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was more frequently found in men with a longer DI (P = 0.03). There were no differences in semen volume, sperm progressive motility, total motile sperm count (TMSC), and normal morphology across groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that DI was significantly associated with the risk of oligozoospermia (P < 0.001), TMSC <5 × 106 (P < 0.001), and NOA (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This cross‐sectional study showed that DI had a negative impact on semen parameters in primary infertile men. Sperm concentration was negatively associated with DI and patients with a longer DI reported higher rates of azoospermia. Furthermore, DI was significantly associated with a higher risk of oligozoospermia, low TMSC, and NOA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]