Search

Infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count is a prognostic factor for survival after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). CD14 + HLA-DR low/neg immunosuppressive monocytes affect tumor growth by suppressing host antitumor immunity. Thus, we set out to investigate if the infused autograft lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (A-LMR), as a biomarker of host immunity (ie, lymphocytes) and immunosuppression (ie, monocytes), affects survival after APHSCT. From 1994 to 2012, 379 DLBCL patients who underwent APHSCT were studied. The 379 patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 253) and a validation set (n = 126). Receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve identified an A-LMR ≥1 as the best cut-off value, which was validated by the k-fold cross-validation in the training set. Multivariate analysis showed A-LMR to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in the training set. Patients with an A-LMR ≥ 1.0 experienced superior overall survival (OS) compared with patients with an A-LMR <1.0 (median OS: 167.2 versus 17.6 months; 5-year OS: 73% [95% confidence interval (CI), 63% to 80%] versus 30% [95% CI, 2% to 38%], P < .0001, respectively) in the training set. In the validation set, an A-LMR ≥ 1 showed a median OS of 181.2 months versus 19.5 months for an A-LMR <1, and 5-year OS rates of 67% (95% CI, 52% to 79%) versus 35% (95% CI, 25% to 47%), P < .0001, respectively. The A-LMR provides a platform to engineer immunocompetent autograft to improve clinical outcomes in DLBCL patients undergoing APHSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A specific predictor during routine follow-up to ascertain risk for postautologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (post-APHSCT) relapse in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has not been identified. Thus, we studied if new-onset lymphopenia measured by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was a marker of post-APHSCT NHL relapse. ALC was obtained at the time of confirmed relapse, and at last follow-up with no relapse. From 1993 until 2005, 269 patients treated with APHSCT for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were included in this study. Patients at last follow-up without relapse (N=137) had a higher ALC compared with those with low ALC at the time of confirmed relapsed (N=132) (median ALC ×109/L of 1.66 versus 0.71, P < .0001, respectively). ALC at follow-up was a strong predictor for relapse with an area under the curve (AUC)=0.86 (P < .0001). An ALC <1.0×109/L at the time of confirmed relapse had a positive predictive value of 89% and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.4 to predict relapse post-APHSCT. Patients with an ALC ≥1.0×109/L (N=147) had a cumulative incidence of relapse of 19% versus 92%, with an ALC <1.0×109/L (N=122) (P < .0001). This study suggests that new-onset lymphopenia measured by ALC can be used as marker to assess risk of DLBCL relapse during routine follow-up for after APHSCT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Day 15 absolute lymphocyte count (ALC-15) after autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT) has been reported to be a significant predictor for survival in multiple hematologic malignancies. Limitations of previous reports included their retrospective nature and the lack of ALC-15 lymphocyte subset analyses. To address these limitations, from February 2002 until February 2007, 50 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients were enrolled in a prospective study. The primary endpoint of the study was to confirm prospectively the ALC-15 survival role after APHSCT in NHL. The secondary endpoint was to identify the ALC-15 lymphocyte subset affecting survival after APHSCT. With a median follow-up of 22.2 months (range: 6-63.7 months), patients with an ALC-15 ≥500 cells/μL (n = 35) experienced superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those who did not; median OS: not reached versus 5.4 months, 3-year OS rates of 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55%-95%) versus 37% (95% CI: 15%-65%), P < .0001; and median PFS: not reached versus 3.3 months, 3-year PFS rates of 63% (95% CI: 40%-85%) versus 13% (95% CI: 4%-40%), P < .0001, respectively. Univariately, CD16+/56+/CD3− natural killer (NK) cells were the only ALC-15 lymphocyte subset identified as a predictor for survival. Patients with an NK cell count ≥80 cells/μL (n = 38) experienced superior OS and PFS compared with those who did not (median OS: not reached versus 5 months, 3-year OS rates of 76% [95% CI: 57%-92%] versus 36% [95% CI: 11%-62%], P < .0001; and median PFS: not reached versus 3 months, 3-year PFS rates of 57% [95% CI: 38%-85%] versus 9% [95% CI: 1%-41%], P < .0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that NK cells are an independent predictor for survival. This is the first study confirming the ALC-15 survival role prospectively and identifying NK cells as the key ALC-15 lymphocyte subset affecting survival after APHSCT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is a rare entity with limited randomized clinical trials. • No consensus exists on the optimal consolidation strategy and conditioning regimen in primary CNS lymphoma. • Our 20-year experience at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester provides additional insights. • Disease response before transplant dictates outcome, a novel finding. A paucity of randomized phase III clinical trials in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has resulted in no uniform consensus on the optimal strategy for consolidation and conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The past 2 decades have witnessed a preference for thiotepa (TT)-based conditioning regimens due to superior central nervous system penetration. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients with PCNSL who underwent ASCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester over the past 2 decades, and the impact of TT-based conditioning regimens. Fifty-six patients underwent transplant for PCNSL, with 25 and 31 patients receiving BEAM (non-thiotepa) and carmustine (BCNU)/TT-based conditioning, respectively. All patients received high-dose methotrexate-based induction therapy. While the BCNU/TT group had higher risk disease features such as high International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group prognostic score, elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein, and older patient population, there was no significant difference at 2 years post-transplant in progression-free survival (BEAM 68.0% [46.1% to 82.5%] versus BCNU/TT, 65.5% [45.2% to 79.8%], P =.99) or overall survival (OS) (84.0% [62.8% to 93.7%] in the BEAM group versus 81.6% [61.3% to 91.9%] in the BCNU/TT group, P =.95). Disease response status before transplant significantly affected the outcomes as those in complete remission had an OS at 2 years post-transplant of 94.7% (68.1% to 99.2%) in the BEAM group and 90.5% (67.0% to 97.5%) in the BCNU/TT group compared with those in partial response, 57.1% (17.2% to 83.7%) in BCNU/TT group and 50.0% (11.1% to 80.4%) in the BEAM group, respectively (P <.0001). Our retrospective cohort adds to the currently available literature and identifies the disease status before transplant as a significant factor affecting survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We found a lower incidence of chronic GVHD in RIC haploidentical versus matched sibling donor transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma. • We found a decreased relapse in PTCy-based haploidentical versus matched sibling donor transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma. Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients with relapsed or refractory disease may benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but many lack a matched sibling donor (MSD). Herein, we compare outcomes of 2 reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT platforms in cHL: T cell–replete related donor haploidentical (haplo) HCT with a post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based approach versus an MSD/calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based approach. The study included 596 adult patients who underwent a first RIC allo-HCT for cHL between 2008 and 2016 using either a haplo-PTCy (n = 139) or MSD/CNI-based (n = 457) approach. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression, and progression-free survival (PFS). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference between haplo/PTCy and MDS/CNI-based approaches in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI],.79 to 1.45; P =.66) or PFS (HR,.86; 95% CI,.68 to 1.10; P =.22). Haplo/PTCy was associated with a significantly higher risk of grades II to IV aGVHD (odds ratio [OR], 1.73, 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.59; P =.007), but the risk of grades III to IV aGVHD was not significantly different between the 2 cohorts (OR,.61; 95% CI,.29 to 1.27; P =.19). The haplo/PTCy platform provided a significant reduction in cGVHD risk (HR,.45; 95% CI,.32 to.64; P <.001), and a significant reduction in relapse risk (HR,.74; 95% CI,.56 to.97; P =.03). There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward higher NRM with a haplo/PTCy approach (HR, 1.65; 95% CI,.99 to 2.77; P =.06). Haplo/PTCy-based approaches are associated with lower incidences of cGVHD and relapse, with PFS and OS outcomes comparable with MSD/CNI-based approaches. There was a leaning toward higher NRM with a haplo/PTCy-based platform. These data show that haplo/PTCy allo-HCT in cHL results in survival comparable with MSD/CNI-based allo-HCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) experiencing early therapy failure (ETF) within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy have poor overall survival (OS). We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) and the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS) to determine whether autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) can improve outcomes in this high-risk FL subgroup. ETF was defined as failure to achieve at least partial response after frontline chemoimmunotherapy or lymphoma progression within 2 years of frontline chemoimmunotherapy. We identified 2 groups: the non-autoHCT cohort (patients from the NLCS with ETF not undergoing autoHCT) and the autoHCT cohort (CIBMTR patients with ETF undergoing autoHCT). All patients received rituximab-based chemotherapy as frontline treatment; 174 non-autoHCT patients and 175 autoHCT patients were identified and analyzed. There was no difference in 5-year OS between the 2 groups (60% versus 67%, respectively; P  = .16). A planned subgroup analysis showed that patients with ETF receiving autoHCT soon after treatment failure (≤1 year of ETF; n = 123) had higher 5-year OS than those without autoHCT (73% versus 60%, P  = .05). On multivariate analysis, early use of autoHCT was associated with significantly reduced mortality (hazard ratio, .63; 95% confidence interval, .42 to .94; P  = .02). Patients with FL experiencing ETF after frontline chemoimmunotherapy lack optimal therapy. We demonstrate improved OS when receiving autoHCT within 1 year of treatment failure. Results from this unique collaboration between the NLCS and CIBMTR support consideration of early consolidation with autoHCT in select FL patients experiencing ETF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retrospective studies have reported that the collected and infused autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) affects clinical outcomes after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT). We hypothesized that manipulation of the apheresis machine to target a higher A-ALC dose would translate into prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing APHSCT. Between December 2007 and October 2010, we performed a double-blind, phase III, randomized study randomly assigning 122 patients with NHL to undergo collection with the Fenwal Amicus Apheresis system with our standard settings (mononuclear cells offset of 1.5 and RBC offset of 5.0) or at modified settings (mononuclear cells offset of 1.5 and RBC of 6.0). The primary endpoint was PFS. Neither PFS (hazard ratio [HR] of modified to standard, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], .62 to 2.08; P = .70) nor overall survival (OS) (HR modified to standard, .85; 95% CI, .39 to 1.86; P = .68) were found to differ by collection method. Collection of A-ALC between both methods was similar. Both PFS ( P = .0025; HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.39 to 5.52) and OS ( P = .004; HR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.27 to 9.01) were inferior in patients infused with an A-ALC < .5 × 10 9 lymphocytes/kg compared with patients infused with an A-ALC ≥ .5 × 10 9 lymphocytes/kg, regardless of the method of collection. We did not detect significant differences in clinical outcomes or in the A-ALC collection between the modified and the standard Fenwal Amicus settings; however, despite physician discretion on primary number of collections and range of cells infused, higher A-ALC infused dose were associated with better survival after APHSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessment with 18 F-fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for lymphoma may be prognostic for outcomes. Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non–Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic HCT reported to the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry between 2007 and 2012 were included. Pre-HCT PET status (positive versus negative) was determined by the reporting transplantation centers. We analyzed 336 patients; median age was 55 years and 60% were males. Follicular lymphoma (n = 104) was more common than large cell (n = 85), mantle cell (n = 69), and mature natural killer or T cell lymphoma (n = 78); two thirds of the cohort received reduced-intensity conditioning; one half had unrelated donor grafts. Patients underwent PET scanning a median of 1 month (range, .07 to 2.83 months) before HCT; 159 were PET positive and 177 were PET negative. At 3 years, relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in PET-positive versus PET-negative groups were 40% versus 26%; P = .007; 43% versus 47%; P = .47; and 58% versus 60%; P = .73, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a positive pretransplantation PET was associated with an increased risk of relapse/progression (risk ratio [RR], 1.86; P = .001) but was not associated with increased mortality (RR, 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], .96 to 1.7; P = .08), therapy failure (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, .95 to 1.84; P = .10), or nonrelapse mortality (RR, .75; 95% CI, .48 to 1.18; P = .22). PET status conferred no influence on graft-versus-host disease. A positive PET scan before HCT is associated with increased relapse risk but should not be interpreted as a barrier to a successful allograft. PET status does not appear to predict survival after allogeneic HCT for NHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The poor prognosis for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse within 1 year of initial diagnosis after first-line rituximab-based chemo-immunotherapy has created controversy about the role of autologous transplantation (HCT) in this setting. We compared autologous HCT outcomes for chemosensitive DLBCL patients between 2000 and 2011 in 2 cohorts based on time to relapse from diagnosis. The early rituximab failure (ERF) cohort consisted of patients with primary refractory disease or those with first relapse within 1 year of initial diagnosis. The ERF cohort was compared with those relapsing >1 year after initial diagnosis (late rituximab failure [LRF] cohort). ERF and LRF cohorts included 300 and 216 patients, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM), progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of ERF versus LRF cohorts at 3 years were 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6% to 13%) versus 9% (95% CI, 5% to 13%), 47% (95% CI, 41% to 52%) versus 39% (95% CI, 33% to 46%), 44% (95% CI, 38% to 50%) versus 52% (95% CI, 45% to 59%), and 50% (95% CI, 44% to 56%) versus 67% (95% CI, 60% to 74%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, ERF was not associated with higher NRM (relative risk [RR], 1.31; P = .34). The ERF cohort had a higher risk of treatment failure (progression/relapse or death) (RR, 2.08; P < .001) and overall mortality (RR, 3.75; P < . 001) within the first 9 months after autologous HCT. Beyond this period, PFS and OS were not significantly different between the ERF and LRF cohorts. Autologous HCT provides durable disease control to a sizeable subset of DLBCL despite ERF (3-year PFS, 44%) and remains the standard-of-care in chemosensitive DLBCL regardless of the timing of disease relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Arrhythmias, especially supraventricular arrhythmias, often complicate the clinical course during autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). We wanted to determine the incidence and risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias during AHCT. The study included 983 patients (median age, 58 years [range, 19 to 77]; 61% male) who underwent AHCT between August 2006 and December 2010 at a single institution and for whom all relevant medical records were available for review. AHCT was done for plasma cell disorders in 58% patients and for lymphoma or leukemia in the remaining. Overall, 92 patients (9.4%) developed a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia at a median of 9 days posttransplantation (range, 0 to 18) and with a median duration of less than 1 day (range, <1 to 17 days). Atrial fibrillation was the most common and seen in 71 patients (7%), followed by atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia in 12 (1%) and 8 (1%) patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age older than 63 years, presence of premature supraventricular complexes or atrioventricular conduction delay on pretransplantation electrocardiogram, and history of any prior arrhythmia increased the risk of arrhythmia. Development of arrhythmia resulted in longer outpatient follow-up after AHCT, with the median follow-up for those developing an arrhythmia of 22 days compared with 19 days for the rest; P < .001. In conclusion, 9% of patients undergoing ASCT developed supraventricular arrhythmias posttransplantation, and this risk was elevated among older patients, those with a prior history of arrhythmias, and those with pretransplantation electrocardiographic abnormalities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Patients with chemorefractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas generally have a poor prognosis. We used the observational database of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to study the outcome of 533 patients with refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or grade III follicular lymphoma (FL-III) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using either myeloablative (MA; n = 307) or reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NST; n = 226) between 1998 and 2010. We analyzed nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Only 45% of the patients at transplantation had a Karnofsky performance score of ≥90%. Median follow-up of surviving patients after MA and RIC/NST allo-HCT is 35 months and 30 months, respectively. At 3 years, MA allo-HCT was associated with a higher NRM compared with RIC/NST (53% versus 42%; P = .03), similar PFS (19% versus 23%; P = .40), and lower OS (19% versus 28%; P = .02), respectively. On multivariate analysis, FL-III histology was associated with lower NRM (relative risk [RR], .52), reduced risk of relapse/progression (RR, .42), and superior PFS (RR, .51) and OS (RR, .53), whereas MA conditioning was associated with reduced risk of relapse/progression (RR, .66). Despite a refractory state, a small subset of DLBCL and FL-III patients can attain durable remissions after allo-HCT. Conditioning regimen intensity was not associated with PFS and OS despite a higher risk of relapse/progression with RIC/NST allo-HCT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Patients with chemorefractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have a poor prognosis. We used the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database to study the outcome of 202 patients with refractory MCL who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using either myeloablative (MA) or reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NST), during 1998-2010. We analyzed nonrelapse mortality (NRM), progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Seventy-four patients (median age, 54 years) received MA, and 128 patients (median age, 59 years) received RIC/NST. Median follow-up after allo-HCT was 35 months in the MA group and 43 months in the RIC/NST group. At 3 years post-transplantation, no significant between-group differences were seen in terms of NRM (47% in MA versus 43% in RIC/NST; P = .68), relapse/progression (33% versus 32%; P = .89), PFS (20% versus 25%; P = .53), or OS (25% versus 30%; P = .45). Multivariate analysis also revealed no significant between-group differences in NRM, relapse, PFS, or OS; however, receipt of a bone marrow or T cell–depleted allograft was associated with an increased risk of NRM and inferior PFS and OS. Our data suggest that despite a refractory disease state, approximately 25% of patients with MCL can attain durable remission after allo-HCT, and conditioning regimen intensity does not influence outcome of allo-HCT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Trends in utilization and outcomes after autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for Burkitt lymphoma were analyzed in 241 recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1985 and 2007. The autologous HCT cohort had a higher proportion of chemotherapy-sensitive disease, peripheral blood grafts, and HCT in first complete remission (CR1). The use of autologous HCT has declined over time, with only 19% done after 2001. Overall survival at 5 years for the autologous cohort was 83% for those in CR1 and 31% for those not in CR1. Corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) was 78% and 27%, respectively. After allogeneic HCT, overall survival at 5 years was 53% and 20% for the CR1 and non-CR1 cohorts, whereas PFS was 50% and 19%, respectively. The most common cause of death was progressive lymphoma. Allogeneic HCT performed in a higher-risk subset (per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) resulted in a 5-year PFS of 27%. Autologous HCT resulted in a 5-year PFS of 44% in those undergoing transplantation in the second CR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Historically, up to 30% of patients were unable to collect adequate numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has shown superior results in mobilizing peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells in comparison to G-CSF alone, but its high cost limits general use. We developed and evaluated risk-adapted algorithms for optimal utilization of plerixafor. In plerixafor-1, PBSC mobilization was commenced with G-CSF alone, and if PB CD34 on day 4 or day 5 was <10/μL, plerixafor was administered in the evening, and apheresis commenced the next day. In addition, if on any day, the daily yield was <0.5 × 106 CD34/kg, plerixafor was added. Subsequently, the algorithm was revised (plerixafor-2) with lower thresholds. If day-4 PB CD34 <10/μL for single or <20/μL for multiple transplantations, or day-1 yield was <1.5 × 106 CD34/kg, or any subsequent daily yield was <0.5 × 106 CD34/kg, plerixafor was added. Three time periods were analyzed for results and associated costs: January to December 2008 (baseline cohort; 319 mobilization attempts in 278 patients); February to November 2009 (plerixafor-1; 221 mobilization attempts in 216 patients); and December 2009 to June 2010 (plerixafor-2; 100 mobilization attempts in 98 patients). Plerixafor-2 shows a significant improvement in PB CD34 collection, increased number of patients reaching minimum and optimal goals, fewer days of apheresis, and fewer days of mobilization/collection, albeit at increased costs. In conclusion, although the earlier identification of ineffective PBSC mobilization and initiation of plerixafor (plerixafor-2) increases the per-patient costs of PBSC mobilization, failure rates, days of apheresis, and total days of mobilization/collection are lower. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We studied the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after lower-intensity conditioning regimens (reduced-intensity conditioning and nonmyeloablative) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma who relapsed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nonrelapse mortality, lymphoma progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were analyzed in 263 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. All 263 patients had relapsed after a previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and then had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a related (n = 26) or unrelated (n = 237) donor after reduced-intensity conditioning (n = 128) or nonmyeloablative (n = 135) and were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1996 and 2006. The median follow-up of survivors was 68 months (range, 3-111 months). Three-year nonrelapse mortality was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-50%). Lymphoma progression/relapse at 3 years was 35% (95% CI, 29%-41%). Three-year probabilities of PFS and overall survival were 21% (95% CI, 16%-27%) and 32% (95% CI, 27%-38%), respectively. Superior Karnofsky Performance Score, longer interval between transplantations, total body irradiation-based conditioning regimen, and lymphoma remission at transplantation were correlated with improved PFS. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after lower-intensity conditioning is associated with significant nonrelapse mortality but can result in long-term PFS. We describe a quantitative risk model based on pretransplantation risk factors to identify those patients likely to benefit from this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared outcomes of 916 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients aged ≥18 years undergoing first autologous (n = 837) or myeloablative (MA) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (n = 79) between 1995 and 2003 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Median follow-up was 81 months for allogeneic HCT versus 60 months for autologous HCT. Allogeneic HCT recipients were more likely to have high-risk disease features including higher stage, more prior chemotherapy regimens, and resistant disease. Allogeneic HCT was associated with a higher 1 year treatment-related mortality (TRM) (relative risk [RR] 4.88, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.21-7.40, P < .001), treatment failure (RR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.54-2.75, P < .001), and mortality (RR 2.75, 95% CI, 2.03-3.72, P < .001). Risk of disease progression was similar in the 2 groups (RR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.73-1.72, P = .59). In fact, for 1-year survivors, no significant differences were observed for TRM, progression, progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Increased risks of TRM and mortality were associated with older age (>50 years), lower performance score, chemoresistance, and earlier year of transplant. In a cohort of mainly high-risk DLBCL patients, upfront MA allogeneic HCT, although associated with increased early mortality, was associated with a similar risk of disease progression compared to lower risk patients receiving autologous HCT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: To compare the clinical outcomes of older (age ≥55 years) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with younger NHL patients (<55 years) receiving autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) while adjusting for patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables, we compared autologous HCT outcomes in 805 NHL patients aged ≥55 years to 1949 NHL patients <55 years during the years 1990–2000 using data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). In multivariate analysis, older patients with aggressive histologies were 1.86 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.43, P < .001) more likely than younger patients to experience treatment-related mortality (TRM). Relative death risks were 1.33 times (CI 1.04-1.71, P = .024) and 1.50 times (CI 1.33-16.9, P < .001) higher in older compared to younger patients with follicular grade I/II and aggressive histologies, respectively. Autologous HCT in older NHL patients is feasible, but most disease-related outcomes are statistically inferior to younger patients. Studies addressing supportive care particular to older patients, who are most likely to benefit from this approach, are recommended. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have been increasingly used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in follicular lymphoma (FL). We compared traditional myeloablative conditioning regimens to RIC in FL. Outcomes of HLA-identical sibling HSCT for FL in 208 recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) between 1997 and 2002 were studied. Conditioning regimens were categorized as myeloablative (N = 120) or RIC (N = 88). Use of RIC regimens increased from <10% of transplants in 1997 to >80% in 2002 signaling a major shift in practice. Patients receiving RIC were older and had a longer interval from diagnosis to transplant. These differences did not correlate with outcomes. Median follow-up of survivors was 50 months (4-96 months) after myeloablative conditioning versus 35 months (4-82 months) after RIC (P < .001). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) for the myeloablative and RIC cohorts were 71 (63%-79%) and 62 (51%-72%; P = .15) and progression free survival (PFS), 67 (58%-75%) and 55 (44%-65%; P = .07), respectively. Lower Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and resistance to chemotherapy were associated with higher treatment-related mortality (TRM) and lower OS and PFS. On multivariate analysis, an increased risk of lymphoma progression after RIC was observed (relative risk = 2.97, P = .04). RIC has become the de facto standard in allogeneic HSCT for FL, and appears to result in similar long-term outcomes. Although disease-free survival (DPS) is similar compared to myeloablative conditioning, an increased risk of late disease progression after RIC is concerning. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell lymphoma with protean clinical presentation accounting for < 1% of adult non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the United States. High dose, intensive chemotherapy regimens like CODOX-M/IVAC, HyperCVAD, and DA-REPOCH achieve a 5-yr OS rate of 60-80%. However, HCT remains the only curative option in relapsed patients. Herein, we describe our single center experience of BL patients who underwent HCT. After regulatory approval, clinical and outcome data for BL patients who underwent HCT from 2000-2019 were collected. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who achieved complete response (CR1), ≥ CR2 and partial response (PR) prior to HCT. Patients who achieved CR after induction chemotherapy were considered CR1; patients requiring more than 1 line of chemotherapy to achieve CR were considered ≥CR2. Twenty three patients were identified; the median age was 51 (range: 17-71) years. 10 (43%) patients were identified as low-risk, 11(47%) were high-risk at diagnosis, and risk status was unknown in 2 patients. At the time of diagnosis 5(22%) patients had stage I-II disease, 17 (74%) patients had stage III-IV disease. Four (17%) patients had BM involvement at presentation and 1 had CNS disease. CODOX-M/IVAC-rituximab (2-4 cycles) was the most common first-line chemotherapy regimen (n = 10; 43%). Eight (34.7%) patients achieved CR1, 6 (26%) patients attained CR2 and 9 (39%) patients had a PR or refractory disease after more than 2 lines of chemotherapy. Median time to relapse from diagnosis was 8 months (IQR was 4-78). Median time from diagnosis to HCT was 7 months (IQR 5-9). 22 patients underwent autologous HCT with BEAM conditioning; 8 in CR1, 5 in CR2 and 9 in PR. One patient underwent matched sibling donor allogeneic HCT in CR2. The median follow up for the entire cohort was 35 months (IQR 4-92). Median PFS calculated from D0 of HCT to disease progression, last follow up or death was not reached (NR) for patients in CR1 and CR2, and 6 months in the PR cohort (p = 0.05). Median OS was not reached in patients who were in CR1 and CR2 as compared to 19 months in partial responders (p=0.055). In our limited series, autologous HCT in CR1 is associated with an excellent outcome. About 50% of chemo sensitive patients in CR2 can also achieve long term remission after HCT. This finding needs to be validated in a larger cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a variant of NHL, involving the brain, leptomeninges, spinal cord, and/or the eyes without any evidence of systemic disease. Optimal therapy in PCNSL is yet to be determined. High dose methotrexate (HD-MTx) forms the mainstay of treatment. Consolidation strategies include radiation, non-myeloablative chemotherapy or myeloablative chemotherapy followed by stem cell rescue (ASCT). Thiotepa-based conditioning is preferred for ASCT based on evidence of superiority over BEAM conditioning. These studies however, are small in size and mostly single center. Typical drug costs for thiotepa exceed $100,000 and may be 3-4 times that of BEAM. We describe our experience at the Mayo Clinic of PCNSL patients who underwent BEAM conditioning. We identified patients with a diagnosis of PCNSL that received BEAM conditioning for ASCT. Baseline characteristics were collected. All the patients were diagnosed before the year 2010 (thiotepa based conditioning preferred clinical practice after). MRI brain before transplant and day +100 were reviewed, and disease status was categorized based on international PCNSL collaborative group consensus (IPCG) guidelines. Overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method and compared using the Log-Rank test. 25 patients with PCNSL underwent BEAM conditioning for ASCT. The median age at diagnosis was 50 (26-67) years. There was slight male preponderance (n =15; 60%); 22 (88%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with 1 case each of PTCL-NOS, HGBL-NOS, and ALK-negative ALCL. All patients received HD-MTx, and since ASCT consolidation was not standard practice at the time, some patients also received rituximab (n =9), temozolomide (n =5) and radiation therapy (n = 3). Median time to transplant from diagnosis was 6 (2-73) months. 76% patients had achieved CR (n =18) or CRU (n =1) before transplant and 24% (n = 6) had partial response. Day +100 MRI evaluation demonstrated findings consistent with progressive disease in 20% (n = 5). These were patients not in CR prior to ASCT. Median OS for the entire cohort was 144 months (Figure 1). There was a statistically significant difference in OS based on remission status prior to transplant; median OS was 164 vs 31 months (p< 0.001) for patients in CR vs PR, respectively. After a median follow-up of 186 months, 14 patients were in CR, 10 had relapsed disease and 1 had stable disease at the time of death or last follow up. BEAM conditioning resulted in a prolonged median OS, especially in the patients achieving CR prior to transplant. Although thiotepa-based regimens are currently preferred over BEAM conditioning for ASCT, there are significant financial implications. There remains a need for more robust clinical trial data comparing the efficacy and safety between these alternative regimens and their pharmacoeconomic impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We analyzed the outcomes of 248 (61% male) adult recipients of HLA-matched unrelated and HLA-mismatched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after reduced or lower intensity conditioning (RIC), reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) from 1997 to 2004. Median age was 52 (range: 18-72 years); 31% had a Karnofsky performance score <90. Follicular NHL (43%) was the major histology. Incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was 43% at 100 days; and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 44% at 3 years. Treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 100 days was 24%. Three-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 41% and 32%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and HLA mismatch were associated with increased TRM. High-grade histology, ATG use, and chemotherapy resistance were associated with lower PFS. Older age, shorter interval from diagnosis to HCT, non–total body irridiation (TBI) conditioning regimens, ex vivo T cell depletion, and HLA-mismatched unrelated donors were associated with mortality. GVHD did not influence relapse or PFS. Older age, aggressive histology, and chemotherapy resistance correlated with poorer survival. For selected patients with NHL, lack of an available sibling donor should not be a barrier to allogeneic HCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]