Search

Objective: To compare the short- and mid-term outcomes of preterm twins by chorionicity of pregnancy.Design: Prospective nationwide population-based EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.Setting: 546 maternity units in France, between March and December 2011.Population: A total of 1700 twin neonates born between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation.Methods: The association of chorionicity with outcomes was analysed using multivariate regression models.Main Outcome Measures: First, survival at 2-year corrected age with or without neurosensory impairment, and second, perinatal, short-, and mid-term outcomes (survival at discharge, survival at discharge without severe morbidity) were described and compared by chorionicity.Results: In the EPIPAGE 2 cohort, 1700 preterm births were included (850 twin pregnancies). In all, 1220 (71.8%) were from dichorionic (DC) pregnancies and 480 from monochorionic (MC) pregnancies. MC pregnancies had three times more medical terminations than DC pregnancies (1.67 versus 0.51%, P < 0.001), whereas there were three times more stillbirths in MC than in DC pregnancies (10.09 versus 3.78%, P < 0.001). Both twins were alive at birth in 86.6% of DC pregnancies compared with 80.0% among MC pregnancies (P = 0.008). No significant difference according to chorionicity was found regarding neonatal deaths and morbidities. Likewise, for children born earlier than 32 weeks, the 2-year follow-up neurodevelopmental results were not significantly different between DC and MC twins.Conclusions: This study confirms that MC pregnancies have a higher risk of adverse outcomes. However, the outcomes among preterm twins admitted to neonatal intensive care units are similar irrespective of chorionicity.Tweetable Abstract: Monochorionicity is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, but outcomes for preterm twins are comparable irrespective of their chorionicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm twins at 5½ years by chorionicity of pregnancy. Design: Prospective nationwide population‐based EPIPAGE2 (Etude Epidémiologique sur les Petits Âges Gestationnels) cohort study. Setting: A total of 546 maternity units in France, between March and December 2011. Population: A total of 1126 twins eligible for follow‐up at 5½ years. Methods: The association of chorionicity with outcomes was analysed using multivariate regression models. Main outcome measures: Survival at 5½ years with or without neurodevelopmental disabilities (comprising cerebral palsy, visual, hearing, cognitive deficiency, behavioural difficulties or developmental coordination disorders) were described and compared by chorionicity. Results: Among the 1126 twins eligible for follow‐up at 5½ years, 926 (82.2%) could be evaluated: 228 monochorionic (MC) and 698 dichorionic (DC). Based on chronicity and gestational age of birth, we found no significant differences for severe neonatal morbidity. The rates of moderate/severe neurobehavioral disabilities were similar in infants from DC pregnancies versus infants from MC pregnancies (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65–2.28). By gestational age and without twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), no difference according to chorionicity was found for all neurodevelopmental outcome measures. Conclusions: The neurodevelopmental outcomes among preterm twins at 5½ years is similar, irrespective of chorionicity. Linked article: This article is commented on by R. N. Brown, pp. 1059 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17527. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effect of gestational age at laser therapy for twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) on perinatal outcome. Design and settings: Single retrospective observational cohort. Population All consecutive pregnancies affected by TTTS and referred to our department between January 2013 and August 2020. Methods: Gestational age was modelled both as a categorical and as a continuous variable. Log‐binomial regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (crude and adjusted for placental location, Quintero stage and cervical length) as well as the adjusted predicted probability of survival and fetal loss according to gestational age at laser therapy. Main outcomes: Fetal and neonatal survival, preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM). Results: Of the 503 pregnancies referred for TTTS, 431 were treated by laser therapy. Gestational age at laser therapy was positively and significantly associated with the overall survival at birth and at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.05–1.19), as with a reduction in double fetal loss (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71–0.92). Conversely, the rate of PPROM before 24 weeks was significantly higher in early cases (32% of PPROM <24 weeks when laser therapy was performed before 17 weeks versus 1.5% after 22 weeks, p < 0.001, aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48–0.72). Among the survivors, preterm birth before 28 weeks was significantly related to the gestational age at laser (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99), resulting in a significant impact on neonatal morbidity (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.97). Conclusion: Our results suggest a significant and independent impact of the gestational age at laser surgery on perinatal survival, PPROM and neonatal morbidity. Gestational age at laser therapy for TTTS is associated with an increased risk of perinatal mortality and mortality. Linked article: This article is commented on by Mariano Lanna, pp. 2038 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471‐0528.17237 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]