Search

• To compare long-term biochemical control of high-risk prostate cancer in those men receiving high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and radical prostatectomy (RP).• The 10-year biochemical freedom from relapse (BFR) was calculated for 243 patients who underwent either RP or combined therapy with HDRB + external beam radiotherapy + androgen deprivation between 1998 and 2000. •clinical stage ≥ T2b, or Gleason sum ≥ 8, or PSA level of20 ng/mL. Groups were appraised using the Kattan nomogram for surgery to calculate progression-free probability (PFP).• For the RP group (153 patients) the median PSA level was 8.1 ng/mL and the median age was 62.2 years. The median 5- and 10-year predicted PFP for RP was 64% and 56 %, respectively. The 5- and 10-year BFR was 65.5% and 55.4%. There was no significant difference between the predicted and the actual PFP for the RP group (P= 0.525). • For HDRB group (90 patients). The median PSA level was 14.2 ng/mL and the median age was 67.6 years. The median 5- and 10-year predicted PFP for HDRB was 46% and 35%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year BFR was 79.6% and 53.6%. There was a significant improvement between the actual and the predicted PFP for the HDRB group (P= 0.002).• Amongst a high-risk cohort, patients undergoing RP performed as predicted by the pre-treatment surgical nomogram, whereas the patients undergoing HDRB performed significantly better than was predicted by the surgical nomogram at 10 years.

Study Type - Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Only 30-35% of patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy develop recurrent disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the rate of biochemical relapse or metastasis and improves overall survival after radical prostatectomy. Various pathological factors, such as location and extent of positive margins, have been proposed as possible prognostic factors in men with margin-positive prostate cancer, however, the recent International Society of Urological Pathology consensus meeting in Boston noted that there is limited data on the significance of Gleason grade of the carcinoma at a positive margin. The present study shows that the presence of high grade prostate cancer, i.e. Gleason pattern 4 or 5, at a positive surgical margin is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Moreover, patients with lower grade carcinoma at the margin have a similar prognosis to men with negative margins. Hence, assessment of Gleason grade at the site of positive margin may aid optimal selection of patients for adjuvant radiotherapy.• To establish predictors of biochemical recurrence by analysing the pathological characteristics of positive surgical margins (PSMs), including Gleason grade of the carcinoma at the involved margin.• Clinicopathological and outcome data on 940 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1997 and 2003 were collected. • Of these, 285 (30.3%) patients with PSMs were identified for pathological review, including assessment of location of margin, linear extent, number of PSMs, plane of margin and Gleason grade (3 vs 4 or 5) at the margin.• At a median follow-up of 82 months, the biochemical recurrence rate of the PSM cohort was 29%. • On univariate analysis, the presence of Gleason grade 4 or 5 at the margin (34.4% of cases) was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 2.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.82-4.32, P0.001) compared with the presence of Gleason grade 3. • Linear extent of margin involvement was also associated with recurrence (P= 0.009). • Single vs multiple margin involvement, location, and plane of the involved margin were not significant predictors of recurrence. • On multivariate analysis, Gleason grade 4 or 5 at the margin remained an independent predictor of recurrence (HR 2.14, 95% CI = 1.29-4.03, P= 0.003).• The Gleason grade at the site of a PSM identifies patients at increased risk of biochemical recurrence and should aid stratification of patients for adjuvant radiation therapy.

• To examine whether nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) is a risk factor for positive surgical margins (PSMs) in patients with either organ-confined prostate cancer or extracapsular extension (ECE).• Clinicopathological outcome data on 945 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) were prospectively collected. • All patients underwent RP (bilateral, unilateral or non-NSS) by one surgeon between 2002 and 2007. • Risk of PSMs and their locations with respect to NSS was determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative risk factors for PSMs within pT2, pT3a and pT3b tumours.• Overall a PSM was identified in 19.6% of patients in an unscreened population with mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.1 ng/mL. • There was no significant difference in rates of PSMs between NSS groups on multivariate analysis (P= 0.147). • There was no significant difference in pT2 (P= 0.880), pT3a (P= 0.175) or pT3b (P= 0.354) tumours. • The only significant predictor of PSMs was preoperative PSA level (risk ratio 1.289, P= 0.006). • There was no significant difference in the location of PSMs except for the pT3a group, where the patients that had bilateral NSS were at higher risk of a posterolateral PSM (P= 0.028).• With appropriate selection of patients, NSS does not increase the risk of PSMs, whether the cancer is organ confined or ECE is present. • The adverse impact of the NSS procedure in the hands of an experienced surgeon is minimal and is a realistic compromise to obtain the increase in health-related quality of life offered by NSS.