1. Different Effects of Implanting Sensory Nerve or Blood Vessel on the Vascularization, Neurotization, and Osteogenesis of Tissue-Engineered Bone In Vivo
- Author
-
Guoxian Pei, Tian-Wang Mu, Long Bi, Jun-jun Qin, and Junjun Fan
- Subjects
Sensory Receptor Cells ,Article Subject ,Neovascularization, Physiologic ,lcsh:Medicine ,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ,Neovascularization ,In vivo ,Blood vessel prosthesis ,Osteogenesis ,Medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Femur ,Nerve Transfer ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,General Medicine ,Anatomy ,Blood Vessel Prosthesis ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Rabbits ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Vascular Surgical Procedures ,Blood vessel ,Sensory nerve ,Research Article - Abstract
To compare the different effects of implanting sensory nerve tracts or blood vessel on the osteogenesis, vascularization, and neurotization of the tissue-engineered bone in vivo, we constructed the tissue engineered bone and implanted the sensory nerve tracts (group SN), blood vessel (group VB), or nothing (group Blank) to the side channel of the bone graft to repair the femur defect in the rabbit. Better osteogenesis was observed in groups SN and VB than in group Blank, and no significant difference was found between groups SN and VB at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The neuropeptides expression and the number of new blood vessels in the bone tissues were increased at 8 weeks and then decreased at 12 weeks in all groups and were highest in group VB and lowest in group Blank at all three time points. We conclude that implanting either blood vessel or sensory nerve tract into the tissue-engineered bone can significantly enhance both the vascularization and neurotization simultaneously to get a better osteogenesis effect than TEB alone, and the method of implanting blood vessel has a little better effect of vascularization and neurotization but almost the same osteogenesis effect as implanting sensory nerve.
- Published
- 2014