Search

Objective: To compare the uterine effects of 60 mg of raloxifene with a continuous combined hormone replacement therapy, a preparation of 2 mg 17beta-oestradiol (E(2)) and 1 mg norethisterone acetate for a duration of 12 months., Design: A randomised, double-blind trial., Setting: Multicentre: Europe, Israel, South Africa., Population: Asymptomatic postmenopausal women with risk factors for osteoporosis or cardiovascular disease who had an endometrial thickness of less than 5 mm. One thousand and eight women were randomised for the six month core; of these 420 were invited to continue into a six month extension period., Methods: Randomisation to either raloxifene or continuous combined hormone replacement therapy. Patients, recruiters and assessors were blinded to the treatment used., Main Outcome Measures: The frequency of vaginal spotting/bleeding as recorded in a diary, endometrial thickness and uterine volume as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography at baseline and after 6 and 12 months., Results: After six months of therapy with raloxifene, the rate of women on raloxifene reporting vaginal bleeding and spotting (6.8%) was similar to the rate in the lead-in phase (8.3%) but increased from 7.0% to 55.1% in the continuous combined hormone replacement therapy group. Raloxifene treatment was not associated with a significant change from baseline to endpoint in mean endometrial thickness (P = 0.11), whereas continuous combined hormone replacement therapy treatment was associated with an increase in this value of mean (SD) of 1.2 (2.2) mm (P < 0.001). Compared with raloxifene, mean endometrial thickness for women on continuous combined hormone replacement therapy was significantly increased at endpoint [4.6 (2.1) mm vs 3.5 (1.7) mm; change from baseline P < 0.001]. In the raloxifene group, there was a trend towards a decrease from baseline in uterine volume [from 31.4 (20.3) to 30.3 (16.2) mm; P = 0.37]; in the continuous combined hormone replacement therapy group, there was a significant increase in uterine volume [from 31.3 (16.3) to 54.0 (36.1) mm; P < 0.001], and the difference in the effect of both compounds on change in uterine volume at endpoint reached statistical significance (P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were sustained for all parameters during the extension period. Early discontinuation rates, both overall and due to adverse events, were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the raloxifene group after 6 and 12 months., Conclusion: Compared with continuous combined hormone replacement therapy, 6 and 12 months of raloxifene treatment do not lead to vaginal bleeding/spotting, are not associated with increased endometrial thickness or uterine volume and result in a significantly lower rate of early treatment discontinuations in asymptomatic women receiving treatment to prevent long term postmenopausal health risks.

Objective: To compare continuous combined hormone replacement therapy (ccHRT) and raloxifene with respect to compliance and quality of life, which were predefined secondary endpoints of a large, prospective study designed to investigate the uterine effects of both treatments., Design: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial of six-month duration., Setting: One hundred and twenty-nine gynaecology hospital departments, clinics or practices specialised in women's healthcare, located in Europe, South Africa and Israel., Population: Healthy postmenopausal women (n = 1008)., Main Outcome Measures: Changes in quality of life using the Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) and compliance using a compliance questionnaire and pill count. Adverse event and early discontinuation rates and satisfaction with treatment using a visual analogue scale (VAS)., Results: Women taking raloxifene reported greater satisfaction with their treatment as assessed on the VAS (P = 0.004), and a lower proportion, as compared with ccHRT, reported being worried by the treatment (9.6% vs 20.2%, P < 0.01). Women taking ccHRT reported greater deterioration in scores from the WHQ for depressed mood and menstrual symptoms than those taking raloxifene (P < 0.01). For memory, vasomotor symptoms and sexual behaviour, the ccHRT group reported significantly greater mean improvements (P < 0.05). Over half (58.8%) of those taking raloxifene noticed no effect, 37.7% felt better and 3.4% felt worse as measured using the compliance questionnaire. Fifty percent of the women taking ccHRT felt better, 37.8% noticed no effect but over 10% felt worse. More women on raloxifene (94.6%) than on ccHRT (85.9%) reported that they were taking their double-blinded medication regularly (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: A lower rate of adverse event-related discontinuations, the lack of negative effects on quality of life and a smaller proportion of women being worried by the drug treatment were associated with higher treatment satisfaction and better compliance in postmenopausal women taking ccHRT or raloxifene.