Search

Fatty acid binding protein 5 (FABP5) is a promising target for development of inhibitors to help control pain and inflammation. In this work, computer-based docking (DOCK6 program) was employed to screen ∼2 M commercially available compounds to FABP5 based on an X-ray structure complexed with the small molecule inhibitor SBFI-26 previously identified by our group (also through virtual screening). The goal was discovery of additional chemotypes. The screen resulted in the purchase of 78 candidates, which led to the identification of a new inhibitor scaffold (STK-0) with micromolar affinity and apparent selectivity for FABP5 over FABP3. A second similarity-based screen resulted in three additional hits (STK-15, STK-21, STK-22) from which preliminary SAR could be derived. Notably, STK-15 showed comparable activity to the SBFI-26 reference under the same assay conditions (1.40 vs 0.86 μM). Additional molecular dynamics simulations, free energy calculations, and structural analysis (starting from DOCK-generated poses) revealed that R enantiomers (dihydropyrrole scaffold) of STK-15 and STK-22 have a more optimal composition of functional groups to facilitate additional H-bonds with Arg109 of FABP5. This observation suggests enantiomerically pure compounds could show enhanced activity. Overall, our study highlights the utility of using similarity-based screening methods to discover new inhibitor chemotypes, and the identified FABP5 hits provide a strong starting point for future efforts geared to improve activity.

Human FABP5 and FABP7 are intracellular endocannabinoid transporters. SBFI-26 is an α-truxillic acid 1-naphthyl monoester that inhibits the activities of FABP5 and FABP7 and produces antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in mice. The synthesis of SBFI-26 yields several stereoisomers, and it is not known how the inhibitor binds the transporters. Here we report co-crystal structures of SBFI-26 in complex with human FABP5 and FABP7 at a resolution of 2.2 Å and 1.9 Å, respectively. We found that only (S)-SBFI-26 was present in the crystal structures. The inhibitor largely mimics the fatty acid binding pattern, but it also has several unique interactions. Notably, the FABP7 complex corroborates key aspects of the ligand binding pose at the canonical site previously predicted by virtual screening. In FABP5, SBFI-26 was unexpectedly found to bind at the substrate entry portal region in addition to binding at the canonical ligand-binding pocket. Our structural and binding energy analyses indicate that both (R) and (S) forms appear to bind the transporter equally well. We suggest that the (S) enantiomer observed in the crystal structures may be a result of the crystallization process selectively incorporating the (S)-SBFI-26-FABP complexes into the growing lattice, or that the (S)-enantiomer may bind to the portal site more rapidly than to the canonical site, leading to an increased local concentration of the (S) enantiomer for binding to the canonical site. Our work reveals two binding poses of SBFI-26 in its target transporters. This knowledge will guide the development of more potent FABP inhibitors based upon the SBFI-26 scaffold.

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) 20S proteasome is vital for the pathogen to survive under nitrosative stress in vitro and to persist in mice. To qualify for drug development, inhibitors targeting Mtb 20S must spare both the human constitutive proteasome (c-20S) and immunoproteasome (i-20S). We recently reported members of a family of noncovalently binding dipeptide proteasome inhibitors that are highly potent and selective for Mtb 20S over human c-20S and i-20S. To understand the structural basis of their potency and selectivity, we have studied the structure–activity relationship of six derivatives and solved their co-crystal structures with Mtb 20S. The dipeptide inhibitors form an antiparallel β-strand with the active site β-strands. Selectivity is conferred by several features of Mtb 20S relative to its mouse counterparts, including a larger S1 pocket, additional hydrogen bonds in the S3 pocket, and hydrophobic interactions in the S4 pocket. Serine-20 and glutamine-22 of Mtb 20S interact with the dipeptides and confer Mtb-specific inhibition over c-20S and i-20S. The Mtb 20S and mammalian i-20S have a serine-27 that interacts strongly with the dipeptides, potentially explaining the higher inhibitory activity of the dipeptides toward i-20S over c-20S. This detailed structural knowledge will aid in optimizing the dipeptides as anti-tuberculosis drugs.