1. Evaluation of Efficacy of Adding Aprepitant to Palonosetron and Dexamethasone in Carboplatin and Etoposide Therapy.
- Author
-
Sakamoto T, Kado M, Saito Y, Uchiyama K, Kanno R, Taniguchi O, Takekuma Y, Sakakibara-Konishi J, Shimizu Y, Kinoshita I, and Sugawara M
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Drug Therapy, Combination, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Quinuclidines administration & dosage, Quinuclidines therapeutic use, Morpholines administration & dosage, Morpholines therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Isoquinolines administration & dosage, Isoquinolines therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, Aprepitant therapeutic use, Aprepitant administration & dosage, Carboplatin administration & dosage, Carboplatin therapeutic use, Carboplatin adverse effects, Dexamethasone administration & dosage, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Palonosetron administration & dosage, Palonosetron therapeutic use, Etoposide administration & dosage, Etoposide therapeutic use, Antiemetics administration & dosage, Antiemetics therapeutic use, Vomiting chemically induced, Vomiting prevention & control, Nausea chemically induced, Nausea prevention & control
- Abstract
Although carboplatin (CBDCA) is classified as a moderately emetogenic agent, the majority of guidelines recommend the use of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist in addition to a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist with dexamethasone (DEX) for CBDCA-containing chemotherapy because of its higher emetogenic risk. However, the additional efficacy of aprepitant (APR) in CBDCA-containing treatment remains controversial, and data on multiple-day treatments are limited. Etoposide (ETP) was administered on days 1-3 in the CBDCA + ETP regimen, and it is important to evaluate suitable antiemetic therapy for the regimen. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of additional APR in CBDCA + ETP. Patients were divided into two groups and retrospectively evaluated. One was the control group, which was prophylactically administered palonosetron (PALO) and DEX, and the other was the APR group, which received APR orally with PALO and DEX. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) between the groups. The overall CR rates were 75.0 and 76.4% in the control and APR groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 1.00). In the acute phase, it was 88.9 and 97.2%, respectively, and 86.1 and 79.2% in the delayed phase, respectively, without significant differences (p = 0.10 and 0.38, respectively). The incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were not significantly different between the two groups in the acute and delayed phases. Our findings suggest that combining APR with PALO and DEX does not improve the CR rate in CBDCA + ETP therapy.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF