1. Interspecific variation in patterns of adhesion of marine fouling to silicone surfaces
- Author
-
Christopher J Kavanagh, Geoff Swain, Kathryn Truby, Deborah Wiebe, Anne E. Meyer, Brian T. Nedved, Dean E. Wendt, Judith Stein, Michael G. Hadfield, Eric R. Holm, Jean Montemarano, Celia M. Smith, and Christina Darkangelo Wood
- Subjects
Geologic Sediments ,Oceans and Seas ,Silicones ,Zoology ,Marine Biology ,Aquatic Science ,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology ,Balanus ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Barnacle ,Silicone ,Species Specificity ,Animals ,Crepidula ,Water Science and Technology ,Principal Component Analysis ,biology ,Fouling ,Ecology ,Thoracica ,Ostrea ,Adhesiveness ,Adhesion ,biology.organism_classification ,chemistry ,Mollusca ,Crassostrea - Abstract
The adhesion of six fouling organisms: the barnacle Balanus eburneus, the gastropod mollusc Crepidulafornicata, the bivalve molluscs Crassostrea virginica and Ostrea/Dendrostrea spp., and the serpulid tubeworms Hydroides dianthus and H. elegans, to 12 silicone fouling-release surfaces was examined. Removal stress (adhesion strength) varied among the fouling species and among the surfaces. Principal component analysis of the removal stress data revealed that the fouling species fell into two distinct groups, one comprising the bivalve molluscs and tubeworms, and the other the barnacle and the gastropod mollusc. None of the silicone materials generated a minimum in removal stress for all the organisms tested, although several surfaces produced low adhesion strengths for both groups of species. These results suggest that fouling-release materials do not rank (in terms of adhesion strength) identically for all fouling organisms, and thus development of a globally-effective hull coating will continue to require testing against a diversity of encrusting species.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF