1. Mitigation and conservation plant translocations: Do perspectives of practice, funding and success vary between sectors?
- Author
-
Doyle, Chantelle A.T., Garrard, Georgia E., Martin, Jen K., and Ooi, Mark K.J.
- Subjects
- *
PLANT translocation , *PLANT conservation , *CONSERVATION projects (Natural resources) , *BUDGET , *SUCCESS - Abstract
Conservation and mitigation translocations aim for similar positive outcomes for species under threat, however different motivations drive their implementation. Despite the clear human component behind motivation, there has been limited examination of practitioner perceptions and how they compare across the conservation and mitigation sectors, or how practitioners view budget, timelines, and outcomes. Using semi-structured interviews, we observed significantly greater investment of in-kind contributions, as well as longer planning and project duration phases in the conservation sector. The reliance of the conservation sector on in-kind contributions is fraught, because although it correlates with longer-term project investment, there are risks from fatigue of personnel. Despite general support for translocation, most practitioners perceived the goals of conservation and mitigation projects as different, and mitigation practitioners were less likely to feel that the resource expenditure was justified. Both practitioner types aligned perceptions of success, estimated via plant survival and recruitment, with IUCN Translocation Perspectives ranking criteria. Our results demonstrated that a large knowledge gap exists in understanding the motivational drivers of practitioners, which needs to be filled for improved translocation outcomes. Interviewees from both sectors identified people-related project elements, such as expectations and communication, as key areas requiring improvement for better project outcomes. Site, timelines, and maintenance were also nominated areas for improvement, but this perception was influenced by experience level. Given the rapid growth in this field, we suggest the most advantageous improvements could be made in mentoring, communication, and planning, ensuring staged success criteria aligned with both species and team goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF