Search

Several findings challenge the notion that specification of cell types and embryonic axes in mammals are rooted entirely in the temporal and spatial relations between cleaving blastomeres. They raise the question as to whether, as in most non-mammalian species, these processes depend on information already present in the egg. However, experiments designed to investigate this possibility directly by perturbing the organization of the zygote or, very recently, by deleting one or other of its polar regions [M. Zernicka-Goetz. Fertile offspring derived from mammalian eggs lacking either animal or vegetal poles. Development 1998;125:4803–4808 (Ref. 1)], have been interpreted to mean that such a role for the egg can be discounted. This conclusion seems premature in view of continuing uncertainty regarding the developmental potential of individual blastomeres in mammals. BioEssays 21:271–274, 1999. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This is a personal account of why the author chose to focus on devising techniques for micromanipulating the blastocyst stage conceptus as a way of investigating early development in mammals. Its aim is to provide insight into what such technical innovations entailed and how they have contributed to present understanding of both embryology and the analysis of gene function in mammals. The ability to dissect and reconstitute mouse blastocysts, and to inject cells or tissue into them, enabled genes to be harnessed as markers for elucidating the lineage of cells and interactions between tissues from the stage when differentiation is first evident. Most importantly, it made it possible to apply clonal analysis to the study of cell fate in mammals. The scope of blastocyst micromanipulation was further enhanced when embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells and, particularly, embryonic stem (ES) cells were found to be able to participate in normal development and contribute to the germ line following injection into the blastocyst. BioEssays 20:168–180, 1998. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.