Search

A comprehensive framework has been established for understanding immunological pathways, which can be categorized into eradicated and tolerable immune responses. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are associated with specific immune responses. TH1 immunity is related to TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9, while TH2 immunity is associated with TLR1, TLR2, and TLR6. TH22 immunity is linked to TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5, and THαβ (Tr1) immunity is related to TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9. The chemokine receptor CXCR5 is a marker of follicular helper T cells, and other chemokine receptors can also be classified within a framework based on host immunological pathways. On the basis of a literature review on chemokines and immunological pathways, the following associations were identified: CCR5 with TH1 responses, CCR1 with TH1-like responses, CCR4 (basophils) and CCR3 (eosinophils) with TH2 and TH9 responses, CCR10 with TH22 responses, CCR6 with TH17 responses, CXCR3 with THαβ responses, CCR8 with regulatory T cells (Treg), and CCR2 with TH3 responses. These findings contribute to the identification of biomarkers for immune cells and provide insights into host immunological pathways. Understanding the chemokine and Toll-like receptor system is crucial for comprehending the function of the innate immune system, as well as adaptive immune responses.

Host immunological pathways are delicate to cope with different types of pathogens. In this article, we divide immunological pathways into two groups: Immunoglobulin G-related eradicable immunities and Immunoglobulin A-related tolerable immunities. Once immune cells encounter an antigen, they can become anergic or trigger immune reactions. Immunoglobulin D B cells and γδ T cells are recognizing self-antigens to become anergic. Immunoglobulin M B cells and αβ T cells can trigger host immune reactions. Eradicable immune responses can be divided into four groups: TH1/TH2/TH22/THαβ (TH-T Helper cell groups). Tolerable immune responses can be divided into four groups: TH1-like/TH9/TH17/TH3. Four groups mean hosts can cope with four types of pathogens. Cancer is related to immune dysfunction. TH1-like immunity is pro-tumor immunity and THαβ is anti-tumor immunity. TH1-like immunity is the host tolerable immunity against intracellular micro-organisms. THαβ immunity is the host eradicable immunity against viruses. Cancer is also related to clonal anergy by Immunoglobulin D B cells and γδ T cells. Oncolytic viruses are related to the activation of anti-viral THαβ immunity. M2 macrophages are related to the tolerable TH1-like immunity, and they are related to metastasis. This review is key to understanding the immune pathogenesis of cancer. We can then develop better therapeutic agents to treat cancer.

Due to its aggressiveness and high mortality rate, oral cancer still represents a tough challenge for current cancer therapeutics. Similar to other carcinomas, cancerous invasion and metastasis are the most important prognostic factors and the main obstacles to therapy for human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Fortunately, with the rise of the nanotechnical era and innovative nanomaterial fabrication, nanomaterials are widely used in biomedicine, cancer therapeutics, and chemoprevention. Recently, phytochemical substances have attracted increasing interest as adjuvants to conventional cancer therapy. The ginger phenolic compound zingerone, a multitarget pharmacological and bioactive phytochemical, possesses potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer activities. In our previous study, we generated phytochemically derived zingerone nanoparticles (NPs), and documented their superior antitumorigenic effect on human hepatoma cells. In the present study, we further investigated the effects of zingerone NPs on inhibiting the invasiveness and metastasis of human OSCC cell lines. Zingerone NPs elicited significant cytotoxicity in three OSCC cell lines compared to zingerone. Moreover, the lower dose of zingerone NPs (25 µM) markedly inhibited colony formation and colony survival by at least five-fold compared to zingerone treatment. Additionally, zingerone NPs significantly attenuated cell motility and invasiveness. In terms of the signaling mechanism, we determined that the zingerone NP-mediated downregulation of Akt signaling played an important role in the inhibition of cell viability and cell motility. Zingerone NPs inhibited matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity, which was highly correlated with the attenuation of cell migration and cell invasion. By further detecting the roles of zingerone NPs in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), we observed that zingerone NPs substantially altered the levels of EMT-related markers by decreasing the levels of the mesenchymal markers, N-cadherin and vimentin, rather than the epithelial proteins, ZO-1 and E-cadherin, compared with zingerone. In conclusion, as novel and efficient phytochemically derived nanoparticles, zingerone NPs may serve as a potent adjuvant to protect against cell invasion and metastasis, which will provide a beneficial strategy for future applications in chemoprevention and conventional therapeutics in OSCC treatment.