Search

Biomass cost, supply, and quality are critical parameters to consider when choosing feedstocks and locations for biorefineries. Biomass cost is dependent upon feedstock type, location, quantities available, logistics costs, and the quality specifications required by the biorefinery. Biomass quality depends upon feedstock type, growth conditions, weather, harvesting methods, storage conditions, and any preprocessing methods used to improve quality. Biomass quantity depends on location as well as growth conditions, weather, harvesting methods, and storage conditions. This study examines the interdependencies of these parameters and how they affect the biomass blends required by biomass depots and/or biorefineries to achieve the lowest cost feedstock with sufficient quality at the quantities needed for biorefinery operation. Four biomass depots were proposed in South Carolina to each produce 200,000 t of feedstock per year. These depots supply a centrally located 800,000 t biorefinery that converts the feedstocks to bio-oil using either catalyzed or uncatalyzed fast pyrolysis. The four depots utilize biomass based upon availability, but the feedstock or feedstock blend still met the minimum quality requirements for the biorefinery. Costs were minimized by using waste biomass resources such as construction and demolition waste, logging residues, and forest residuals. As necessary, preprocessing methods such as air classification and acid leaching were used to upgrade biomass quality. For both uncatalyzed and catalyzed fast pyrolysis, all four depots could produce biomass blends that met quality and quantity specifications at a cost lower than using a single feedstock.

Lignocellulosic biorefineries have tonnage and throughput requirements that must be met year round, and there is no single feedstock available in any given region that is capable of meeting the price and availability demands of the biorefineries. Ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment with certain ILs is receiving significant attentions as a potential process that enables fractionation of a wide range of feedstocks and produces high yields of fermentable sugars suitable for biofuel production. Building on the large-scale demonstration of a single herbaceous feedstock (switchgrass), this work extends scale-up of IL pretreatment to woody (eucalyptus) and mixed feedstock (mixtures of two) by 30-fold, relative to the bench scale (6 vs 0.2 L) at 10 % solid loading. The mixed feedstock recovered similar yields of glucan (99.7 %), xylan (62.8 %), and lignin (59.9 %) as switchgrass and eucalyptus at 6-L scale operation, and results of all three feedstocks are better than those obtained from small-scale studies. By integrating the process of IL pretreatment with efficient and scalable homogenization, washing, and product recovery system, IL contents in the recovered materials were decreased to 0.2 %, mitigating the risk to downstream enzymatic saccharification and microbial fermentation. Results indicate that mixed feedstock are viable and valuable resource to consider when assessing biomass availability and affordability for lignocellulosic biorefineries. This scale-up evaluation demonstrates that IL pretreatment technology is feedstock agnostic and can be effectively scaled to larger operations.