1. Evaluation of a Test Dose Strategy for Pharmacokinetically-Guided Busulfan Dosing for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Author
-
Jonathan S. Serody, Yunro Chung, Paul M. Armistead, Benjamin G. Vincent, Anastasia Ivanova, Kamakshi V. Rao, Jessica M. Davis, James M. Coghill, Jonathan R. Ptachcinski, Marcie L. Riches, Maurice Alexander, Katarzyna Jamieson, J. Ryan Shaw, Andrew Sharf, William A. Wood, and Thomas C. Shea
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Transplantation Conditioning ,Test dose ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Urology ,Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ,Disease-Free Survival ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pharmacokinetics ,Humans ,Medicine ,Dosing ,Busulfan ,Transplantation ,Adult patients ,business.industry ,Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ,Area under the curve ,Hematology ,Middle Aged ,Myeloablative Agonists ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Toxicity ,Female ,business ,030215 immunology ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Targeted busulfan dosing helps limit chemotherapy-related toxicity and optimize disease outcomes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). The objective of this study was to evaluate busulfan exposure from a pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing strategy using a test dose. This retrospective evaluation included adult patients who underwent HCT at our institution with busulfan-based myeloablative (>9 mg/kg) conditioning between January 2014 and October 2015. A weight-based test dose of 0.8 mg/kg was used with PK assessments to predict area under the curve (AUCpred) achieved with weight-based dosing, with a target AUC of 4800 µM*minute (AUCtarget). PK from the test dose was then used to calculate a PK-guided first myeloablative busulfan dose. PK assessments were also done after the first dose to assess if the goal area under the curve (AUC) had been achieved (AUCfirst). A PK-guided first dose resulted in achievement of target AUC with target ranges of ±10% in 50% of patients, ±15% in 75%, and ±20% in 94%. This was an improved rate of target achievement compared with the 33%, 44%, and 63% of patients who achieved the desired AUC for these respective target ranges when using weight-based dosing (P = .12, .004, and
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF